In the public interest.

https://www.tiktok.com/@the.hummingbird.hermit/photo/7496026242874019094

I wasn’t going to listen to this but I am glad I did. I know through my own research there are high level attempts and actions to weaponise men against women.

Not all men will fall for the ‘set up’ and may well defend women as is the natural order. This natural state of being is being undermined by the creation of female ‘super heroes’ and women participating in boxing so that men can view them being beaten. I am aware that personal data can be purchased by third parties when women (or men) have unwittingly signed off on Working with Children Checks. This means police data, health records, employment status data etc. can be accessed by nefarious actors who seek to use this data to attack a female who has been targeted which is the same focus as stalking. I know someone who had this happen. It was very evident she was being not only stalked via surveillance, but her private data was being accessed in the attempt to asset strip based on false allegations of a ‘debt’ and create a civil case in court based on a fictitious debt. It was evident this was targeting due to common law and awareness of crimes at higher levels. This is the silent war that is waged against women. It is an issue I am deeply reflecting on.

I will now return to the psychologist response to a woman in Brisbane who has been found to have been genuinely stalked and this report being interpreted as ‘mental health’ and police decided to remove her ‘consent’ by sectioning her under the Mental Health Act and sending her to a psychiatric facility.

My mind travelled immediately to ancient times where I saw in my mind’s eye women being emotional (hysterical) or delicate and this being viewed as a ‘weakness’ or disturbance which led to beliefs of mental illness.

In the current time the transhumanism agenda seeks to remove females, even the rights to her gender, males moving into traditional female areas (toilets, sports, Miss Universe) under the LBQTI classification of a man’s right to be a woman. I note few women have sought to dress as men and enter men’s toilets, sport or men’s groups. The focus primarily has been on the right of men to be women and images of them teaching young children that dressing as a woman is a woman when it is not.

No offence to those who like to wear women’s clothing, I personally have no issue. However, the words of James Whitcomb Riley (1849–1916) come to me when he coined the phrase: “When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck…”

I have been contemplating the positioning of women in roles where they preside over controversial areas in the Great Reset. Some were Premiers, Chief Health Officers, medical experts, CEOs of corporations, Police Commissioners, heads of Departments or Regulators, Chief Data Officers, journalists as mouth pieces wittingly or unwittingly reinforcing this shift in social norms. What many do not know is they are being set up to fall. In my view it has nothing to do with equality, although I am sure they have equal or greater ability, but the intent behind promotion is using the ‘woman” as the public trust women, particularly mothers.

The fall of Eve comes to mind and I recall Coles actually putting a sticker on a apple. This connected to Eve eating the apple in the Garden of Eden and accused of the fall of Adam.

I, myself have been set up after a sexual harassment matter by those in high positions who wanted me to go away. I didn’t understand the inequality or misogyny that was behind it, as it wasn’t part of my experience or awareness. Yet overtime, I came to see the silent game played out with me that used silence to remove problems rather than the males involved look into their own void. I noted they projected a ‘problem’ onto me but refused to resolve the matter. I invited them to mediate the issue to ensure both sides understood the other’s perspective. I persevered in the conflict as I had principled felt awareness of my own equality and potential psychological harm for younger women who may unwittingly be manipulated by powerful men.

The sexual harassment matter occurred outside of the institution and I reported this to a Ombudsman, rather than senior management deal with ‘stalking’ by a staff member who was staring at me through a window of a cafe. I had the police on my door handing me a Public Safety Intervention Order. I am a peacemaker, made no threats to anyone but persistently held the matter up to be resolved. This was done gently as it impacted my life. Now the courts allowed this order as it had been long term with 2 men. At the first hearing the Judge decided to make the plea for me ‘consent without admission’. I had no idea of this process, no legal representation (low income, less rights). In the hearing which was closed to public scrutiny, the judge was selected by the other side, case made without my consent, and this judge decided to make a deal. I had wanted to end my life, yet I was positioned as a ‘stalker and harasser’ when I wasn’t. I sought resolution via mediation. This was not offered by the court. I was coerced and positioned as the ‘problem’ for 2 days (my Appeal time) in a biased legal situation without any legal help. I was set up to fall, was the reality. I was under duress and signed a document to say I wouldn’t stalk and harass even though in the court I said it was the other way around. I was in fact the one played with by men who had no understanding of their feelings, empathy or respect.

So the female persecution comes from denial in my experience. I don’t personally blame anyone as I can see this has been a lineage of false teachings from fathers to sons in a patriarchial controlled world where women have been seen as ‘less’ and to service men’s needs rather than work together in equality. I have a very strong principle of equality, no matter the gender, I believe everyone should be given a fair go and that all sides are heard and that a fair solution arises out of it.

However, in a increasingly toxic world of ‘power over’ or more aptly the Andrew Jackson quote “to the victor go the spoils”, they do not play fair, the game is about winning not justice. I saw this psychological abuse as tactical to undermine what they unquestioningly perceived as a ‘threat’ to their power, not a violation or crime, I was a challenge to their power as I said what I thought and saw myself as equal. I just couldn’t see myself as less was my reality. I was born this way.

I will sit with this for a moment, as I go into the stillness (not hysteria) to find my answers.

What I saw through years of poetry and self reflection was men were in fact unable to express the feminine within them. They were raised by role models, increasingly not fathers and grandfathers. The man is taught he must dominate or rule the female, head of the household and the builder of the civilisation. I saw my younger brother change when he absorbed the masculine culture and belief he was superior because he could fix things, yet he felt ‘threat’ when his sisters were verbally able to out wit him. The older one stood over me and threatened me but I felt no fear. He didn’t like that as he sought power over me. I saw a man who lost his connection to his humanity and suppressed his feelings opting for the ‘money’ to prove his worth rather than solve the deep problems he felt without anti-depressants.

I believe men are trapped in a toxic role model where they can’t be human, they can’t cry and they can’t feel softness for another without being put down by other males who believe you have to ‘man up’, ‘show em whose boss’, ‘be the man’ as if fear, anxiety, hysteria in him is some sort of weakness, it is not. It is being human. With the LBQTI men wanting to dress as women could well have its root in the feminine within being trapped and he can only express it in the pretence of being a woman rather than a man who loves earrings, pretty dresses and make up. Again, I have no issue with that, I believe in freedom, be who you want to be, just don’t impose it on me in relation to me having to lie to make you feel good. I can’t do that. I have no issue with a woman dressing as a man but don’t tell me to call you a man when I know you are a woman dressing as a man. What I do observe is privileges given to those in this category e.g. free passports, categorised as disadvantaged, whereby myself as a homeless person gets a lot less. No amplification to higher status or societal respect.

So lots of complexity to the woman being sectioned as having mental health when the men around the problem are seeking power over. Unaware of unconscious bias, prejudices and a general pervading sense of female weakness or lack of evidence, therefore it must be mental health. Easy to use this label to shut her up. The reality is that whatever turns up in his or her reality must be looked at with clear seeing.

In my case I did see a mental health imbalance/distortion in the men who felt entitled to stare as a game of ‘power’ not ‘admiration’. I can sense their inability to confront their own feelings, attraction or sense of ‘need’ to feel power or approval from a woman without a corresponding empathy, that is to stand in her shoes. The psychological ‘hook’ that happens is energetic when we feel connection and unaware of the ‘invisible’ human chords that attach revealing another layer of complexity in the social fabric. The mixed messages sent reveal a complex psychology that only the patient can unravel providing there is no desire to get into conflict. I noted the inability to communicate honestly or reveal vulnerabilities or weaknesses he felt as he didn’t know himself or his feelings. Underneath that are layers of fear of exposure, fear of failure, fear of not enough unaware of the social dynamics that may have roots in an unconscious search for the ‘self’.

So as I work my way through this I find myself in both pairs of shoes. I can easily sit with the female and how she is being put down, made to feel unstable, set up to fall, her powerful emotional intelligence, her softness, nurturing, and centre of community where she chats with girlfriends and has fun. This contrasts with the male who seeks to prove himself, feel the power, be respected, assume order as his purpose is to have something to show for his work and be admired. It circles around the ego more strongly with the male. The female tends to be accustomed to selfless service, unseen, not respected for her contribution and misunderstood. Both fall into confusion and many good friendships or relationships or associations can end as a result of not understanding the diverse psychology fuelled by oestrogen and testosterone of two sexes trying to unite in harmony. These are existential in search of who we are and what life is.

The war against women is the war against man. You will note wo-man, fe-male, both are two halves of the whole. You attack the opposite sex and find that this comes back as we are same same but different. The female has natural power and men seek this human made power, as many do not know how to be in this world. I understand that. Women are now trying to be men. None of it works and in the end we return to our essential nature and we learn that what we see in another is in the self. So the mental health problem seen by man in the woman is really his own mental issues projected. His refusing to believe her is because he thinks facts are truth rather than the ‘felt’ experience of stalking. Rather than turn to alleviate the fear and calm her he victim blames her as he can’t see the evidence. This is the material world versus the socio-emotional world. It is like structure versus organic. We feel to see, men think to see as dichotomies which can overlap. The feminine sees the unseen far more than the masculine who tries to predict, to control, to structure, to build rather than feel, to see, to blend, to harmonise to connect as the fundamental human/social structure that is energetic and not in straight lines. We live in different realities yet each thinks they know the other. The female has to adapt to live in a male structured world, so she has to step across that line, the men typically reject the feminine as ‘soft’ or ‘weak’ or ‘vulnerable’ so he still remains distant from her, unless he learns to step across into her world. When he does he will find he is not emasculated but liberated as his inner feminine reunites with the masculine. This creates balance within and then outside.

Our world if full of conflict, labels, diseases, environmental imbalance because the masculine and feminine or the feminine and masculine have not found the truth of their relationship within and outside. This dichotomy is a fundamental duality of nature, found in most species unless at the atomic, sub-atomic and nano levels. We can use words, we can embed structural violence, we can weaponise men as violent perpetrators or women as nagging provocateurs or try and profile the feminine as men – murders, psychopaths, fighters (Matrix), but these are all false projections from those who never found the beauty of their inner feminine which was never weak but the doorway to their liberation from rigidity and fear. Fear actually means false evidence appearing real. When you face all fear and rise, you reconcile the aspects of self that are suppressed and need to be acknowledged. These inner suppressions play out in the world as ‘the other’, always the source is within.

I feel this strongly as I write. Peace and clear seeing in our world will occur when each ‘know thyself and be true’. The same applies to women as they step into the shoes of men.

What I do know is that these false stereotypes do not lead to true happiness in community or a true understanding of the joy of common unity and what real intimacy means (in-to-me-see). We are still at a stage of the little child working out our fingers and our toes unable to really feel the ‘other’. When we do all wars will end. There will be no market for mental health opioids or weapons, as you will know there is nothing to fear but fear itself.

There are civilisations in this universe far more advanced than us who, like us, had to work through conflict, wars, imbalance and untruth. Yet I feel we are learning to walk, my hope is we hold hands and walk together rather than seeking to win the war. You destroy Eve, you destroy your very self. S/he is One. Until you learn to lose gracefully you can never win the lesson (wisdom). That is a fundamental teaching that you will discover when you let go of the need to be right, to be better, to be more powerful or dominate. As you relinquish these insecurities that build walls you will see yourself in the bigger picture, important yet insignificant, part of the infinite flow of nature, as energy transforms. Magical yet simple. Inquisitive yet calm and imbued with potential that is unlimited. When you let go of what no longer works and embrace the truth of who you are.

That is my wish for all.

I choose a future of reconciliation, resolved conflict and taking full responsibility for how our lives impact each other. If one has hurt another just go to the other and apologise, imagine they are you, how would you feel?

What is the saying:

Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.