Are Human rights or Greed more Important at the G20?

This article was sent in respect of Saudi Arabia hosting the G20.  Transparency International are not attending this year given human rights violations.

I always recall Clinton announcing the decoupling of human rights from trade.  I believe this was a visible moment where they declared that making money was more important than treating people with dignity and respect.   This provided a green light that the US won’t do anything if human rights are violated.  However, if their rights are violated there will be a great marketing campaign around that.  I do smile and shudder at the same time.  Yet what you do to another returns to the self.  It is only those disconnected who cannot see how intimately they are connected to others and the natural law of cause and effect.  As they harm others life mirrors back, one way or another.

Greed and the need for power are mental health issues that in truth reflect not enough and powerlessness parading as power.  I thought about wealthy boys in families where their parents are not there.  Where they are raised by hired help ie. nanny’s. Similar to the Taliban they never know the true love of intimate family where their needs are met.  I sense this is at the heart of the problem. The absence of father’s love, so boys go out into the world trying to make their parents proud, to impress others.  Perhaps this is the birth of ambition.

Money is not freedom and suppression is not control, it is merely fear using tools to feel certainty and maintain abundance which is perceived as success and ‘good enough’.  Yet always they were good enough, they just learned to believe what the world mirrored back rather than looking into the mirror and accepting themselves as they are.

So Transparency International’s article is about not endorsing corruption and human rights abuses.  That is a wise move, a vote for healthy communities based on equality.  When equality is lived corruption disappears.

Transparency International logo
Hi Susan,

Just like dirty money, bad reputations can be laundered – and there are plenty of companies willing to help with that.

Saudi Arabia, for example, has spent millions of dollars to polish its reputation and suppress criticism from international media. With the help of Western PR agencies, the government is pushing the image of a modern country attractive for foreign investors.

At home, however, the Kingdom regularly arrests and prosecutes human rights defenders, censors free speech, limits free movement, and tortures and mistreats detained journalists and activists. The Crown Prince’s recent ‘anti-corruption’ purge seems to be little more than a means of consolidating political power. Despite government claims of recovering approximately US$106 billion of stolen assets, there was no due process, transparent investigation or fair and free trial for suspects.

So, as Saudi Arabia is taking over as host country for the G20, including the Civil20 (C20) engagement group for civil society organisations, we will be keeping our distance. We don’t want to be part of a process that whitewashes Saudi Arabia’s dire human rights record.

Over the past years, we’ve been at G20 summits from Buenos Aires to Osaka, making policy recommendations and calling on leaders to keep their anti-corruption commitments. But we will not engage with a host state that disregards human rights and closes civic space until it is virtually non-existent. Saudi Arabia cannot be trusted to guarantee the basic conditions for international civil society to exchange ideas and collaborate freely.

While we will not participate in the C20 this year, we will keep working to make sure the voices of civil society are heard globally in 2020.

What do you think? Let us know @anticorruption.

News from Transparency International

banner2

Corruption Perceptions Index 2019 to be published on 23 January 2020

Next Thursday, we will be publishing the new Corruption Perceptions Index, highlighting the relationship between politics, money and corruption, with comparisons to data on political campaign finance transparency and the public’s access to decision-making. Stay tuned!

Index on Censorship, Reporters Without Borders UK and Transparency International UK urge Azerbaijan to lift journalist’s travel ban

Azerbaijan authorities should lift a travel ban against award-winning investigative journalist Khadija Ismayilova. Ismayilova was detained in December 2014 and sentenced in September 2015 to seven-and-a-half years in prison on trumped-up charges. She was conditionally released in May 2016, but three and a half years later, still remains subject to a travel ban and has been unable to leave the country despite numerous applications to do so.

New on Voices for Transparency

WEF annual meeting

A transparency roadmap to run a responsible business: 4 things that say you really mean it

As business leaders gather for WEF Annual Meeting, more transparent, fairer and responsible business models are needed if corporations are to prevent or mitigate corruption risks. Here are four key measures that would show companies are truly committed to a new way of doing business.

Corruption in the news this week

Angola: Isabel dos Santos: Africa’s richest woman eyes presidency
BBC News (16 January)

Croatia: Troika Laundromat: Unreal estate
OCCRP (13 January)

Guatemala: Officials arrested for corruption after leaving office
Al Jazeera (16 January, TI mention)

Uganda: Officials charged with corruption over award of Uganda refugee camp deals
The Guardian (17 January)

USA / Ukraine: Burisma: US firm says Russia hacked company at heart of Trump impeachment
BBC News (14 January)

Podcasts:

Global: Why did former Nissan boss Carlos Ghosn choose a life on the run?
The Guardian (13 January)

Ukraine: Why does Ukraine have such a corruption problem?
BBC Sounds podcast (16 January)

Tanzania: The Story of Maxence Melo and Jamii Forums
Whistleblower