In the public interest as part of freedom of speech. This subject is critical as it is being removed.

Please note the section and videos on Pedophilia, mind control and the protection of children are in the public interest.

What inspired this blog was the video from Parliament featuring the e-Safety Commissioner questioned by Senator Malcolm Roberts from One Nation.

The e-Safety Office is not under the Australian Constitution.

The website: https://www.esafety.gov.au/

The officer questioned is Julie Inman Grant who is promoted on the government website as Australia’s eSafety Commissioner. In this role it asserts Julie leads the world’s first government regulatory agency committed to keeping its citizens safer online.   

Wikipedia provides an outline of her background, this extract concerned me as it was my first thought:

“…After graduating from university in the early 1990s, Grant was offered a position as a “case agent with the CIA“, but declined the offer as it meant “I wouldn’t be able to tell my friends and family what I was doing”. Grant subsequently started working in the public sector as a policy adviser for United States Congressman John Miller in 1991 and 1992… From 1995 to 2000, Grant worked as a government affairs manager for Microsoft. In 2000, Grant moved to Australia,^[2] and became head of corporate affairs at Microsoft until 2004… In 2005, Grant became the Asia-Pacific director of internet safety, privacy and security at Microsoft,^[6] serving in that capacity until 2009 when she became global director for safety and privacy policy and outreach…. In January 2017, Grant was appointed by the Australian government as the national eSafety Commissioner,^[9] a position established in July 2015 by prime minister Tony Abbott..”

Note: Bill Gates has been summoned to court over Covid-19 injury and deaths and was accused in India of vaccine injuries. Why was she chosen by Tony Abbott who was a friend and supported George Pell, the Archbishop convicted of sexual abuse by the County Court (Victoria). This was later overturned by the High Court which is very concerning. Fiona Barnett had this to say:

“GeorgePell was present at one of my ritual abuse incidents at St. Mary’s cathedral Sydney when I was 14. GeorgePell ritually abused my friend James Shanahan, and signed a compensation approval for James being ritually abused by 2 Melbourne priests who ritually murdered a 5 yo child on an altar…” 

Yet a search for Tony Abbott and George Pell brings up so many links whereby Tony Abbott states he is a saint!

Abbott on Pell: ‘The greatest man I’ve ever known’ – Quadrant

It’s the celebration of a wonderful life, a once-in-a-generation gathering of the people of faith to re-dedicate ourselves to the ideals GeorgePell lived for, and to draw strength from each other for the struggles ahead. He was a priest, a bishop and the prefect of a Vatican Secretariat…

Tony Abbott hails George Pell as a SAINT at funeral

One of George Pell’s victims suicided. The reality behind the rhetoric to reverse spin crimes against children.

George Pell victim died from drug overdose before seeing his abuser …

A family watched as their son, who was molested as a choirboy by GeorgePell, declined into drugs and problems and finally a tragic end.

This is what happens when covering up industrial scale pedophilia. The denial is policy. Fiona said she was referred to as government property. This is how deep the rabbit hole goes.

Turning to the e-safety commissioner how do we know 100% that she is not a CIA agent given US history here. It makes sense given Silicon Valley is in Francisco and a major force driving digitisation in this transhumanist agenda is widely reported now. Our own intelligence agency leaders are not being given full access to National Security meetings as raised in parliament by Senator Paterson.

So what is the truth in these wicked webs so many are weaving? It ultimately will not serve them as we are indeed ONE. This may be hard for the CIA to get their heads around, but what you do to others returns is a universal lore we are here to learn if we want peace or utopia. None of this works. You cannot control nature is the reality that will assert itself in 2026. It is not our nature to harm children or each other. It is our nature to work together, to ensure real health, close families, respect, empathy as this is the very mirror we find ourselves. We see as we are not the world. Algorithms simply amplify the lies we tell ourselves and call true. Risk management is not conflict resolution or inner peace.

The video below has the tag line:

Australian’s soon to lose free speech as eSafety regulator returns from WEF to censure online speech

See the next blog where I post former NSW police who realised during Covid that the freedoms removed from the people were the same freedoms removed from him.

My question as an Australian national is:

What is the e-Commissioner’s relationship with the World Economic Forum?

This is important as the W.E.F. under Klaus Schwab promoted the Great Global Reset which is transforming our world into a technocracy where they envisage low employment, transhumanism, total information awareness, data gathering (all data), inclusive of addictive technology that children are being impacted by as they lose neural networks and social skills.

The WEF simulated the coronavirus pandemic in August 2019 just months prior to the WHO announcement of a Global Emergency of International Concern (not a pandemic).

Was this training given those involved were leaders in the real life alleged pandemic?

Was this to pave the way for the Global Reset as part of a New World Order plan?

WEF_Digital_Transformation_Powering_the_Great_Reset_2020

Is this about safety or surveillance as part of a technocracy?

Is this about democracy or dictatorship using technology?

Are children safe when technologies can track them, listen in on their conversations, create avatars, profile them, gather personal data, sell data to other actors and potentially criminalise them?

The media increasingly is profiling children as violent, apprehending them and incarcerating them with concerns about treating children as adults. This without any appraisal of poverty, work pressures, income, family breakdown and violent movies and gaming. Similarly, there appears a trend were women being depicted as violent (shooting, boxing, trials) as their image moves from innocence (upholders of values) to not so innocent to potentially change how they are seen and protected. This seems to feed into pre-crime predictive SMART policing where in the future the innocent could be falsely arrested and jailed or set up.

In 2020 a Police Conference presented by the Australia and New Zealand Police Commissioners. computing giant Microsoft about how digital transformation can help law enforcement agencies. This included the FBI (not mentioned). The two-day ANZPAA Police Conference – PC20 – will bring together 450+ current and future decision-makers and leaders in law enforcement from across Australia, New Zealand and the world. Hosted by the Police Commissioners from across Australia and New Zealand, PC20 is about Smart Connected Policing – law enforcement working more efficiently and effectively –internally, with our external partners and maximising enabling technology. As the world continues to change rapidly around us, we must work harder and smarter to outpace the increasingly sophisticated tools at the disposal of criminals and the complex environment in which we operate. Law enforcement is best positioned to overcome these hurdles by working closely with other government partners, industry, academia and – above all – the communities we serve.
Katherine Van Gurp, CEO ANZPAA

2025 Conference: https://www.anzpaa.org.au/

The Dangers of 5G and SMART military Deployment

Are you aware that SMART means Secret Militarised Armaments in Residential Technology? Is this safe for children? Refer Mark Steel, weapons expert. He has shown unbelievable courage as clearly he is very concerned. These technologies are unlawful, dangerous and causing health issues and death. This affects children who are on computers and iPhones and exposed in cities.

Was the decision to create age limits too late in respect of data gathering and profiling of children?

What of exposure levels causing cancer due to 3G, 4G to 5G and health effects including cancer?

Was the purpose of age restrictions to force adults to identify themselves given biometrics ID as part of Digital ID and to force identity when ‘we the people’ don’t the identity of other parties and how data is sold, shared and analysed?

Biometrics Patents

Who owns the biometrics patent? Is it appropriate for Richard Rothschild to own a patent that owns biometric technology? https://patents.justia.com/inventor/richard-a-rothschild The Rothchild family is identified in Fiona Barnett’s book (see below). Is that safe for children when they are identified on a computer or iPhone speaking to someone?

Representation of Australians by Australians

I note there are less and less Australian born parliamentarians. Parliamentarians, evidence is suggesting, are serving stakeholders not the Australian people. Departments have to undertake surveys for stakeholders but not the people. We have not been fully informed of who exactly is inside our government unelected and foreign based and nor do we have a say over digitisation and this technocracy that is removing our privacy and creating real security and safety concerns for this country. We need more information on lobbyists and if influence is being curried due to inappropriate friendship, allegiences, bribes within public-private contract relationships.

I was informed that police can’t investigate the parliamentarians by Australian Federal Police (renamed AFP) at Parliament. Are politicians above the law given high level contacts and a revolving door into industry after leaving office.

Is ASIO physically located at the Parliament in Canberra?

The Australian people reaffirmed and voted for a Constitutional government to represent us in 1999 referendum to ensure peace, order and good government. The people didn’t vote for a Republic.

Many are concerned about corruption and criminality which undermines public safety and representation and renders children particularly unsafe.

Children were healthy and they were then told they should get the vaccine. They were encouraged even without parental permission. Children and adults were harmed and some suddenly died as a result of experimental genetic therapies that had no 10 year safety trial. This was near to mandated by the government who were partners with big Pharma and not neutral government expected to protect public wellbeing.

There are issues of compromise of politicians in the government at the highest levels that are not resolved or acted on by police to ensure the accused face a court of law. Hate speech issues will evaporate when criminality is put before justice. much of the anger is about genocide, fears of a takeover and the attack on Australians due to COVID-19. Most are not going to be happy, peaceful but demanding of answers that you cannot suppress and criminalise You have to resolve conflict and put in place Truth and Reconciliation Commissions without watering down crimes, not dissimilar to South Africa, as follows:

https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/

If that doesn’t happen, yes more will become very angry and then they become criminalised for crimes others have committed to make them wrong and deflect blame. This is not a wise move.

Can we trust the government to protect children given pedophilie allegations?

Pedophile Rings in Government, Authority and Criminal Cartels

Former Senator Bill Heffernan’s Disclosures of Pedophiles Ignored in 2015

Of course the big issue for children is their safety given MP Bill Heffernan’s concerns.

Are children safe online at all give pedophile rings at the highest levels, inclusive of the Australian Government as reported by Senator MP Heffernan in 2015?

Fiona Barnett was the informant mentioned by MP Heffernan exposing high level figures as pedophiles. She also stated that Justice Wood was also involved in pedophilia. He was unreliable. The above Attorney General George Brandis appointed Rosalind Croucher to the Australian Human Rights Commission, who now in 2025 was appointed NSW Information Commissioner. She was mentioned as Fiona’s abuser at Bathurst. Fiona’s story and book is below:

The evidence provided to the Wood Royal Commission was reported to police. She produced a book ‘Eyes Wide Open’ revealing the corruption and abuse not only in government, but military, listing most Prime Ministers and popular celebrities, sports icons, scientists, psychologists etc. Most Australians would be horrified to learn those they most admired and loved were involved in child sexual abuse.

https://burners.me/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/eyes-wide-open-_fiona-barnett_first-edition_august-2019.pdf

Shane Dowling published ‘Pedophile Protection Racket’.

National Library of Australia now have a copy of Australia’s Paedophile Protection Racket and a review from a UK Barrister

I note PayPal is on his website which is outing corrupt judges. See blog on PayPal Mafia. That exposes visitors who buy the book to being surveilled unwittingly.

This is why this subject is extremely important to ensure the safety of children. With negative intentions arising from lineages of child abuse seeking to use compromise to reach objectives of global control. It is evident technology and corruption makes children unsafe and destructive policies can destroy a child’s life. It is very sad to learn of the terrorism of children by actors traumatising them with violent images (gaming), expose them to inappropriate violence/sexual themes/no morals to shape them and confusing them about being a boy or girl normalising ‘same sex’ as a political step not a simple education (later on) when kids recognise they may be attracted to the same sex. It is better to couch this education in anti-bullying rather than amplifying through ‘suggestion’ as kids are impressionable, as are adults.

As a result of technology teachers have reported children are less able to read properly (dumbed down), some unaware of social norms (socialisation, appropriate behaviour), silicon valley algorithm feeds amplifying whatever is looked at, data gathering and profiling which pre-crime algorithms, according to journalist Whitney Webb is often inaccurate. They have no say nor comprehension of ‘whole-of-life tracking and any mistakes recorded without forgiveness (delete) or deidentification. They are innocent and vulnerable in a cyber world full of actors who want to profit from ‘users’ who in the film Social Dilemma states are the target (if it is free they are the product). This comes down to data as the new gold and money incentivising decisions not the best interests of a evolving civilisation. It is all about the money not public safety and real needs here.

Mind control is a real issue that lays down early conditioning that a child would find hard to reverse as an adult as it is programming.

Evidence from MK-Ultra victims like Cathy O’Brien in her book Trance-formation. She describes first hand what it is like to be mind controlled by those compromising politicians using mind control slaves. Slavery is a key issue.

The video is in the public interest and mandatory viewing.

The key takeaways:

If you control a person’s mind you control everything. This is the game.

Love is the answer.

Extract from Mark Phillips Introductions:

“…Cathy is introduced by Mark Phillips, who is a rare man who actually saved her. He had a military intelligence background who took huge risks to rescue her from the ring. He witnessed her abuse and became the one who deprogrammed her. They fell in love. For her it was the first time, as sex was abuse for her. Sadly as a whistleblower he was killed. He speaks about the word ‘conspiracy’ and the fact that co-conspirators, exposing conspiracies ‘to and through’ the media, depicted as having a problem in their persona or lying if exposing the ones locking others upon this charge. He discusses Hitler and his vision of the ultimate weapon which was not nuclear but mind control. He discusses psychological/blood trauma’s and physical abuse of children by satanist families. The parents abused their own child. This is prior to 5 years of age. He describes dissociative identity disorder or multiple personality disorder, nothing further from the truth. There is one persona, it can be fragmented, shattered, professionally compartmentalised, projections etc. Hitler a the largest pool of human guinea pigs. He was doing this to accomplish the New World Order. it was stolen from Nero. They sought to clinically understand how offspring psychologically/ sexually/ physically abuse were developing 44 x improved visual acuity, they saw it could be applied in special forces (super soldiers). They had photographic memories. It is easy to tell the truth, that bothered Adolf, the ultimate weapon is to control the mind of the people. He didn’t want people to tell the truth or know they were lying. He wanted to be the puppet master for the NWO. He was told not to call it mind control but behavioural modification. George Bush stood on stage and said this was the beginning of a New World Order. The admiral in charge of the Seal team 6 stand up and say he answered only to the President of US and NWO. If you control a person’s mind you control everything. Freedom of thought is mankind’s last remaining freedom and it has been eroded seriously… it used to be religions in soft mind control then it was hard mind control they call them cults. Now all of us are subject to mind control. History has been changed. Newspapers … greatly spun and changed so we don’t get the truth… This conference should be 100 x the size that it is. People who think they are free are at the games by 10’s of thousands, you guys are enjoying the remnants of freedom of thought. He speaks of Project Paperclip was the importation of 600-700 Nazi/Fascists scientists, engineers into the US. It was sanctioned by Congress. Mark viewed the Soviet Union not as an enemy but in a technology race. Congress allowed these people to be put into These Nazi’s were put into universities, military industrial complex, transportation and communications, rockets. There were psychologists/psychiatrists in Mind Control research, US Government deemed it ‘secret’ 1947, the same year CIA, Roswell, the launched the National Security Act. They want to see the repeal of the National Security Act. Not one person in the audience that could not be experimented on, killed, you have no resource – zero, as long as the National Security Act in place. Espionage was non-stop. It turned someone highly paid to now work for nothing...”

I was repeatedly asked for ID by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). Even a legal letter validating my identity appeared not enough. Even though under FOI I do not have to but they continued to use ‘personal information’ as the rationale when I hadn’t asked for personal information in my FOI request to Prime Minister and Cabinet. I just wanted to know if any information had come to/from them as I hold concerns about corruption and safety issues.

I sent to the OAIC a video with my mother who said she gave birth to me and I am who I say I am. I consider her a higher authority. That should be sufficient but I could see ID was used as a tactic not a bonifide request.

I came to learn that ID was falsely used to force me to contract by showing a licence as they are corporatised with an ABN. Even officers within OAIC had ABN’s which means they can be contracted to other departments. This is what was not disclosed openly to ensure I was given informed consent.

They came to me again shortly after with another delayed FOI request I had sent to the Department of Health. I asked for their ID before we could continue, they referred me to their website. I asked for a legal letter to be sure. That didn’t happen. They went ahead without consent and changed my FOI allowing actors within the government (private) to search for my name linked to Covid-19. It became about data gathering. I told them I didn’t approve that and nothing happened.

So the facades we are confronting becomes very visible when you start to ask questions and expect the other party to declare who they are. When they don’t then concerns arise.

I no longer will provide my licence to contract (business to business – corporate ID) to anyone as I am not interested in private sector actors, but want to liaise with the official government voted in by the people.

I am in a homeless capacity and I was cut off Centrelink because I refused to go onto a disability pension as I am not disabled. I had been going through a very difficult issue where it was hard to continue on at the time. They knew my distress and they nonetheless cut me off for not complying with what they want. It became evident they had no conscience or legal due diligence to ensure I was safe and had enough income to survive. They clearly didn’t care. That is why today I am not on Centrelink as I know my welfare is disregarded. So I trust life instead.

Another case was security at Federal Parliament refusing my entry to the Parliament without ID. I lived in Canberra and never had been asked for ID over the years. So they demanded this. I didn’t even have a bag with me as I was going to the first sitting of Albanese government question time. My blog at the time is at the link as follows:

Citizen Denied Entry to 47th Federal Parliament and No Consent to Show ID for No Reason

I regard the request for ID is part of Bill Gates ID2020 which is about identifying people and tracking them. This is being reported as a digital dictatorship of which I didn’t vote. Under this type of regime there is no judicial system, there are targeted individuals who have not committed a crime but may have said ‘no’ to something that may harm them or via false algorithms (0.5%) pre-crime predictability where they were identified incorrectly and then forced to go to a doctor or be locked down. This is injustice and circumvents habeus corpus (put before a court) and equality before the law. It reveals lawlessness.

Digital ID: Tool of Exclusion | Whitney Webb

The vulnerability in governments around the world is allowing contractors to take over public services. In the IT area they get access to public information and then can utilise their technology to surveil and track the public using pre-emptive crime narratives to justify the invasion of privacy and potential criminalisation of innocent people.

Journalist Whitney Webb outlines this technocratic takeover and author of her book One Nation Under Blackmail. Her website is Unlimited Hangout refer https://unlimitedhangout.com/ and search for pod casts.

This blog arose out of questions in a Senate hearing regarding the photo-shopping to remove the Australian flag out of a photo of senior staff in the Australian Government. This single decision can be minimised but it was indeed a powerful symbol regarding sovereignty and allegiance to the Commonwealth of Australia.

In the Australian Senate, Senator Paterson in the video below, refers to a change in the photographs of senior departmental officials on the Home Affairs website. The date of this Senate hearing was 4 November 2024.

What was astounding was Stephanie Foster’s response as she confirmed she asked her staff to remove the Australian flags behind senior executives. Senator Paterson asks for the reason? She wanted photos to be less formal. He says the only change is the flags removal.

The Australian flag sends a message that Senior staff represent the Australian people, to remove the flag sends a informal message that they senior staff do not represent Australia. If that is the case, who do they represent?

I find this highly concerning as an Australian and this disclosure should have evoked an investigation into her background. The problem is, who will investigate?

Is this why the Australian flag was taken out of the photos?

What is the Background of the Secretary of Department of Home Affairs?

Her name (above) is Stephanie Foster PSM (medal) she was appointed as Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs on 28 November 2023. She has formerly been in a Secretariat role in Immigration, Prime Minister and Cabinet and Defence Signals Directorate. She has an intelligence background. Stephanie joined the Department of Home Affairs in October 2022 as Associate Secretary Immigration. Stephanie led the delivery of Immigration Operations, Immigration Policy, Refugee Policy and Programs, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs, Legal and Service Design and Delivery Programs. Prior to this, Stephanie was Deputy Secretary Governance at the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet in December 2017, where she was responsible for the effective operations of the Executive Branch of Government, management of Cabinet and Cabinet Committees, advancing the government’s legislative program. In 2021, Stephanie led a review into practices in parliamentary workplaces related to serious incidents and subsequently implemented recommendations, including the establishment of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service. Stephanie also implemented Government recommendations in the Set the Standard: Report on the Independent Review into Commonwealth Parliamentary Workplaces aimed at making Commonwealth parliamentary workplaces safer and more respectful. Stephanie began her journey in the APS in 1987 as a graduate at the Defence Signals Directorate where she went on to spend 16 years working in a range of analytic and management roles. Stephanie spent four years as First Assistant Secretary of Defence’s International Policy Division, providing policy support to overseas operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Solomon Islands and East Timor, and managed the Defence Cooperation Program and the Global Network of Defence Attachés. Stephanie has a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) from Monash University. Stephanie was awarded the Public Service Medal in 2008 for her policy support to Australian Defence Force deployments overseas, and the French Officier de l’Ordre National du Merite in 2010 for her work to develop defence relations between France and Australia.

Why does Home Affairs have a Business Number?

Home Affairs appears to be modelled on Homeland Security in the US. It is not in the Australian Constitution, it is a department that has been set up in 2017. It has a Australian Business Number Current details for ABN 33 380 054 835. This is not allowed under the Constitution. See link. https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=33380054835

A quick look at a few trading companies under the Department of Home Affairs. They appear to be trading in the business of migration, that means visas for foreigners to ENTER the country. This looks to me about bringing people into the country. This raises issues of crowding out Australian nationals and citizens here. I have no issue with immigration personally as multiculturalism adds to this country, but if it is being done as a means of taking over a country, that is a national security matter. It is noteworthy that the Department of Immigration has shifted emphasis form citizenship to border protection which gives more intelligence powers. Below are trading names and acronyms.

Trading name	From
DIAC	09 Aug 2007
MARA	01 Jul 2009
Migration Agents Registration Authority	01 Jul 2009
Office of Migration Agents Registration Authority	01 Jul 2009
Office of the MARA	01 Jul 2009
TIS	28 Nov 2007
TIS National	28 Nov 2007
Translating and Interpreting Service	28 Nov 2007

The focus is Migration which I would expect to be Foreign Affairs and Trade.

MARA – Office of the Migration Agents Registration Authority https://www.mara.gov.au/

DIAC – Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

The Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) is now The Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP). https://www.themigrationplace.com/department-immigration-citizenship-diac-now-department-immigration-border-protection-dibp/ (The immigrationplace.com)

I just visited www.immigrationplace.com and the screenshot is below. This appears a business. Therefore, profit becomes a priority. This becomes a vulnerability in relation to national security as money (bribes) can be taken for citizenship.

Are Politicians Giving Special Privileges to Foreigners to Enter and Gain Citizenship in Australia?

I recall years ago the scandal whereby Chinese Communist Party-aligned billionaire Huang Xiangmo paid tens of thousands of dollars to former Liberal minister Santo Santoro while mounting a back-room campaign to secure Australian citizenship. An investigation by Four Corners, The Age and Sydney Morning Herald can also reveal that in 2015, Mr Dutton gave approval for then-Labor MP Sam Dastyari to conduct a private citizenship ceremony for Mr Huang’s wife and two children. Refer link below.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/turnbull-demands-dutton-explain-dealings-with-chinese-billionaire/d2rksb3ho

This appears to be helping migrants to become Australian citizens. Is this why the flag was taken down?

Note: The name changed from citizenship to border protection (homeland security). Is that why the flag was removed? Would that be a focus on terrorism away from citizenship?

March for Australia rallies held across the country | Media

I recall when Malcolm Turnbull was in Government, La Trobe University Risk Manager Carl Gibson suspended Ros Ward (Safe Schools Coordinator) for her statement on Facebook where she declared she wanted to take down the Australian flag and put up the rainbow flag. Most Australians missed this but it was a declaration of a takeover. The agenda with Safe Schools was not antibullying but more a focus on males dressing as females. There has been significant push back given children are too young and this type of suggestion could confuse them about their sex. This flag statement was amplified by the New Internationalist and put Safe Schools on the agenda. Ros Ward was represented by the union and later reinstated.

I noticed recently on a website the image of the rainbow LBGTI flag, Aboriginal and Torres Strait flag and no Australian flag. It caught my attention. As below:

In the screenshot from the link below extracted form the video describes the line up of flags outside a Council (see below). This was inclusive of a Council flag and LBGTI flag. The former suggests a city-state and the latter is political (impacts female identity and space). Flags are about nation states and allegiances. So this trend raises questions.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/mornington-peninsula-shire-council-in-damage-control-after-replacing-australian-flag-with-lgbtq-pride-flag-on-school-flyer/news-story/238a961b5b42f39a7df59517630edc49

The issue that seem to be flushed out here is who represents the Australian people?

It raises questions (without notice):

Is this about a takeover by foreign actors or sovereignty?

What role does Home Affairs play is it government or corporate?

Is Home Affairs run for profit or funded by tax revenues?

Are Australian nationals/citizens safe if there is infiltration reframing patriotism/nationalism/sovereignty as domestic terrorism if people get upset?

Should this be scrutinised by those who have sworn an oath under the Constitution to the Commonwealth of Australia and to ensure due diligence undertaken by those with integrity loyal to all Australians (equally) ie. politicians, Australian defence, intelligence community and police?

We are in interesting times, unprecedented. Tonight has been an eye opener and reminder to stay vigilant.

These videos show how the public are not fully informed. It seems to be common practice to ‘not know enough’, not been briefed, didn’t know, administrative error, put on notice and on and on it goes. Makes me think of Yes Minister. Facts complicate things, people want to know who is the goodies and the badies. Avoid discussion of foreign affairs.

The following videos show women as the public face more and more. It shows the art of not answering, not committing, not informed and on it goes. Ignorance is bliss.

Should American’s pay tax on unrealised capital gain (e.g. real estate rises in value but not sold). The Real Estate sector has created an economic environment where the few profit over the many in buying and selling Real Estate (money for nothing). It also creates huge pressures on income as mortgages rise. It has impacts on affordability of rentals and homelessness. Its all about the money. What of where taxes are spent which places pressure on the public to pay more tax.

This is interesting below. The Government removed Director’s General of ASIO and ASIS as regular attendees as the National Security Committee of Cabinet and only invited on a case by case basis. I find this very concerning.

How is it possible that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister or Foreign Minister can speak on behalf of the Prime Minister? Why doesn’t the Prime Minister answer himself or a Secretary in his Department. Who is the power here?

Why did Senator Wong say both DGs of both of those organisations? Strange answer. She is not being specific. This looks deceptive to me. She is not being asked if they are professional, but why they are not regular attendees of the NSC of Cabinet.

Secretary of the Department of Climate Change Energy Environment and Water now a regular attendee at the National Security Committee of Cabinet? Why does the government think he has superior insights on national security to the Inspector Generals? This is of real concern as Climate is a Global Reset agenda that many are realising is about control not democracy. Geoengineering is a big issue. I hold concerns of foreign infiltration and agendas not arising from the Australian public.

We need transparency and to be fully informed. It is a different reality for the public who watch this as if spectators in a collesium not represented by politicians. Increasingly we feel excluded in a democracy.

Below is the ISIS brides issue which is another area of concern. It is a case of answering but not answering. It reveals fear.

Penny Wong’s response does not convince me that she is transparent.

Taking it on notice or reading scripts reflecting sensitivity of issues and keeping within the rules. They are not transparent to the public for reasons most don’t know or understand.

Is DFAT under the Australian Constitution?

Home Affairs Secretary. She is not prepared, why? Transparency is to answer questions and tabling documents and informing the public so we are aware of how government is functioning and on behalf of who? Is Home Affairs under the Australian Constitution?

Treasury $2.3 billion unlawful payments raised. Public servant not aware. Even though reported 2024/2025. He is aware of media. Breach of finance law. Not unusual??

Housing is a core issue. The economy was often measured by housing as a sign of confidence. Today there are private sector actors involved which distorts demand and supply and the cost of housing and ownership. What happens when Australians homes are bought up by private/foreign actors. Why is government not buying public housing?

Public interest IMMUNITY is claimed as to why not to release a Housing Report (investigation). This is viewed as secrecy.

No briefing…

Does this answer key questions in time. Black Rock, State Street and Vanguard own each other. They own everything. They are buying ever single family home in the US. He references to the Global Reset and estimates 60% of homes owned by Black Rock, State Street and Vanguard 2030. Larry Fink is on the Board of World Economic Forum. They promote “You will own nothing and be happy.”

1.2 million homes target. Only have September quarter data – 43, 848 houses BUILT. Last year 177,000 and something.

Question: Who owns the housing if Department’s have ABNs? What of contractors? Why is VANguard inside the government?

Labor’s built no homes – so they’re acquiring them instead.

My parents were in public housing in Canberra. Most houses in Canberra were owned by the government. The house sold in the 1980’s for around $80,000 then housing prices skyrocket to something like $300,000 some years later, not based on demand or supply but foreign investors buying up real estate. This is what made housing unaffordable and a boon for investors and real estate agents. As large investors invest, what happens when a shock like Covid-19 comes and everyone is locked down and many default on loans.? Who gets the asset? Who get’s the land? The investors or government?

That would be my question if I had a voice.

Notes from above video ‘Paying investors isn’t a building cost‘:

Round 1 tender and awarding it. The Board of Housing Australia decides which organisations would get funding. Two funding mechanisms 1) concessional loan (upfront capital cost) 2) annual availability payment over 25 years. Availability payments may be the reason for the higher prices. Average cost of a house is half a million. $1.3 million in Geelong, $1 million Shepperton, Melbourne/Sydney $800,000 more than average cost of new build due to availability payments is the question. It covers capital, operating, tenancy management (service models) for a cohort. Is land a part of this? $1 million per house (double average cost of new house). Give Catholic Care $43 million to build 43 houses, cost of over $1 million per house. How much of the money goes to availability payments? Average total development cost in HAF program $690,000. When you think in today’s terms the value of concession loan and availability payment contribution in today’s terms $535,000. Right comparison total development cost $690,000 plus operational costs for 25 years and rent discount for social housing renters compared against $535,000. Missing the subsidy you pay investors ‘availability payment’. The availability payments go to a charity. Senator says in conjunction with investors.

This suggests the cost of housing is rising due to payments to investors. It is believed that investors should be involved in developing social and affordable housing, getting value for money out of ‘limited’ government resources. This is social impact investing. A company called Assemble received $2.2 billion, it is not a charity it is owned by Hesta and Australian Super. Your fund is paying them a subsidy. They can’t invest unless a decent return. How much public money are you giving investors? Is this why we have limited resources?

Are the Houses publicly owned or privately owned? That is a key question. Rents and mortgages are rising and more people end up homeless.

This is of concern.

Modelling – additional emissions to abate changes. If we need 107 million tonnes carbon abatement (21 tonnes per hectare carbon abatement) that would be 5 million hectares Senator Canavan. Information put together and close collaboration with colleagues. ABARES is mentioned Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Emission reduction functions. Rural farmers concerns about loss of productive farm land in productive food growing areas and loss of rural communities. Will this impact our food supply? Farmers are losing property rights, as are we all. Climate is part of the Global Reset.

Private actors contracting in public-private partnerships may be the reason why secrecy is increasing.