Author Archives: Peacefull

Robo Cops Replacing Our Hardworking Police Who Serve the Community

I vote for police not robots. I vote for more training of police to solve problems via conflict resolution in addition to law enforcement. The society is more complex today, young people are not getting the proper role modelling they need and escaping into iPhones and making mistakes as they have no idea how to BE in a community.

There are many structural factors that feed into anti-social behaviour, drug abuse, unemployment and loss of self. These are the drivers of crime, disrespect and deep hurt that many do not reveal. Many homeless are angry at themselves, feel vulnerable and put up a front to appear tough, but deep down they are scared. We need to understand the social emotional landscape which no robot can possibly understand.

Dogs are being chipped and tracked in the name of not losing your dog. I see it as experimentation leading up to the chipping of people. The previous blog spoke to AI, SMART cities and 5G, Mark Steele, a weapons expert makes clear it is weaponised and this creates risks to human health and safety. Chipping means drones can target no matter where you are. Think of the murdered Ukrainians treated as cannon fodder not respect by those profiting from false flag wars. They are indeed hacking the brain. How do people feel to know that their thoughts are gathered. This is where Thought Police comes in. These are themes from George Orwell’s 1984. Refer https://bookanalysis.com/1984/thought-police/

A quote from the analysis of 1984:
It’s the job of the Thought Police to spy on the citizens of Oceania. They do so by looking through the telescreens (or televisions) in everyone’s home, reading peoples’ body language, listening to the tenor of their speech, and reading facial expressions. When writing about the Thought Police towards the beginning of the novel, Orwell penned the following quote in 1984:

Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by the telescreen; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was, of course, no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork.

I do not consent to being chipped as I want and NEED my privacy. I am not an object, I am not a corporate actor. I am not owned by anyone, I come under devine lore. I am a living breathing woman and under divine lore I am self determining. I am not created by biotechnology no matter changes to DNA and biology. This is done quietly without consent. We have scientists going for the money (patents) and not driven by a desire to advance humanity. We have biotech millionaires such as Elon Musk who calls his children ‘batches’, has them wear all ‘white’ and conveying no personal identity. I am told he has chipped his kids. Adults could be tempted to do this but they condemn their children to a live of being controlled not free to live their own lives and allow life to take its course. We cannot force life or death, we can only support and share with them imparting the wisdom to make their own decisions and learn from mistakes.

There are karmic implications for those engaging in harm against humanity. These shifts will increasingly occur as any form of violence is out of alignment with nature (Gaia is living and breathing and senses all change). The earth systems are highly sensitive and human activity is not in harmony. If we created ecovillages that were self determining, zero energy, as the public learn how to work and live together in a community. Governance is not unlike indigenous elders or wise counsel. What happens is a a peaceful society, corrected when anti-social, emerges as we learn responsibility and sharing. This is a community that does not need to be controlled or surveilled by foreign actors who care nothing for public wellbeing and happiness.

If you want peace, model it. If you want non-violence then don’t be violent. If you want to be loved then love others. If you want freedom give it. If you want respect then give respect to another. Give away what you want and it returns. That is a natural lore. Nature brings to you what you put out into the world as your vote. What you think about you bring about in life and that is the reality of change that is not predictable even by AI.

Whence Chip Implants: From Brain Bluetooth To ‘Full RoboCop”

Posted By: Amin Al-Habaibeh via Study Finds April 14, 2025

Please Share This Story!Download this post…Brain Bluetooth, providing near real-time access to the brain, might be the key to “planted memories and built-in trained skills supported with internet connectivity.” Of course, the chatter about this kind of breakthrough is all about helping the paralyzed but the darker Technocrat agenda is about controlling the human brain in the first place; in other words, “hacking the brain.” ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.

In the 1987 classic film RoboCop, the deceased Detroit cop Alex Murphy is reborn as a cyborg. He has a robotic body and a full brain-computer interface that allows him to control his movements with his mind. He can access online information such as suspects’ faces, uses artificial intelligence (AI) to help detect threats, and his human memories have been integrated with those from a machine.

It is remarkable to think that the movie’s key mechanical robotic technologies have almost now been accomplished by the likes of Boston Dynamics’ running, jumping Atlas and Kawasaki’s new four-legged Corleo. Similarly we are seeing robotic exoskeletons that enable paralyzed patients to do things like walking and climbing stairs by responding to their gestures.

Developers have lagged behind when it comes to building an interface in which the brain’s electrical pulses can communicate with an external device. This too is changing, however.

In the latest breakthrough, a research team based at the University of California has unveiled a brain implant that enabled a woman with paralysis to livestream her thoughts via AI into a synthetic voice with just a three-second delay.

The concept of an interface between neurons and machines goes back much further than RoboCop. In the 18th century, an Italian physician named Luigi Galvani discovered that when electricity is passed through certain nerves in a frog’s leg, it would twitch. This paved the way for the whole study of electrophysiology, which looks at how electrical signals affect organisms.

The initial modern research on brain-computer interfaces started in the late 1960s, with the American neuroscientist Eberhard Fetz hooking up monkeys’ brains to electrodes and showing that they could move a meter needle. Yet if this demonstrated some exciting potential, the human brain proved too complex for this field to advance quickly.

The brain is continually thinking, learning, memorizing, recognizing patterns and decoding sensory signals – not to mention coordinating and moving our bodies. It runs on about 86 billion neurons with trillions of connections which process, adapt and evolve continuously in what is called neuroplasticity. In other words, there’s a great deal to figure out.

Much of the recent progress has been based on advances in our ability to map the brain, identifying the various regions and their activities. A range of technologies can produce insightful images of the brain (including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)), while others monitor certain kinds of activity (including electroencephalography (EEG) and the more invasive electrocortigraphy (ECoG)).

These techniques have helped researchers to build some incredible devices, including wheelchairs and prosthetics that can be controlled by the mind.

But whereas these are typically controlled with an external interface like an EEG headset, chip implants are very much the new frontier. They have been enabled by advances in AI chips and micro electrodes, as well as the deep learning neural networks that power today’s AI technology. This allows for faster data analysis and pattern recognition, which together with the more precise brain signals that can be acquired using implants, have made it possible to create applications that run virtually in real-time.

For instance, the new University of California implant relies on ECoG, a technique developed in the early 2000s that captures patterns directly from a thin sheet of electrodes placed directly on the cortical surface of someone’s brain.

In their case, the complex patterns picked up by the implant of 253 high-density electrodes are processed using deep learning to produce a matrix of data from which it’s possible to decode whatever words the user is thinking. This improves on previous models that could only create synthetic speech after the user had finished a sentence.

Elon Musk’s Neuralink has been able to get patients to control a computer cursor using similar techniques. However, it’s also worth emphasizing that deep learning neural networks are enabling more sophisticated devices that rely on other forms of brain monitoring.

Our research team at Nottingham Trent University has developed an affordable brainwave reader using off-the-shelf parts that enables patients who are suffering from conditions like completely locked-in syndrome (CLIS) or motor neurone disease (MND) to be able to answer “yes” or “no” to questions. There’s also the potential to control a computer mouse using the same technology.

The future

The progress in AI, chip fabrication and biomedical tech that enabled these developments is expected to continue in the coming years, which should mean that brain-computer interfaces keep improving.

In the next ten years, we can expect more technologies that provide disabled people with independence by helping them to move and communicate more easily. This entails improved versions of the technologies that are already emerging, including exoskeletons, mind-controlled prosthetics and implants that move from controlling cursors to fully controlling computers or other machines. In all cases, it will be a question of balancing our increasing ability to interpret high-quality brain data with invasiveness, safety and costs.

It is still more in the medium to long term that I would expect to see many of the capabilities of a RoboCop, including planted memories and built-in trained skills supported with internet connectivity. We can also expect to see high-speed communication between people via “brain Bluetooth.”

It should be similarly possible to create a Six Million Dollar Man, with enhanced vision, hearing and strength, by implanting the right sensors and linking the right components to convert neuron signals into action (actuators). No doubt applications will also emerge as our understanding of brain functionality increases that haven’t been thought of yet.

Clearly, it will soon become impossible to keep deferring ethical considerations. Could our brains be hacked, and memories be planted or deleted? Could our emotions be controlled? Will the day come where we need to update our brain software and press restart?

With every step forward, questions like these become ever more pressing. The major technological obstacles have essentially been cleared out of the way. It’s time to start thinking about to what extent we want to integrate these technologies into society, the sooner the better.

Read full story here…

Adelaide Rolling Out AI S.M.A.R.T. Management Systems, Privacy, 5G, Health Impacts Not Solving Deep Societal Problems

For myself, I do not feel cameras are solving problems, as a woman I see them as invading our privacy with the ability to tap into iPhones, lighting, CCTV where you feel watched all the time. For me it is like being stalked and tracked given the profit motivation of ‘data as the new gold’ and this endless focus on data sharing (sales) where consumer profiling maximises profits. I do not believe it is about safety.

I notice cameras change my behaviour as I avoid LED Lights to maintain my privacy. I try not to look at cameras (facial recognition) whilst shopping and do not appreciate being watched. I do not regard this as about theft, but more watching the public. I angle myself away from lighting in toilets as they too are cameras and for me it is like a group of men watching me on the toilet, I absolutely feel this is outrageous. I feel my privacy completely invaded by those who have commoditised our society as ‘consumers’ and dismissed our humanity and democracy as a shared community. I did not vote for this, I do not feel safer. I believe jobs will go as AI replaces all activity. They will bring in a Universal Basic Income and promote leisure but the reality is depopulation ideologies are implemented as Bill Gates stated in his famous TED talk. He sought to reduce population by 15% using vaccines. In reality this is not for safety of the community it is a form of totalitarianism pushed by foreign actors. AI replaces police, replaces workers as it is free labour and is believed to be superior to humans and without all the emotional issues that those in leadership do not know how to deal with. As life is about control not sharing, caring, healing and revealing. To force anything on anyone is not respect but a violation, especially when the human becomes dehumanised via data.

AI makes human beings redundant by those who see humans as labour not a community to serve. Economics was designed to serve the needs and wants of a society, it was not about the society serving the needs and wants of industry. The privatisation of our government and services means that profit motives displaced a public service. This is the reality beneath all the so-called benefits and colourful ‘happy’ advertising. It is a control grid, it triangulates vehicles, it tracks, it listens in, gains data in real time and it uses facial recognition to identify people engaged in their normal lives without consent or valid legal reason.

I do not consent to Smart Cities as part of Infrastructure and the fact it has been brought in without referendum with compliant regulators who do not enforce privacy and deny access if a complainant is deemed non-compliant (discretionary decisions). Privacy is wellbeing coupled with the right to not be known, to have our personal data disidentified, to speak our political opinions without profiling or surveillance by faceless actors looking for disinformation not freedom of speech of which they enjoy. To be free to be ‘who we are’ without control exercised by those who profit from this creating a quality of life akin to a surveillance police state. I don’t vote for this as it is driven by profit not public safety or efficiency. I vote for privacy and basic respect.

If you want to ease congestion create flexi-time where you log in when you get to work, work 8 hours and then log out. This was used years ago in the public service. What this means is people do their hours when convenient. Others will work from home. This changes traffic conditions and congestion as everyone is different and prefers different hours. It is about working together not forcing the public into a compliance model.

As for drunk drivers or those affected by drugs, solve the social problems that causes excessive drinking or drug taking. Look at family break up, cost of living pressures, stress, powerlessness, overworking, unhappiness and so on. This is the pink elephant no AI camera will detect. If you want to stop theft then create an egalitarian society where all benefit equally, ensure real wealth is distributed fairly without exploitation and do not allow the concentration of wealth using IT fishnets that profit not because the product is demanded but more access to audiences and cheaper due to cheap labour in poorer countries. This impacts local business and collapses it, weakening the nation. How are IT billionnaires justified in comparison to plumbers or tradies, how do you value worth of the people based on status? One has access to a large market by investing in IT platforms (data capture), the other unblocks physical pipes, replaces washes, ensure the practical function of necessary services. One works harder than the other who pays for what he or she wants. Many profit these days by buying up successful products and services (mergers & takeovers), rather than inventing them to serve a public need. Superannuation created access to global funds rather than creating retirement income for the elderly. It was directed to raise finance to invest in areas private sector actors chose not the public. They did not earn the money but managed it, this gave them power to shape change our society and world. They had influence over politicians as they coordinated their own global strategies to maximise profits and control. The monies were not invested back into the national economy but rather used to build infrastructure owned by private corporations not the public. This money was the forfeited wage increases by those who need the money to those who have plenty of money. It was enriching the global financiers at the expense of ordinary people underpaid and overworked. So we observe ‘self interest’ being the driver rather than ‘best interest’. This boils down to those who do not know how to serve others but only know being served. They do not have the experience of working with others as equals but rather managing money not relationships. This is why we are experiencing inequality, poverty, ecological imbalance, class systems and homelessness particularly notable in rich countries like Australia (second richest in the world). It becomes inequality not victim blaming (didn’t work hard enough) when wages are held down, some to 1980 rates of pay. The worker has no real advocacy as unions become controlled. The list goes on.

Is it SMART cities or intelligent?

Lastly, it is important to know that SMART means Secret Militarised Armaments in Residential Areas and 5G is weaponised. That should be of concern. A video about this is below this article. The commentator is Mark Steele who is an ex military weapons expert.

This subject is most definitely in the public interest.

AI-driven ‘smart management’ cameras coming to SA roads

AI cameras are being rolled out on some of Adelaide’s busiest roads as a means to reportedly ‘improve traffic management’ and ‘ease congestion’.

The surveillance grid expands.
Photo: FUY

More ‘smart initiatives’ rolled out.

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING

Major Adelaide roads will get artificial intelligence cameras aimed at ‘cutting traffic’ and ‘boosting economic activity’, at a cost of $350,000 to taxpayers.

South Australian Transport Minister Tom Koutsantonis said the new trial would involve the cameras analysing congestion and tweaking traffic light cycles.

“They’ll save of course time and money in terms of infrastructure, time and money in terms of being stuck in traffic, freight getting to where it’s needed to go faster and more efficiently, public transport moving more quickly,” Koutsantonis said.

Koutsantonis described the technology as a “powerful piece of equipment to improve our traffic network” when announcing the new trial.

One camera will go on the highway at the northern suburb of Penfield, and another will be placed at the major bus station, Paradise Interchange, in the northeast suburbs. Another two will go on the highway at the far-southern suburb of Old Noarlunga.

The government says traffic congestion costs the economy $33,000 for every 5000 motorists forced to wait in 20 minutes of traffic. That’s a very precise (and symbolic) number.

“The traffic management system using artificial intelligence can cost as little as $8000 at an intersection if the infrastructure is already in place without having to put in new infrastructure,” Koutsantonis continued.

The government will look to add more cameras if the trial is successful.

Adelaide, which already has smart infrastructure installed (like all major cities in Australia), is looking to upgrade the network with an AI supercharge overlay. Entire networks run by sophisticated algorithms.Advertisements

‘SMART TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT’

Although a seemingly innocent initiative, smart cameras are part of a larger agenda, one that helps fulfil the vision set out for this country and our infrastructure in the cities and regions.

Last year, the South Australian government decided to follow in the footsteps of various other states and permanently install mobile phone detection cameras (MPDC).

As part of a $15.9 million program, if you are caught by a mobile phone detection camera while driving, you will be fined $650 and lose three demerit points.

Governments and councils around the country are using AI cameras in various ways.

NSW councils use the feed from dashcams to identify road defects, and the NSW state government uses AI in Sydney’s southwest to identify koalas and alert drivers.

In Melbourne in 2022, an AI-powered traffic-management system known as the “Intelligent Corridor” was launched to cover a 2.5km stretch between Alexandra and Victoria Parades.

The ‘Intelligent Corridor’ uses sensors, cloud-based AI, machine-learning algorithms, predictive models, and real-time data capture with the goal of ‘easing congestion’, ‘improving road safety for cars and pedestrians’, and ‘reducing emissions’.

“From connected vehicles to autonomous driving to integrated mobility management, this technology is laying the groundwork for a sustainable and congestion-free future, using the very best in multi-modal demand management technologies,” said Matthew McLeish, TrafficCom Executive Vice-President.

The key word there: Integrated.

Melbourne has also rolled out AI cameras in a number of areas to ‘clamp down on drunk and drug-affected motorists’, in a move that has drawn similar criticisms.

By implementing smart city technology and successfully leveraging the vast amounts of data delivered via a myriad of sensors, a new age will begin for local authorities.

Adelaide is already a smart city, rolling out infrastructure prior to the ‘pandemic’, as we reported.

The driverless/electric vehicle push is directly linked to smart initiatives. Australia’s move towards a biometric dystopia is expanding without consultation with the public.

Big Brother is Watching, South Australia.

The video below was not easy to find as it has been deprioritised. This is why online media and platforms are losing trust from the public. They appear to be making it harder to find information in the public interest.

Mark Steel expert opinion on SMART and 5G. It is interesting to note that trees are cut down, this is because the signal can’t move through trees. Microwaves are detrimental to health. Children are at the highest risk due to body density. Radiation causes cancer. Children are on their phones and they are becoming addicted to the technology. This has massive health effects. Has the South Australian Government (and others) considered the health and safety of this technology inclusive of mental health.

Weather Modification Ban in Florida – what of Australia?

I am very happy to learn of this. Geoengineering modifies our weather and then this impacts the public in the name of ‘climate change’.

There needs to be a debate in Australia. I saw a plane spreading a long chemtrail 2 days ago in a blue cloudless sky and every time I see it I know I have to keep working for the benefit of my society. It is detrimental to humans and the environment. This spraying contains barium, strontium, aluminium and titanium, these are toxic chemicals. How it impacts nature is not studied. No-one should be modifying weather, just allow nature to find its balance as we learn to live in harmony with nature.

I don’t believe those deliberately polluting our environment should be fined, it should be jail terms as it is causing harm. The business of fines runs to the heart of why it is happening, profit. Everyone, including courts, are profiting from unlawful activity rather than creating consequences or resolution that not only bans but stops the ‘desire’ to undertake activities that cause harm in the name of profits or power.

Florida approves bill to BAN weather modification across the state

Florida has passed a new bill prohibiting geoengineering, preventing the release of apparatuses into the atmosphere intended to manipulate the weather.

The weather manipulation agenda halted in Florida.
Photo: DKH

One U.S. state takes a stand.

CHEMTRAIL BILL PASSES

A bill to ban weather modification projects has passed the Florida Senate, aimed at outlawing controversial geoengineering techniques across the state.

SB-56, dubbed the so-called “chemtrails bill”, prohibits “…the injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of a chemical, a chemical compound, a substance, or an apparatus into the atmosphere within the borders of this state for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.”

Miami Republican, Ileana Garcia, sponsored the bill.

“There is a lot of unauthorised activity that is currently not regulated both at a federal and a state level, and this is where we wanted to start,” Garcia told members of the Senate.

“This is how we are trying to create a method to the madness by creating a reporting mechanism that starts with complaints to the Department of Environmental Protection with complaints and concerns and then also at our local state airports.”

Any person or corporation who conducts such geoengineering or weather modification activity would be subject to a third-degree felony charge, with fines up to $100,000.

If an aircraft operator or controller commits the third-degree felony, they could be subject to a fine up to $5,000 and up to five years in prison.

DEP, which would be charged with investigating claims of illegally modified weather, would also be banned from conducting weather modification studies.

As would everyday Floridians, who could also face a $100,000 fine for injecting chemicals into the atmosphere, solar radiation management – deflecting solar rays to decrease the earth’s temperature – or chemtrails, vapor trailing airplanes with dangerous chemicals.

Garcia’s bill passed the Senate Floor with no debate in a 29 to 9 vote. Senators Jason Pizzo and Barbara Sharief were the only Democrats to join Republicans in approving the measure.

Following the vote, Senate President Ben Albritton praised Garcia for producing a “great piece of legislation.” “Healthy scepticism is important,” he said in a written statement.

“People have a right to know what is happening. There’s a lot we don’t know in this field of science and people are rightfully concerned.”

The bill came months after two major hurricanes rocked the Southeast in quick succession, leading some conservative personalities to blame purposeful weather control.

“Whether fact or fiction, what we want to be able to do is log, track, investigate, and mitigate,” Garcia said.

Gov. Ron DeSantis posted on social media a video announcing his support for Garcia’s bill, but slammed the House version (HB 477), sponsored by Pasco County Republican Kevin Steele, saying that it’s “gutted” Garcia’s measure.

“They would actually codify the practice of geoengineering and weather modification,” DeSantis said.

“People got a lot of kooky ideas that they can get in and put things in the atmosphere to block the sun and save us from climate change. We’re not playing that game in Florida.”

Indeed, geoengineering is a dangerous game. Kudos to the state of Florida, who were one of the only locations to push back against COVID jabs and mandates, now doing this.

Citizens will (hopefully) now be able to breath in the air and grow food without any fear of consequences of radical weather manipulation experiments around them.

What a luxury – something that can’t be said for us here home in Australia.Advertisements

GEOENGINEERING PUSH BACK

From ‘conspiracy’ to mainstream: This is the path geoengineering has taken over the last decade, as the practice starts to be exposed in greater detail.

Now that weather manipulation is an open and textbook science in 2025, so too has been the opposition that has risen against the dangerous practice.

In recent months, the ecological consequences have become too hard to ignore, forcing some companies to abandon their Artic geoengineering vision.\

Several U.S. states have already moved to ban geoengineering over their skies, including New Hampshire and Tennessee, as discussion continues to increase.

Meanwhile, in Australia, politicians continue to pretend these practices don’t exist.

A perfect example of the intentional and deceptional ignorance can be found with weather manipulation experiments happening at the Great Barrier Reef.

Known as “cloud brightening”, this technique ‘enhances the clouds’, helping them to ‘reflect solar energy away from the Reef’ in an attempt to ‘protect corals from bleaching’.

To do so, trillions of nano-sized salt crystals are shot into the air from a barge.

Meaghan Scanlon, who was the Minister for the Environment and the Great Barrier Reef at the time this was occurring, said she was “not aware” of any programs taking place.

Despite being the sole MP responsible for overseeing the area.

‘I see nothing!’

Not too long after the ‘cloud brightening’ experiment concluded off the Great Barrier Reef, UNECSO launched a second call for the region to be placed on the environmental danger list – once again highlighting how damaging this practice can be.

Let’s hope that the trend of resistance continues against geoengineering, and that this may soon reach Australia. Society needs to wake up to this unregulated and secretive practice.

But I won’t hold my breath in scattered-sky-prison-land-Australia.

Lap-dogging to the NWO agenda seems to be our mode of operation in 2025.

What are your thoughts on this news from Florida?

Be sure to leave your thoughts in the comment section below!

KEEP UP-TO-DATE

For more TOTT News:

Facebook — Facebook.com/TOTTNews

YouTube — YouTube.com/TOTTNews

Instagram — Instagram.com/TOTTNews

Twitter — Twitter.com/EthanTOTT

Bitchute — Bitchute.com/TOTTNews

Gab — Gab.com/TOTTNews

Geoengineering Ban Public Hearing, New Hampshire | Video

Weather Warfare and Carbon Black Dust

Discussion: Weather Modification History with Jim Lee | Part I

Continue Reading

Previous:AI-driven ‘smart management’ cameras coming to SA roads

1 thought on “Florida approves bill to BAN weather modification across the state

Is There a Link Between Vaccines, Disaster Capitalism, City States and the Australian Constitution and the Vote?

I was very concerned to hear Dr Nick on the Today Show promoting Flu vaccines and one of the Hosts speaking of her young children and herself sick all the time. This raised alarm bells for me and the fact that this promotion never stops to investigate the safety issues. The media keeps promoting this as safe when there are major questions around safety and evidence they are not safe.

My mother told me before she died that she had the flu shot which she didn’t want but was pressured by a doctor. She told me she started to cough and sniff. It brought on Covid symptoms.

Another friend said that the flu shot was forced as she was working with the elderly. She had to have it. She said a few years ago it was different, this time she was very sore around the injection site, and like my mother, was sniffing and coughing. I suspect it was a mRNA shot.

We are witnessing Disaster Capitalism models of business that are causing harm to the population and calling this business-as-usual without any legal ramifications or typically they get fined (slap on the wrist). They have acquired disproportionate power and control decisions of governments. This undermines the democratic process (our voice) and can work against the best interests of the public as these high level actors are in business to profit maximise not caring for a population to ensure safety. There are real concerns of depopulation plans, albeit genocide.

There needs to be a independent global inquiry into vaccines (genetic therapies) as they have been found to be unsafe. The concentration of wealth by pharmaceutical industries, donors, and the ability to influence governments is a form of ‘disaster capitalism’ which is enabled by disinformation by mainstream media which is impacting the health and safety, particularly of young children.

This video by Caroline Chang (below) in the US independent media (Awake2Oneness media) coupled with her experiences as a mother whose two children have died. Her older her daughter was vaccine damaged causing MS and died of the Covid-19 shot. It is necessary to understand the core issues that a democratic society must resolve. Vaccines even under US law are not safe.

Apologies for the advertisements which are not wanted nor relevant.

Listening to Caroline is saddening as people wake up to the collective poisoning through trace elements in our foods.

She mentions in the United States the 1986 Act – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act whereby industry lobbyists were successful in attaining ‘no fault’ legislation – “…a federal no-fault system for compensating vaccine-related injuries or death by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters …”

The cost benefit is massive as a result of exaggerated risk, lockdowns to coerce vaccinations and collapse small to medium sized businesses. It was classic standard over tactics based on flawed data as a coordinated operation. My submission to the ACT Government provides evidence:

https://www.academia.edu/71821461/14_COVID_19_Conscientious_Objection_Public_Health_Orders_and_Corruption_Report

More reports are emerging.

https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/science-history/vaccine-science/common-questions-about-vaccine-liability

Expression_of_Concern_Walach_et_al_The_Safety_of_C

Background: COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

Today I see a blue sky and one chemtrail line spreading barium, strontium and aluminium. The public think it is contrails, it is not. We are being poisoned.

Low oxygen is another problem with plankton dying in the oceans supplying 80% of our oxygen. The deaths have dropped oxygen by 50%.

World’s Biggest Oxygen Producers Living in Swirling Ocean Waters

Microplastics are responsible for the die off of plankton, this is an industry problem not a consumption issue. The onus of change has to be at the feet of industry and globalists who are acting above the law due to corruption.

Microplastics Are Silently Destroying Marine Life (Here’s What We Know)

Caroline speaks of flouride. I grew up in Canberra, it had the highest levels in the country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_in_Australia

I do not consent to collective poisoning of the public.

The Whitehorse Council here in Melbourne in 2025 was promoting and updating childhood vaccines (immunisation). This included Hepatitis B, Pneumococcal, Rotavirus, Meningococcal B, MMR, Haemophilus INfluenzae. I was informed the DTPa-PIV for 4 year olds – is Diptheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis (4 in 1). It features in the immunisation handbook. https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/contents/vaccine-preventable-diseases/diphtheria. I was alarmed particularly with Poliomyelitis and the injuries reported in India. When I inquired into this I was told that if a child doesn’t get the vaccine they can’t get into kindergarten. This is coercion and contravenes the Australian Constitution where you can’t administer medical interventions without consent, it is called medical rape. It is the same philosophy as Covid-19 when it is unlawful for anyone to coerce any medical intervention. The public are largely unaware and were caught off guard.

Constitutional Issues

This article is from Constitution Watch, entitled COVID-19 Vaccination DNA Contamination.

Posted onOctober 11, 2024AuthorEditor

Russell Broadbent MP has sent a follow up letter to the Prime Minister outlining the implications of DNA contamination found in Australian covid-19 vaccine vials. His letter is co-signed by 52 Australian and international health professionals, including eminent professors and associate professors.

In short, there is compelling evidence that excessive synthetic foreign DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles can integrate into human cells, potentially leading to genomic instability, cancers, immune system disruption, and adverse hereditary effects.

He again urged the Prime Minister to immediately suspend the rollout pending an urgent investigation – one which allows for free and open scientific discourse to help uncover the true facts.

Another important constitutional issue that impacts the health of the public is whether our country remains under crown law or moves to a Republic. In recent news (2025) the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has stated his preference for a president, this is about a republic. A Republic was rejected by Australians when Malcolm Turnbull was Prime Minister (1999).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Australian_republic_referendum

What this means is the Australian people lose Constitutional crown law which affords the only human rights protections the public have. The Bill of Rights was voted down by our politicians on 24/3/2020 just as pandemic lockdowns started. Crown or common law is essential. For example to ensures the jury system vs single judge (Star chambers), constitutional rights to government services (unconditional), Chapter III (constitutional common law court).

A republic aligns with the United States and raises further questions about whether the Australian Government is operating under Constitutional Crown law or as Corporate Governance under Washington D.C. Securities Exchange Commission. .

Prime Minister Albanese stated during the Royal Coronation he is aligned with the Crown, as follows:

https://apnews.com/article/australia-albanese-allegiance-king-charles-d12518ae992eb089fea40dfb6e25bb79

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-03/anthony-albanese-meets-with-king-charles-at-buckingham-palace/102294836

However, Anthony Albanese oath of allegiance was not correct or technically swearing him in as a Prime Minister. Was Scott Morrison the last Prime Minister? Are we moving to a future government with NO voting as President Trump stated. PM Albanese has to recite the Commonwealth of Australia Constitutional oath exactly the same as the Australian Constitution to be valid. If he doesn’t, he hasn’t been sworn in and is not the Prime Minister lawfully.

The media spun this swearing in ceremony as a secular nation, yet he states he is a Catholic (Vatican). He stood in front of Australians with a partner not a wife which contravenes his own religious beliefs. So what is true? Constitution Watch article as follows:

https://constitutionwatch.com.au/can-you-find-the-prime-minister-anthony-albanese-oath-of-allegiance-consistent-with-the-parameters-prescribed-by-the-constitution-we-cant/

It has been recently reported that King Charles has visited the Vatican.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-10/king-charles-and-queen-camilla-make-surprise-pope-francis-visit/105158900

Does this mean a transfer of power from the crown to the Vatican? Has the Australian Constitution been quietly repealed by the UK Parliament? What is the truth?

It is important to understand that the Vatican, Washington D.C. and City of London are all City States they are not part of the countries that host them. This means they are independent of the nation ie. UK and USA. There are questions around the City of Canberra, and its original latin meaning of ‘londini’ which means City of London. The City of Canberra has its own flag. I noted the Canberra Times was moved from Fyshwick, from the heart of a light industrial area with many middle sized businesses to the City of Canberra which is now dominated by multinationals. It is a distinct shift and impacts how the Capital media is reported.

So is Canberra hosting the Commonwealth of Australia (Constitutional government) or Washington D.C. S.E.C. corporate entity (Securities Exchange Commission) enabling business to business transactions outside of Constitutional law which prohibits corporations? Would this make the Commonwealth of Australia a corporation listed on a Washington D.C. S.E.C. city state, thus raising questions of is this the government? Who are the stakeholders, donors and interests? Is this government representing the Australian people or foreign interests? Is the vote legitimate?

This is an important issue as the Commonwealth of Australia and the State Governments are all listed on the Washington D.C. Securities Exchange Commission. What this means is the country has transferred from Constitutional law to a corporate entity that has stakeholders and must report the countries wealth and particulars to a private sector S.E.C. located in the United States. It means private equity investors lend to the Australian Government corporation and can have more relevance than nationals. There are no common law rights under this framework and it means that people become excluded if they don’t consent.

The links below reveal the Commonwealth of Australia listing on the Washington D.C. S.E.C.

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000805157&owner=include&count=40

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/805157/000134100410001939/coa_18ka.htm

Is this why the vaccine issue never goes away and no real legal action is taken given the public have been injured and killed from Vaccinations. What rights do we really have to ensure our own safety?

‘Wag the Dog’ is Scripted Politics Selling Group Think to Achieve Objectives

In the public interest.

The narrative that repeats infinitem is manipulating mass audiences to think as they choose rather than a real democratic model which reflects the people not power interests. We have never had a real representative government. In the future we will choose in ways that serve all people and the planet.

Wag the Dog trailers

Is this what happened in Ukraine where the war was created and the tragedy of the public targeted with impunity. What was the outcome? A request for rare metals. Was that the objective? Are we looking at disaster capitalism coordinated by all sides?

Making Wag the Dog

For The World