Category Archives: Deception

A Message for the World: The Deep State and George Floyd

I had inspiration around George Floyd, I haven’t seen any knews about this issue as I don’t have a TV.  I saw in my mind’s eye the black guy kneeling down on bended knee. I felt this was deliberate to divide the country.  Colin Kaepernick: Nike makes NFL ‘taking a knee’.  Black ops manipulate in the background as they know what sparks anger and injustice.  The words he is speaking I feel intuitively.  He speaks about redirecting the anger towards those behind the anger.  He is a truth teller.  He will be watched for sure.

The African American’s must be very careful that they are not used to further the agenda of those who want to usher in control.  The fact that President Trump is associated with White Supremacist’s is his weakness and immaturity, yet at the same time he is fighting the Deep State/Shadow Government. This is the real war.  The internet can easily be used to inflame hatred. Whenever I see hate arising I know it is divide and rule.

So be mindful. I am a peacemaker and my work is to remind people we are One, that inequality is a lie and that it is time to remember who we really are.  Everyone has infinite potential, colour is just lanolin or less lanolin.  Yes we have differences but we are more similar than different. So just know racism can be fueled.  Justice, as in the rebalancing of the scales will happen, as the pendulum is swinging back as truth arises.

I felt intuitively this person has a message for the World.  I’ve just found him quite quickly. Black Lives Matter is the feeling. I felt a Judge who mentioned this issue and #Metoo when I found myself in a biased hearing. He helped awaken me.

This is the video (below) that led me to the one above.  I do smile at his lingo.  He is no holds barred.  He has a very different narrative, very passionate and is angry.  Look past his emotions and listen deeply as his anger is a call for help.  He speaks about the targeting of civilians.  He speaks about anarchy and the implementation of Marshall law.  He has made claims that are shocking.  If what he is saying is true, then people have to wake up.  I haven’t watched the whole video so I can’t validate it.  However, my inner-sense can feel his inner truth seeking expression in a African American narrative which is emotional and blunt. He is hard to hear as he is angry, but I am persevering to look at the information he has researched. Some very interesting ideas.  If you go to 1.01.17 on the video he speaks of the Sydney Morning Herald here in Australia. I laugh at his language, he is funny in the way he speaks.  He is saying it is not white Supremacist it is freemasons.  He identifies agent provocateurs, paid protestors, George Soros is mentioned, 1.18.30.  The issue is money being used in service of those who seek to control. He mentions order out of chaos as a Illuminati symbol.  This appears to be where legitimate police need to look, is my feeling. He sees a chess game.  I do laugh listening to his full on language. Wow.  He brings up sexual harassment and he tells his people and sees it as disrespect and he alludes to young girls, he is opposed to this.  He is seeking to awaken the corruption. He is raising issues of abuse in the African American community.  I’ve moved to 2.03.06 and he raises an issue of a city scape showing fires and makes it clear that it is an image used in a movie. The point is deliberate misinformation. He is showing incitement. The police do need to look at this (just bare with the narrative, it is his style, beneath it he is revealing research). Perhaps this is why they focused on misinformation as they were doing it. Deception is interesting as it often will raise issues about a problem but at the same time be doing it. Directing attention.  It is psychological operation.  What I find interesting about this commentator is he is fearless in his exposure of crimes.  Yet he will be ridiculed as he could be seen as extreme. Only if you are able to look beyond personalities and sift for what is true what is not can you awaken.   He speaks of Anthony Weiner’s laptop and files pertaining to Hillary Clinton and espionage.  This is a major issue.

Anthony Weiner Laptop:…/

JustInformed Talk (Twitter)

He speaks of lawyer Sidney Powell exposing the Weiner laptop contents(HRC/HUMA VID?) that made NYPD officers throw up after seeing.
He has indicated that Barrack Obama’s birth certificate is fake.  That is worth following up on.  I just saw Obama’s comments regarding George Floyd. This could be incitement. I smile these days remember he said Gandhi was his favourite person, today I know that was just marketing to try and associate with those who truly served the people.  He makes some incredible allegations at 2.24 indicating pedophilia and Barrack Obama.
It appears from this narrative that there are people seeking to fight against the Deep state who are creating another civil war.

He mentioned Bill Gates and Fauci chipping people for tracking and food.
He is funny talking about his nobel peace prize when it is all over.  He is a survivor, I am sure he is. He is giving me a laugh.  Unification is about bringing the people together, that is the light or enlightenment.
This reveals the war against the people and ushering new governance that is totalitarian.  It is interesting when I was in Bangkok as  peace fellow we spoke of a massacre’s in the South of Thailand between military and protestors (muslim).  I asked after a series of questions – who is the enemy… I then concluded with are the people the enemy. This stuck with me.  I found that US Military were on my website that night.  It was the beginning of my own awakening. So as I sift through this video I am focusing on truth and I am sensing resonance.  Truth can seem like conspiracy but I’ve done enough research to recognize we are witnessing a takeover.

National Defense Authorization Act

Ex CIA Exposes the Criminal Cartel in Washington D.C. as the Biggest Scandal in US History

In the public interest. Do you see our world as out of control? This video below will explain why.

Kevin Shipp, a former CIA officer discusses the Shadow Government and the Deep State. He outlines Hillary Clinton’s illegal activities calling Criminal Cabal. He indicates this is the biggest scandal in US history.

The key issue raised is accountability. He is astounded that given clear felony’s by senior figures in Washington D.C., nothing happens.

This was a question I had. I couldn’t understand if there is criminal activity why is there no criminal case and jail terms? Kevin Shipp explains the protection of corruption in Washington. It is well organised.

An Australian is mentioned, former Minister for Foreign Affairs, Alexander Downer was mentioned as involved. Kevin Shipp states:

Alexander Downer, Australian Ambassador to the US gave $24 million tax dollars to Clinton foundation. Australian people do not know. He pops up in a bar approaching George George Papadopoulos to get him to admit the Trump campaign had Hillary Clinton’s emails…

This video presentation is very alarming given the power of US politics and implications for World Peace if out of control with no checks and balances. Their influence on other countries, including Australia, impacts political decisions, budget’s, military spending, welfare, trade deals and other illegal activities. It sets a standard for covering up illegal activity and the use of secrecy clearances to block government oversight on their activities. It is a complex and informative discussion.

He speaks about the critical importance of President Donald Trump’s Presidency cannot be underestimated in blocking the domination agenda called the New International World Order (New World Order). He is an outsider, he uses his own money and he is attempting to expose their activities and is under attack himself to remove him before the next election. Donald Trump uses the term ‘draining the swamp’ which describes a long term pattern of corruption in the Whitehouse, Federal Government and intelligence community.

The mindsets are anti-democratic, unconstitutional, illegal and engaging in activities that are hidden from the public. Kevin Shipp is bringing this out in the open so the public are informed about what is being done in their name. He holds grave concerns about US Democracy and criminality at the highest levels.

MP Andrew Wilkie Explains the Illegal Extradition of Julian Assange

In the public interest.

Thank goodness we have one politician who speaks truth to power. Andrew Wilkie MP is a former Office of National Assessment analyst (intelligence). He also was a whistleblower in respect of the illegal war in Iraq.

It is important that truth comes out. Silence and apathy is what allows injustice to occur.

Senate Hearing: Defence Response to US Torture and Leadership?

I am definitely having inspiration tonight and my finding of the Senate hearings, Senator Ludlam appears to be the focus as the hearings come up with him, which I sense is significant. It was unexpected but intriguing as I explore democracy, Senators, government officials and whether the public interest is served.

I note the questions around Trump going to war with China. Definitely there was posturing prior to Trump and prior to Iraq around tensions building as China is perceived as a threat. So in this dance between Senator Ludlam and the Secretary of Defence the narrative maintains official lines of ‘not going to war with China’ but nonetheless the tensions could escalate as defence is not the issue but pre-emptive tactical approaches which may not be first strike but could build the context for conflict.

The Trump administration has not said it is going to war but the machinations are warlike and it is clear there is conflict over trade and power.

Secretary of Defence Richardson was asked his view on torture. The secretary emphatically states he is keeping his views to himself, yet I believe that is in the public interest given waterboarding, as we are aligned with the United States.

Senator Ludlam then switches tact and asks a policy question.
What is Australian policy on torture?

The Secretary of Defence says: we don’t utilise torture.

Senator Ludlam: Do we support our allies using it?
The Secretary of Defence indicates: as a general principle we are opposed to the use of torture. Senator asks ‘is this view communicated to colleagues at a ministerial or departmental level or counterparts in the US. Secretary says ‘to whom’ and then asks ‘why’?

My thought here: The words ‘as a general principle we are opposed’. So specifically we are not?? Torturing people should be clearly a ‘no’ given the Geneva Conventions and signatories to the Conventions on Torture. So illegality is the subtle issue here.

Senator Ludlam indicates: the reintroduction of torture as a means of intelligence gathering. He says the US Commander-in-Chief indicated things way worse than waterboarding.

Minister Payne indicates the views of the Secretary of Defence are taken on board. No comment on torture.

Secretary of Defence stated: the President spoke positively about waterboarding, as President he indicated personally he didn’t have a problem with waterboarding however he delegated it to the Secretary of Defence, highly decorated officer who was opposed to and not pursue such methods. He thinks Trump is clear.

Senator says it is contradictory.

I will add in here: How can our Secretary of Defence speak to a President’s positive attitude about waterboarding when this is an activity of making a person believe they are drowning. Taking them to the point of death struggling for air. It is horrendous and if he were to experience it I am sure he would condemn such a practice. These are invisible lines drawn as to who we are as humans. Yet the reality is the military is in the business of killing. This acceptance of violence as a solution is hard to fathom and unquestioned mindsets believe violence works as we have seen over and over the harm caused and hatred fuelled by violent actions. This does not make the world a safer place. It makes it very frightening particularly when these attitudes (projections) can come into the Australian society under the guise of homeland security (ASIO Act) given protests and automation/AI disruptions in the future. What then? Do we change humanitarian laws around targetting? Do we replace democracy with a technocracy? Do we drop all rules of war as the posts have shifted and we just move with the times without an anchor or handle on who we are as Australians and what we believe in.

The issue here is standards and ethics and the illegality of torture of which Australia is a signatory and whether as an ally we have sought to make clear we are not aligned there. It appears we ignore it. The answers are vague as it is evident they preserve the relationship. However, as a friend and ally we are in truth obligated to speak the truth to allies if we are steadfast in our sovereignty and values to uphold democracy if that is the objective. The latter is a key question.

Senator Ludlam asks: Will Australia continue to use intelligence from the 5 Eyes agreement if that intelligence was obtained through torture?

Another key area of focus is Pine Gap located in Australia and as part of the 5 Eyes and information about Australians passed by US to Australian counterparts to gather data and create ‘plausible deniability’ from our end.

Secretary of Defence: We don’t know how the intelligence is obtained. We intelligence share with Australia (doesn’t sound right), it saves Australian lives and we value the intelligence the US shares with us.

My question – does it on balance?

Senator asks: Do we do any due diligence? (to find out how it is gathered)

No, the Secretary states.

Senator: So we don’t mind if obtained by torture.

Secretary of Defence: We share intelligence. We have long standing arrangements. National interest is served, Australian lives saved (said again).

Senator Ludlam asks: Are national interests served if implicated by torture as intelligence gathering technique?

Thus the Secretary of Defence ignores the ethics (as he is trained to do) and indicates the relationship is served by intelligence sharing arrangements. So this highlights for me – why we are in relationship with the United States as data gathering is to gain advantage in a competitive world driven by economic interests where real time information is power.

I wish to sit with this for a moment as I can feel inspiration. I wish to say that I observe justification for activities refers to the public benefit yet under the surface there is denial in facing torture that is illegal. We look at self interest but not collective values as democratic which is often a justification for military activities. The issue of complicitness arises as we know, even publicly, that torture is used. This is associated with dictatorships and totalitarian regimes as our societies speak of the rule of law, justice etc. Ethics and warfare are fraught with contradictions as war is about killing and winning. We dress it up as noble yet training is violent and it preserves power in truth.

Senator Ludlam asks: Does the Australian Government support the US in its alleged proposal to bring back the use of black sites, where torture carried out in the past operated by CIA?

Secretary of Defence: As far as I am aware (slip up here). I am simply not aware that this is the intention of the US administration.

Senator: New York Times obtained draft Executive Order, will table it. Refer:

Secretary of Defence: I will simply note Senator administration has denied, whether it was right or not, I don’t know, that there was such as draft administrative order. You are going to present an article from the New York Times, which the administration has denied. So nothing I can do with the article you give to me.

Senator: Won’t bother than.

Further discussion about Tillerson.

I like this question:

Senator Ludlam: Are you guys having trouble establishing what US Government policy is?

No. None whatsoever…

Senator states: President Trump says United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its sense about nukes…(before he takes office) let it be an arms race. Does the Department or Minster agree with this strategy to make the world a safer place?

Minister Payne felt his question wasn’t constructive.

I would like to add in my feeling here. I note that the way she answered the question was controlling the QandA and deciding if she would answer or not rather than being subject to a people’s representative asking questions on behalf of the Australian people. Under the surface Senator Ludlam revealed a vulnerability in respect to the character of Trump which is critical given his finger is on the nuclear button.

As citizens we would want that question answered as nuclear misadventure is in our interests as populations would be destroyed if a mentally unwell or dominating (dictatorial) person ordered a detonation. Whilst these weapons are in the world we have a right to know what our Defence department’s position is. Yes I understand there is diplomatic issues but what of fearlessly speaking out as Australian’s and calling a spade a spade as a good friend and ally must to ensure peace in our world? It is a question of grave importance as the words ‘arms race’ cost Australian taxpayers as we pay the price for this alliance that aligns us against others rather than taking the position of a mediator (in my view a wiser posture). The arms race may convey to the industrial military complex that there will be future sales.

It is noteworthy that Minister Payne oversighted a $200 billion dollar defence expenditure and it has been recently stated by a US Admiral Davidson (Lowly Institute, 2020) that Australia’s trade is approximately $400 billion (Australian) in the defence relationship which is a lot of money. Considering our welfare sector is being cut, more people are unemployed and rising numbers of homeless budget priorities must be determined and justified on real grounds that benefit all Australians.

Moreover, US defence paper’s released to the public have a strategy of Full Spectrum Dominance (2018) which is about total control across battlefield strategic areas including cyber warfare. Scrutiny of the US is essential give Silicon Valley companies contracted in the Australian government to manage software, information and notably defence etc. So their nuclear position, attitudes, beliefs and continued funding of these zero sum weapons is in the public interest.

We still align with violence in the mistaken belief this makes us safer. It does not. It redirects precious resources into violent conflict that is increasingly outside of public oversight given lucrative privatisation of the military and intelligence operatives (militias, contractors). As corporations and foreign governments dominate government (purchase representatives) and in cases have their own Minister’s e.g. Defence Industries, they have access to a political process when in reality we (the public) don’t. I have tried myself to write to Minister’s and leaders and it is evident they are not responding to me or answering my questions etc. Our democracy is shaky at best. We are forced to pay tax and we have no say over where it goes just assured it “saves lives” and is in our interests when soldiers were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq or exposed to depleted uranium. Large numbers of civilians are killed, so lives are not saved in wars for oil or power struggles. The political jostling for control on behalf of interests is of great concern. So the area of Defence relationships and interests requires an inquiry (without vested interests) to cost/benefit and ethical appraise this relationship given the growing instability of leadership, clear undermining of democracy, foreign interference, the unaccountable Deep State (shadow government) and black operations which is unaccountable to the public.

We hitch our wagon in the vague belief we are protected or get surveillance/information benefits when civilians are clearly not protected as weapons blow up entire buildings, release radiation, destroy infrastructure and ignore the Geneva Conventions. So there is a care factor of zero for the public. A rules based order or the rule of law goes out the window as Guantanamo Bay clearly has shown. It appears that thuggery has replaced real defence and the character of leaders is of greatest concern. This is not just Donald Trump but the Clinton, Bush and Obama camps as well.

So what can civilians do? How do we get real answers to questions that must be answered without notice? Are we sovereign or serving two?