Category Archives: Justice

Hillsong Church, Boys Town and the Conspiracy of Silence

This blog covers issues about pedophilia in respect of Hillsong Church, Boys Town and the Conspiracy of Silence due to those in power being part of pedophile rings  It is absolutely unacceptable for child abuse to be covered up and ignored.  Imagine if you were that child.  To force sex on an innocent child reveals this emotional disconnect from the suffering of the ‘other’ and drives to the heart of how and why abuse happens.  It is a sickness not an ‘orientation’ as has been stated, thus objectifies the suffering of children and projects fantasy’s onto them. These children may become so traumatised that the mind disassociates from the experience which is why later in life they get flash backs.  The mind does this as a survival mechanism as the trauma was too great.

I will look into some of the links that indicate that there are some commentators attempting to normalise pedophilia.  This is very concerning. Yet it is what those who abuse do as they are in denial of the gravity of the crime. Some call it ‘boy love’, it is the extreme opposite of love.

What prompted me to produce this blog was a news feed from the ABC entitled ‘Scott Morrison dismisses report he wanted Hillsong pastor Brian Houston to attend events during US state visit’.   I suddenly had inspiration to look at Hillsong and pedophilia. 

This is the ABC article refer

I recall Fiona Barnett, a child ritual abuse victim from Victoria, Australia bravely making public a VIP pedophile ring.  She remembered those involved in ritual child abuse as she was flown around the world as a child given to men to abuse. I am extremely concerned about this issue.  If it is true then there must be an investigation into high level pedophilia. This is a serious crime and no-one is above the law.
Fiona’s website is:

I have found another story on the Exclusive Brethren, Pedophilia and links to conservative politics.  I note that John Howard has links to them given they approached him to give donations.

For some reason my blog page is not allowing me to post the link, I’ve just gone to an another private browser that blocks data gathering and I’ve been able to paste a link.  Take note of that if you have difficulties when blogging.

This is the article.  Brethren bid to cover up sexual assaults on girls

The public demand to know if there are pedophiles in high profile positions still at large. These matters must be investigated in the public interest.

The first video is from 60 Minutes Australia exposing Frank Houston the founder of the Hillsong Church.   The second video is explosive called ‘Conspiracy of Silence’. It exposes pedophilia in Boys Town and speaks about pedophilia at the highest levels. I will feature the article in the next blog.

60 minutes YouTube video highlights pedophilia in the church.

Whistle-Blower McBride States Government Acting as a Totalitarian

In the public interest, courtesy of the Guardian.

I don’t think the government is acting. The suppression of the truth is perverting the course of justice, in my view.

A notable extract from below:

Boyle, the ATO whistleblower, similarly made an internal disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure (PID) Act to the ATO. His complaint was investigated and dismissed, according to the ABC and the Nine Entertainment newspapers. Boyle then went public.

There are attempts to have people complain internally to ensure no public scrutiny, but if they are not able to act neutrally or seek to protect themselves then inevitably if the problem is not resolved, it escalates.  The lack of values is a core issue.  It is all very well to have mission statements and assert publicly the organisation has values but not act on it due to interference or fear. 

The issue in my own experience is reporting suspected corruption to regulators to be told the complaint is dismissed or not even investigated when evidence is available.  I perceive this practice is widespread and deeply problematic. There are other questions around underfunding regulators so that complaints are delayed.

Whistleblower protections ‘a sham’, says lawyer whose leaks led to ABC raids

 This article is more than 3 months old

David McBride, who leaked information on special forces, says government is acting like a ‘totalitarian regime’

Leaks from whistleblower David McBride prompted this week’s raids on the ABC
 Leaks from whistleblower David McBride prompted this week’s raids on the ABC Photograph: Alexandra Back/Fairfax Media

The military lawyer whose leaks prompted this week’s police raids on the ABC has criticised Australia’s whistleblower protections as a “sham”, saying the government is acting like a “totalitarian regime” to shield itself from criticism.

David McBride is facing lengthy jail time for providing documents to the public broadcaster on the conduct of special forces in Afghanistan, which prompted the Wednesday raids.

McBride is far from alone in his plight. Witness K and Bernard Collaery, who revealed Australia’s unlawful 2004 spy operation against Timor-Leste, are facing two years behind bars for their actions, and the Australian Taxation Office whistleblower, Richard Boyle, is facing a lengthy jail sentence for exposing aggressive debt collection tactics that were destroying the lives of vulnerable taxpayers.

In all three cases, the whistleblowers went through the appropriate steps to raise their concerns internally within government, before frustration at inaction led them into going public. They believed doing so would help afford them protections under Australia’s whistleblower regime.

“I made an internal complaint, I even went to the police first, I invoked whistleblower protections,” McBride told Guardian Australia.

“It’s all a sham.”

McBride said the inaction on his complaints led him to the ABC.

The lawyer says he was simply acting on his duty to report illegal conduct, and only wanted to protect Australia’s interest.

“I think it says everything about the problem today that if you describe my situation without saying my nationality, you would think we were talking about China or Russia,” McBride said.

“The idea that someone who basically suggested something was going wrong from within an organisation … is put in jail forever as a spy, that’s what totalitarian regimes do.

“There’s no suggestion that I’m actually damaging national security. I think the government is damaging national security, and yet they’re treating me as if I’m a terrorist.”

McBride’s comments again raise concerns about the ability of whistleblower protections to help those wanting to expose government wrongdoing.

In the case of Witness K and Collaery, the pair aired their concerns internally as required.

Witness K sought and obtained permission to talk to his lawyer, Collaery, about an illegal spy operation bugging Timor-Leste’s government during sensitive oil negotiations, raising his concerns through the inspector-general of intelligence and security.

Frustrated by the inaction, they contacted a series of journalists. Both are now facing two years behind bars for doing so.

Boyle, the ATO whistleblower, similarly made an internal disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure (PID) Act to the ATO. His complaint was investigated and dismissed, according to the ABC and the Nine Entertainment newspapers. Boyle then went public.

“It says the government of Australia actually only cares about the government of Australia, and doesn’t actually care about Australia anymore,” McBride said.

“So if you speak out against the government, you’re a really bad person, even if you’re sticking up for the nation.”

“They’ve forgotten that they’re actually meant to work for the people of Australia.”

CIA Accused of Heroin Trade and Lockerbie Bombing

This appears to be testimony.

Question: If the Libyans were not responsible for Lockerbie do you have any idea who was?

Responder: Susan Lindauer  (summarised)

Susan Lindauer a former CIA asset indicates that the person who bombed Pan Am 103 lived in Virginia.  She states 6 miles from her house.  She said he is protected by the FBI and CIA and on a client basis paid a stipend.  It is to protect the CIA of its exposure of the heroin trafficking ring which continued through the 1990s.  She states Richard Fuse (1994) told her about it.  She thought the heroin trafficking stopped after Lockerbie she was told THEY are still profiting from this.

What was the motivation and why Pan Am 103 chosen.  She states the Defence Intelligence Agency filed a complaint in Washington and a internal affairs team sent out from the CIA encompassing the FBI and DIA, and gone in to Lebanon gathering forensic evidence to prove the CIA’s role in heroin trafficking and they boarded Pan Am 103 that morning, they were flying back to Washington to deliver their report with heroin, finance, cash and banking records etc and were going to expose the whole lot and that is when the plane was bombed.

The State Department put out a travel advisory to the embassies telling them to get off that plane. That plane on that date was expected to be targetted in a terrorist attack.  Embassy staff in South Africa, President Botha got off the plane, other diplomats did and they freed up seats for young students flying from Syracuse University to board the plane, they were flying standby to go home for Christmas holidays, they all died in the attack.  It is ugly. The Government is protecting itself, allowing the terrorist attack to occur, in fact they facilitated it, they made sure Islamic Jihad knew which flight the investigative team were taking back and said hey why don’t you take care of this for us.

I am adding the comments below the video as I think they are noteworthy. The last comment is of particular interest, mental issues are often used in respect of whistleblowers.

I consider her a credible witness as her allegations are dangerous for her and her family.  Moreover, she is clearly coherent.  What is hard to understand is the departments of the US Government FBI, DIA gathering evidence against the CIA.  They are clearly disparate.

These types of high level allegations should be presented before an International Criminal Court (neutral) to resolve the truth of the allegations.  Often whistle-blowers end up using the media because they are stonewalled by the Government and regulators given alleged criminality or fear of disclosures.  When they are accusing those at the highest levels the key issue is where do they go to take the case further in order to allow evidence and justice to be the final arbiter.

It is often stated no-one is above the law, yet we find many are able to avoid confronting criminal allegations.  The Judiciary is above the law in that they are immune from prosecution as I was informed by the Australian Human Rights Commission.  I believe all must be accountable and the public have to be assured that a court is impartial and not interfered with for political or religious purposes.  Issues concerning the privatisation of courts under debt/equity financing arrangements (not government funding) mean that the public can’t be sure about neutrality. The infiltration of powerful interests, ideologies and corporate interests in politics coupled with powerful financiers, can confuse the public about what is true or what is spin.  Vested interests do not work in the public interest, this is a key problem. That is why it is very important that Government accountable and transparent and able to legitimately stand before the public as a neutral party representing their interests to ensure faith in legitimate laws and that Justice is actually done (not seen to be done).

This short video raises the frightening issue of the CIA involved with organising terrorism in the case of the Pan Am flight that was bombed over Lockerbie in Scotland. The bombing was blamed on two Libyan nationals in November 1991. A Libyan intelligence officer was jailed for life.  Wikipedia outlines the case.

Susan Lindauer indicates that in order to prevent truth of a FBI/DIA investigation which would expose the CIA’s involvement in the heroin trade.  This information raises awareness that terrorism is the creation of intelligence on the behest of Government.  This must be placed in the forum of the International Criminal Court but as a neutral forum.  It cannot be interfered with by other interests. 


Here are a few comments…

Susan Its Steve Australia… You could quite Imagine my need for a good alibi” … and you’d perfect” what feisty personality…
WHY is she GRINNING so smugly, at such a HUMAN DISASTER?!
Susan Lindauer: This wacko is living her own imagination and has no credibility. She was a journalist who subsequently worked as a congressional staffer for several representatives and senators.  She became friends with a senior congressional staffer (“Richard”) and fantasized that he was a CIA officer. Both were anti-war activists.  Of her own initiative she went to NYC contacting the Iraq delegation and represented herself as a government official. The Iraq delegation quickly realized she was unstable but had value as an informant.  She later traveled to Iraq, where she may have received $10k.  After returning to the US she was arrested as a unregistered agent of a foreign power (Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) passed in 1938) which is not the Patriot Act.  During her time incarcerated she received a psychological evaluation and found unfit to stand trial.  Her charges were later dropped because she was unfit to stand trial and since she was not a danger to herself or others the federal government didn’t pursue the offense further.