Rowan Atkinson Intolerant of Intolerance or Freedom as Speech?

In the public interest.

I have been inspired overnight to return to this blog and make it clear that I do not support offence given to people, it is not about being taken it is the act of projecting verbal violence onto others to disempower their sense of value.  Moreover, the abuse, humilitation, offence and insult is about the sender of the message. They are dehumanising. When legislation removes words it is giving tacit consent to abuse. This is not respect. Whilst I could see Rowan Atkinson’s point yesterday in freedom of speech. Whilst I have confronted abuse, offence and insult in my own life, it did bring me great pain and those words can be like knives. In fact a life can be changed on the basis of a word.  However, on the other side the test with abusive people is to know they are in pain and it is never about you.  So we do need to create a shield of awareness that their insults are their own pain and refusal to face their violence. They form groups or glee clubs in order to get support to make their abuse right.  So legislation can be used as a glee club to validate that abusing people is just mild criticism or toughen up. This is denial. My response to Rowan was around freedom of speech and more dialogue to solve the problem not hate the person.  I really felt this come up overnight to make clear this blog does’t support abuse as it is seen as wounds crying out for healing believing the other is the problem when the issue is not resolved.  Just note our greatest critics are often the very teachers that lead us to deepening what we believe in or speaking our truth. Of course that is not their intention but the adversarial conflict causes a deeper desire for peace in the end.

THIS IS WHAT I WROTE YESTERDAY.

My heart and soul tells me I was born free without government permission. I felt inspired to speak as it is healthy for me. I feel inspired to laugh as that is my nature.  Yet we are in times where there are those who see openness as a threat, freedom of speech as dissent and making personal choices to say no as endangering others.  We see this particularly in Melbourne right now as justified to get those numbers down.  Yet the alternative views are being shutdown or called “conspiracy theories” when they are not.  There are intelligent discourses that need to be heard but the mainstream media (commercially owned) is ignoring the public voice.  I am for hearing the views of my society.

The constant media narrative is brainwashing people it is not informing them. The public will speak up as it gets more tough. When they start to realise things are not what they seem.

Power asserts itself not in the spirit of justice but to create fear and has a chilling effect on free expression and protest.  People are criminalised for speaking truth to power.

Protest is healthy as we are not heard.  People step up together as separately they are ignored. Yet when it impacts people’s lives they have no choice but to protect their families and neighbours against toxic cultures of control.

What I like about Rowan Atkinson’s speech is allowing insult. As a peace educator why would I say allow it.  It is a teacher. I’ve had ridicule, insult and it led me to peace.  I remember hearing people fighting and I sat there thinking why can’t we resolve conflict peacefully? So the fight raised for me the desire for peaceful dialogue and respect. I’ve seen rudeness so many times but I never desire to mirror it, it is not my nature.  Obviously I do not want to see a society that is obnoxious, disrespectful and insulting but I do see bases for resolving conflict in teaching about nonviolent narratives, learning how to say the truth of what you mean. I’ve been called an idiot, a placard waving hippy but my response would be why do you feel threatened? Why do you put me down and disrespect alternative ways? Is it accurate what you said about me or am I more than a throw away line.  Rowan is really speaking about the deception in fake narratives as facades to decency and intolerance towards those who may be angry. Yes they may say unkind words but really society looks more disapprovingly at them. Perhaps this is an opportunity to learn how to really say what we feel moving past hate, blaming and hurt.  Owning how I am feeling but not directing hate at them.  I recognise people will. In Melbourne and around Australia division is there supporting the Government narrative of lockdown to fight an infection that has to be done and those who believe COVID is a bioweapon that is collapsing the economy to bring in a new world order.  How do we allow both views to coexist?  Perhaps we look for where we agree as values can be mirrored in opposing discourse.  So people need to express how they feel, they shouldn’t be criminalised. A person shouldn’t be arrested for not wearing a mask and then insulting the police as they feel attacked by armed men. There has to be a space of understanding their are two sides. This is where conflict resolution takes you. I’ve met uneducated drug affected people who are dismissive, who steal and yet underneath all of that I discover low self esteem and self loathing projecting as hate towards others.  So when we go deeper the hate is masking great pain, suppression won’t solve it only understanding that all anger is a call for help. That is how conflict resolution  reframes situations.  I look for common ground. I see teachers helping me learn things. Even if I have suffered greatly I am not tempted to harm them, I will always speak what is truthful for me. As that is my birthright.

Rowan Atkinson speaks of free speech and the allowance of insult.

He says: the second most precious thing in life is to express your self. The first is food in your mouth and the third is a roof over your head.  (I vote for him as a person who has experienced homelessness).  Rowan speaks of enjoying free expression all his life.

He states: laws exist to contain free expression.  He believes he is highly unlikely to be arrested because of the privilege position afforded to those of a high public profile. His concerns are less for himself but for those more vulnerable because of their lower profile (that would include me).

  • Man arrested for calling a horse gay.
  • A teenager arrested who called the Church Scientology a cult
  • Café owner displaying passages from the bible on a TV screen.

Ludacrous. He speaks of Not the 9 O’clock News.  A racist police officer who I am dressing down for arresting a black man for walking on the cracks in the pavement, walking in a loud shirt in a built up area during hours of darkness, favourite – walking around all over the place.  Urinating in a public convenience and looking at me in a funny way.  Life is imitating art.

Cases were dropped, refused to pay fine, cases dropped due to publicity not justice.  The police sensed ridicule around the corner, withdrew actions. What about thousands of other cases that didn’t get publicity, not ludicrous enough to attract media attention.

The law was not working properly, it was intimidating.  It has a chilling effect on free expression and free protest.

Parliaments Joint Committee on Human Rights summarised the issue very well, stating “…while arresting a protestor using threatening speech or abusive speech may depending on the circumstances be a proportionate response we do not think language or behaviour that is merely insulting should be criminalised in this way.” 

The clear problem with the outlawing of insult is that too many things can be interpreted as such.  Criticism is construed as  insult, construed as ridicule, construed as sarcasm stating an alternative view to the orthodoxy can be interpreted as insult. so many things can be interpreted as insult.

Although the law under discussion on the statute book over 25 years it is indicative of a culture that has taken hold of the programs of successive governments that with the reasonable and well intentioned ambition to contain obnoxious elements in society has created a society of extraordinary authoritarian and controlling nature. You might call the new intolerance, a new but intense desire to gag uncomfortable voices of dissent.

I am not intolerant say many people, so many softly spoken, highly educated, liberal minded people. I am only intolerant of intolerance. And people nod sagely and say wise words wise words. If you think about this supposedly inarguable statement for longer than 5 seconds you realise that all it is advocating is the replacement of one form of intolerance with another. To me doesn’t represent any kind of progress at all. Underlying prejudices, resentments or injustice are not addressed by arresting people. They are addressed by the issues being aired, argued and dealt with preferably outside of the legal process.

The best way to increase societies resistance to insulting or offensive speech is to allow a lot more of it.  As with childhood diseases better resist those germs to which you have been exposed. We need to build our immunity in taking offence so we can deal with the issues that perfectly justified criticism can raise. Our priority should be to deal with the message not the messenger…

As President Obama said in an address “laudable efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics or oppress minorities, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech.”

That is the essence of my thesis, more speech, he says. If we want a robust society we want more robust dialogue that must include the right to insult or to offend.

Even if the freedom to be inoffensive is no freedom at all.

The repel of this word in this clause (anti-Discrimination legislation) is only a small step but will be critical one in a longer term project, to pause and rewind the creeping culture of censorious, it is a small skirmish in the battle to deal with, with what Sir Salman Rushdie refers to as the outrage industry. self appointed arbiters of the public good encouraging media stoking outrage to which the police feel under terrible pressure to react. A newspaper rings up Scotland Yard someone has said something slightly insulting on twitter about someone we think is a national treasure what are you going to do about it. The police panic, scrabble around then grasp the most inappropriate  life line Section 5 Public Order Act that thing where you can arrest anyone for saying anything that might be construed by anyone else as insulting. They don’t seem to need a real victim they only need make the judgement that someone COULD HAVE BE OFFENDED if they had heard or read what had been said. The most ludicrous degree of latitude. The storms around Facebook and Twitter comment have raised fascinating issues around free speech we haven’t come to terms with. Firstly we have to take responsibility for what we say, secondly we have learned how appalling prickly and intolerant society has become by even the mildest adverse comment. The law should not be aiding and abetting this new intolerance, free speech can only suffer if the law prevents us from dealing with its consequence.

I offer my wholehearted Support for the Reform Section 5 Campaign.

See http://reformsection5.org.uk/

Homelessness is an Outcome of Inequality

Why are people homeless? Because they have been failed. 

I am contemplating the homeless in Melbourne who are trapped and contemplating suicide. The fear around COVID means less help.

We don’t know how to love each other and are not caring what happens. We do not want regimes that just relegate people to compliance or non compliance, we need to understand the unravelling social fabric that is the catalyst for family breakdown, psychological detachment and violence that is a a call for help.

We must move forward in ways that heal the hurt and co-create homes that are ecovillages where all our needs are met not just a roof.

The kids are not tough they are mirroring what they were taught by parents who walled them out. They learned to wall out love and live in survival mode where they believe no one gives a shit.

The drug trade has been fueled by wars and criminals cartels that were endorsed at the highest levels.  The young people pay the price as they need drugs to feel good. For them the addiction (like fear) dominates their choices.  They are not in their right mind as they are not in balance.  They have not been taught how to find that warmth and fulfilment inside as nothing is permanent, all is change and they are feeling worthless.

there are no useless eaters, there are only problems that have been neglected as those at the top value business not social evolution.  They do not value those in poverty as economically viable as worth is personal net worth it is not the intrinsic worth of the human condition reflecting structural violence of a system that does not know how to nurture love. This is the outcome of valuing power over people.

How many Einstein’s or Mary Curie’s are in the group of homeless who have never had a chance to find what they love.

Nazi Leaders on Trial – Nuremberg 1945, 1984 or 2020’s?

It will take time for cases to be accumulated across the world. I feel definite inspiration that war crimes tribunals and crimes against humanity will be a reality in the future.

I travelled to Nuremberg and Berlin and I looked at the damage to an old church of the pock marks as evidence of machine gun fire. In Nuremberg I ponded deeply the war crimes tribunals. 

I went to Churchill’s war rooms.

I also went to Cambodia Tuol Sleng prison and the Killing Fields.  I saw the photos of the ordinary men, women and children tortured to death as they were seen as “enemies of the state” which were typically intellectuals, people who wore glasses or enemies of the Khmer Rouge. If you didn’t do what the authorities wanted you were killed on the spot. Or they were simply selected on some made up criteria. I saw the beds they tortured them on, I saw the torture equipment, I saw the bars on the windows. This was a converted high school. In fact the head of the prison  Duch was a former Math’s teacher.  Refer https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/01/world/asia/duch-kaing-guek-eav-dead.html

I walked through the torture chambers and felt this darkness that I felt deeply. I could feel the energy.  I saw a sign instructing those tortured were not allow to call out, they were not allowed to cry, they had to stay silent as they were brutalised.  This is what it said

THIS IS THE SIGN OUTSIDE OF TUOL SLENG PRISON, CAMBODIA

1. You must answer according to my questions – don’t turn them away
2. Don’t try to hid the facts by making pretexts this and that you are strictly prohibited to contest me
3. Don’t be fool for you are a chap who dare to thwart the revolution
4. You must immediately answer my questions without wasting time to reflect
5. Don’t tell me either about our immoralities or the essence of the revolution 6. While getting lashes or electrification you must not cry at all
7. Do nothing, sit still and wait for my orders. If there is no order, keep quiet. When I ask you to do something you must do it right away without protesting
8. Don’t make pretext about Kampuchea Krom in order to hide your secret or traitor
9. If you don’t follow the above rules you shall get many lashes of electric wire
10. If you disobey any point of my regulations you shall get lashes or five shocks of electric discharge

I sat outside this prison in a state of shock. I deeply contemplated Gandhi, Hitler and peace education which is my calling.

I am contemplating mind control.

Today I am contemplating Melbourne.

I am contemplating the brutalising of my fellow citizens. I do not think violence is the “right thing” to do when the virus is mild for the majority. 

I am contemplating the wearing of face masks to make something not visible appear visible.  I perceive it not unlike the burqa. 

I am contemplating extremism in respect of extreme measures and questioning if they are proportionate to the reality? 

I am contemplating the Belt and Road and 26 planes that flew into Melbourne just after I left July 2020 (reported on Facebook with pictures).

I am contemplating totalitarianism and the great fear within those who desire control so they can be free to do what they want without regard for others.

I keep seeing the soap given to the Jews being told they were having a shower when they were being exterminated.

I am contemplating regime change from democracy to technocracy (automation, AI)  in my country Australia to a totalitarian dictatorship that is eroding day by day rights we thought we had evolved to and soldiers say they fought for (hence why people gather at the shrine of remembrance).  The signs are clear.

I am cntemlating a Brave New World and the New World Order.

I am contemplating Crimes Against Humanity that have not been held to account.  I am seeing Geoffrey Robertson Q.C. not in a hypothetical.

I believe leaders, police, civilians, soldiers, power brokers must be held accountable if they are complicit in crimes against the public across the world. 

Violence and toxic culture do not keep people safe or healthy.  It is not the right thing to do despite whether you agree or disagree. Australia is a nonviolent society and we do not want people incited into violence to justify further draconian restrictions at will.

I am feeling a vision that change is coming. I am seeing accountability being demanded by people across the world. I can feel the tide turning very strongly.  I can see war crimes against civil society being made visible.

We do not want another Nazi Germany.  I want a renewable earth where we no longer divide, where we come together in unity and we pre-serve out planet for future generations. This means learning to live in harmony and peace. I am a peacemaker and it can be done when we choose.

We will return to Nazism if the world chooses it out of fear.  Love creates a new story. The public are truly the ones with power, but many are frightened into giving it up. Stand in your own truth even if you are shaking.

The Spirit of J.F. Kennedy, COVID-19 Lies and Fear Campaign

In the public interest.

What love about Robert F Kennedy Jr is his focus on children’s health.  In Melbourne when I was doing video’s I felt inspired to put J.F. Kennedy’s picture on the wall behind me (refer Worldpeacefull Empowerment). Some how this picture kept turning up as I moved (homeless).  I felt his spirit very strong. I wondered at it.  The Kennedy’s were not perfect but they did have the heart of the people in mind, they stood as a bulwalk against tyranny. Their power was their ability to speak the language of humanity.

Robert Kennedy Junior is like his father Robert (and Uncle Jack), who both would be proud of him.  Any Kennedy who stands up get’s shot down which shows you the courage of Robert Kennedy Jnr.  Virtues are more important than even life. I look for the heroes in this world who put the people before profit, and he would be one of them. I will note down his words. He doesn’t use a teleprompter.

With Excerpts from Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s Speech to a Mass Protest Movement in Berlin

  • they will report that he will speak to 3-5000 Nazis, I look at this crowd and I see the opposite of Nazism. I look at this crowd and I see all the flags of Europe, I see people of every nation, every religion all caring about human dignity, children’s health, political freedom. this is the opposite of Nazism.
  • It is a mystery to me that all of these big important people like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci have been planning and thinking about this pandemic for decades. planning it so we all would be safe when the pandemic finally  it came now that it is here they don’t seem to know what they are talking about. they seem to be making it up as they go along. they are inventing numbers. They cannot tell you what the case fatality rate of COVID that is basic, they can’t give us a PCR test that works, they have to change the definition of COVID on the death certificates constantly to make it look more and more dangerous
  • One thing they are good at is pumping up fear the only thing a government needs to make people into slaves is fear. If you can figure out something to get them scared you can get them to do anything that you want
  • The commentator is By Prof Michel Chossudovsky from Centre for Research on Globalisation
  • Based in Montreal
  • COVID-19 fear campaign, propaganda support to the agenda that is being imposed upon us
  • on March 11 2020 193 countries were instructed to implement the lockdown as well as close down their economies.  Closure of the global economy of the entire planet.
  • We have been led to believe that this devastating decision that has resulted in bankruptcies, mass unemployment, poverty, despair was taken as a view to resolve a public health concern the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • People around the world are protesting in major European capitals and the media ha barely reported he significance of these protests. they have assigned these mass movements to so-called right wing extremists, particularly in Berlin, where  a group that did not belong to the protest movement assaulted the Reichstag, know from history represents democracy.
  • The imposition of social distancing, the face mask, closing down schools, disruption of health care system is not a solution to reducing the impacts of COVID-19 via the virus.
  • Why am I saying that? We have a fear campaign that is based on lies and fabrications. The legitimacy of these far reaching decisions to close to down the economic landscape, going to museums, going to sports events.
  • It is based on depicting COVID-19 as a dangerous virus, that is the basis of the fear campaign. If you consult official documents including the World Health Organisation, the Center for Disease Control based in Atlanta, Georgia and other scientific documents.  COVID-19 is NOT angerous disease. It is viewed by scientists and medical doctors akin similar to seasonal influenza.  It is a coronavirus, so is seasonal influenza. The sources for this statements on seasonal influenza come from prominent figures such as Anthony Fauci, Robert Redfield (head of CDC) and they in their peer viewed reports In The New England Journal of Medicine (refer https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMe2002387?articleTools=true
  • If similar to influenza portray the virus as a disease, the ailment what results from the virus is respiratory problems, plus pneumonia. That is the description provided by the World Health Organisation, similar features to influenza which is caused by virus A,B,C,D and sub categories of those viruses.
  • If the Journalists had done a bit of research and looked at peer reviewed reports, they don’t, had they told us it was similar to influenza there wouldn’t have been a fear campaign.
  • The second element has to do with the estimates.  The estimates of COVID positive. Those estimates constitute the political ammunition so to speak. Politicians will refer to the number 10’s of thousands of cases, they will never talk about recover.  COVID positive tests. They will look at the death, mortality data and this will be part of the fear campaign.
  • Bare in mind if you look carefully at the tests that are undertaken to support these political statements. There is no proof that COVID-19 is threatening humanity requiring the closing down of planet earth. Let me pause and analyse a PCR Test, that is a standard test that requires taking a specimen in the nose or throat, sending it to the lab. It is subjected to a procedure. What is important to underscore. This test DOES NOT IDENTIFY the virus, COVID-19.  What it does is that it detects VIRAL PARTICLES, GENETIC SEQUENCES, not the whole virus. That is very important. It also means that the positive test could be the result of other coronaviruses. Those maybe the coronaviruses related to seasonable influenza.  The actual test that comes up positive. Those statements are well confirmed in official documents. A positive test does NOT prove it is COVID-19 it could be another coronavirus.  They never isolate a single virus, they have fragments of different viruses. Ultimately these fragments of different viruses are aggregated (added up) then they lead in the logic of the PCR tests they lead to positive.
  • If you read the reports a positive COVID doesn’t mean you are infected by COVID, could be another virus.  Could mean other things such as bacteria. It detects a whole number of viruses. In-effect that test, bluntly in layman terms, is particles of viral materials positive. In other words you have a whole series of viral particles and so on and the test is either positive/negative it is a amalgam of particles it is NOT a single virus.  COVID-19 CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED IN THOSE TESTS. Very important
  • Look at official definitions, you might have COVID-19 but you may have another virus there that is infecting you.  It is not the virus, the number of viruses which are picked up, what is important is if you have symptoms of breathing, pneumonia.
  • That is the first thing Coronavirus positive does not mean you have the virus. Coronavirus negative does not mean you are negative.  If you look at this in detail it is a big LIE.  The test is a valid test but if it is taken out of context and interpreted with labels COVID-19 plus you are infected, it becomes a tool of propaganda.  What I have presented has been documented by doctors, documented by CDC.  Fauci will concur with this definition but when he goes on CNN he will say it is 10 x worse than seasonal influenza. So he is lying to himself and misleading the public.
  • It is akin to seasonal influenza. The test does not reveal anything specific regarding COVID-19 because it does not ISOLATE the virus.
  • Other concepts:  The PCR Test is considered to be a confirmed test, you don’t question it.  There are other concepts that are presumptive, possible they don’t require lab testing. Some do some don’t. They do not provide firm evidence of COVID plus and very often they are based on a diagnosis of a medical doctor. You might have fever some of the symptoms, bang you are categorized.
  • So called confirmed cases which are not confirmed, they are lumped together with the presumptive and possible cases to get total cases. Again it is a mechanism of inflating the numbers.  These estimates are in fact FALSE, they don’t tell us anything about COVID-19 there is a tendency to inflate the numbers.
  • In the United Kingdom the British government quietly said we have 1.3 million cases of PCR tests which were counted double, we counted them twice. That has been known since May. They didn’t do anything. They admit we made a big mistake. There are 1.3 million tests that are invalid. The medical professionals responsible for taking these tests, standard, take one in the nose and one in the throat. If the patient is positive the patient is positive. In this case in the UK her majesty’s government, they multiply by 2. If you get positive in the throat and positive in your nose you are considered as having the disease two times. COVID-19 x 2 and the figures go high.  The figures date back to the inception.  Boris Johnson said we are in a difficult situation we will lock down the British economy.
  • Let me turn my attention to death certificates.  First of all they change the criteria for establishing the death certificate. Historically there are guidelines given to health professionals and doctors for establishing the cause of death. In the United States they changed the criteria and they dismissed in a sense, that you could at a elderly age die from heart attack, cancer, that Coronavirus 19 would take precedence over other causes of death. A research group associated with the Center directed by Robert Kennedy Junior have made estimates. They say there is a 90% discrepancy in relation to the criteria used previously and historically as a result of these new criteria a bias of 90% in the figures.  The CDC in a sense concurs, it is the question of what is the principle cause of mortality.  CDC concurs and says 94% of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 have comorbidities in other words they may have cancer, heart attack, other diseases they say 94% of the COVID plus in any event doesn’t measure anything, as I mentioned previously. That 94% have comorbidities and other causes of death that might have been the real cause of death in any event the test is flawed and misleading.
  • There is another thing which I noticed digging beyond into official CDC documents. This the following: “The rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not” let me explain what is he underlying cause of death defined by the World health Organisation. It is the cause which moves a person to mortality (death) in other words in terms of a actual chain of occurrences it is the trend towards, medical term underlying cause of death. What the statement says is I repeat “COVID-19 being the underlying cause of death more often than not” what the health professional has to do is make sure it is more often than not. So if they just put in coronavirus to his COVID-19 test, that is not valid, coronavirus is the correct assessment to the PCR Test but it is not valid.  If they die of a heart attack and COVID-19 is there they might in fact say that COVID-19 is the cause of death. We have cases of motorcycle accidents, the cause of death, was some ambiguity, journalists were there were adamant, they said died of COVID-19, why? he tested positive the positive test doesn’t mean anything. the motorcycle accident, they wanted to dismiss it, more people would be tabulated as COVID-19 deaths. We must be skeptical of these numbers a) the PCR test does not identify the virus b) the mortality data is manipulated.  We saw that in Italy where they said something in the order of 93% of those tested COVID-19 positive died of OTHER CAUSES as far as the death certificate is concerned. the mortality of 25,000 was attributed to COVID-19 debated in parliament, 93% died of other causes.  So there we have it.
  • We have the mask, I don’t need to get into the literature face mask.  It is detrimental to your health it is well documented. Even Fauci says it then he denies it.  All the scientific literature will say it is detrimental in specific ways.
  • Social distancing is detrimental it destroys the social fabric of our societies. It undermines the right to education in schools, colleges and universities. It denies the right to have cultural events, football  events these are fundamental rights.  In as much as the data is questionable, what is the justification for preventing people from being together from meeting with their families, going out, from protesting.  Social distancing has all the features of a totalitarian state.  Visit our site https://www.globalresearch.ca/

Are We COVID Monkey’s or is the Magic in Questions?

In the public interest.

Are people dividing into those who do the right thing and those who don’t? Are we blaming people for the shutdown, for the spread of COVID-19 or are we acting out of our own fear and pain and then after a while we just believe without question that persecuting others is the right thing to do as they are trouble makers?

What if the monkey’s are acting out of fear and not allowing one monkey to rise to get the bananas which will nourish the other monkey’s?  We also hold each other down and we call this the tall poppy syndrome.

Media divides us as leaders clearly speak about the right thing to do mirroring the narrative worldwide. What if the right thing is to question the truth of what has been justified as delivered in the interests of public health and safety for the majority?

What if restrictions are unhealthy? What if they kill more people due to the lower immune system, less oxygen, basic needs unmet, domestic conflict, loss of hope for the future, lack of vitamin D, poverty, homelessness etc.?What if our mental health is the greatest determinant of our wellness or sickness?

What do you think?  What is your feeling? (the latter is more accurate)

Do we shut down different views because a narrative has said that counterveiling views are dangerous?  Is that true?

What if they are whistle-blowers, doctors, virologists and a growing group of others voices who see differently provide accurate insight into the facts and move us away from political voices that may or may not be trustworthy or working for the highest good? What voices work 100% in the public interest?

Does democracy makes others unsafe – is that true? What if disclosure of new information makes society safe? What if debate flushes up new issues we hadn’t considered?  What if those sick had the chance to talk about their experiences? What if their families had the chance to visit them? 

What if psychological and physical suppression is a form of toxicity or subtle covert violence that makes us unsafe or unwell in respect of creating imbalance?  What of control and no freedom? Is that healthy? What of a unravelling democratic systems, principles and the Constitution? What if there is an agenda for a Republic which removes basic protections? What if democracy makes us safe?

A woman said to me yesterday, “I keep an open mind.” I was pleased to hear it. We discussed bandwagons and how people get swept up by fear and believe everything they see without doing research to find out the truth from a range of perspectives. There is no enemy only ignorance and understanding liberates us from fear.

Do we hate those who don’t know, or hate those with a different view? Or do we reserve a space inside to say “s/he may be right, I may be wrong.” Or “I may be right s/he may be wrong”, either way people’s beliefs belong to them not me or visa versa. We find years later the truth eventually comes out, 911 is a case in point.

She said she and her husband are from Melbourne but have been travelling for 3 months around Australia. Whenever they try and stay at a hotel or caravan park they show their Victorian licence and people then say ‘no’ they can’t stay as if they are perceived likely to be infected with a deadly disease, when they are healthy.

This is crazy and it reflects how fear controls our lives and how we treat people. We can’t take a chance they would say.  They let people move on, how does the couple from Melbourne feel? Like lepers?  How easily our country becomes divided because of the constant COVID 19 storyline that is projected constantly with no respite.  Mind control works the same way. 

How quickly we become separated States and then see the other as “bad” when they are us, all Australians.  Then other political narratives are put in the media narrative to subtly discredit the political party (Labor) with the objective of winning all States and perhaps with a longer term goal of undermining the State system with the idea of centralising power for full control. These words come out with such subtly, as they say they are in plain sight, but if you don’t now politics you will miss it.

Clearly the couple are not sick but because someone relegated a whole city of 5,000,000 as a hotspot when there were initially officially few cases and of today now 800 alleged COVID-19 deaths. The testing is not certain as it is asserted that SARS-COV-2 shares around 80% of DNA as COVID. Moreover, it is stated that a chimpanzee monkey shares 99% of DNA yet we are not chimpanzees. Thus the same logic applies with SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19 (descriptor) may not be in the same family as a coronavirus. As genetic groupings are far more defined.  So how can they know how to test?

When I was in quarantine in Canberra I said to officials that I was willing to get a test but the ACT Department of Health didn’t test me. They never even came to see me. They had been texting people to fill out a survey on their phones. The only reason I spoke to them is I don’t have a phone (EMF radiation causes brain cancer, my cousin is dying she worked on the phone). So they rang on the phone every day asking questions about symptoms and I asked questions. I was forced to pay $1700 for quarantine when I was well. I was on a very low income (student) and there was no accommodation offered that was affordable, all at rates professional people pay, completely inequitable. My mother paid on credit card.

So the point is I am well and forced to pay to visit my family because someone in an official position has announced a whole city is a hotspot when the alleged death rate is only 0.00161 (800/4.9 million) of the population, yet perceptions dominant, people watch endless media that is constantly pumping out the same message and they believe it is everywhere.

Psychologically, the masks reinforce this image and they have health impacts as bacteria and viruses are breathed in and out and if there is infection it reinfects the person. Oxygen is lowered due to the mouth being covered. A subatomic virus is so tiny that it travels through face masks. Major Douglas Rokke an expert in the Pentagon is a chemical and biological weapons expert and was in charge of decontamination and training for the US military. He stated to imagine how porous masks are imagine the virus is like a small dot in the middle of a sports stadium, the space around that dot is the pores in the mask. He said it is not droplets it is a mist, so it appears the misinformation is coming from the CDC and those repeating it or staying quiet.  Major Douglas Rokke is a medical doctor, he was the US Military’s top expert.  He was the key person in charge of 100,000’s of  military personnel to ensure they are safe from contamination or exposures. He would have a higher status than the CDC.  Is he wrong?

A whistle-blower virologist Dr Judy Mikovits stated the masks don’t work they will make people sicker. She was astounded this advice was given. So who do we choose to believe?  We fear being like the one monkey climbing the ladder to be beaten up or ganged up on because that monkey is not doing the “right” thing. Or do we all get together and support them monkey so that they can reach the tap to turn off the cold water, metaphoric for pouring cold water on the truth and calling it conspiracy theory. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard this trotted out as people repeat what they hear without questioning.

I’d been in Melbourne and got out on the day of the full border closure (23/24 July), I was initially refused as I didn’t have a NSW Permit but had a ACT permit. It was crazy to tell me after midnight that I had to go back. I told the police I am not going back. They escort me to Wodonga, my car is full of my things and I had no credit card. Where to sleep. I got lucky I met a guy having a smoke and he tried to pay a swipe card for me to get a room (I had cash for him – don’t use credit cards). I got lucky and he let me stay in the spare bed there. He was a gentleman. I met a MP the next day and he got me out, I was so happy.

I don’t want to rebel against authority but I have to stay true to myself as I am not allowing governments to force me to do things I know are unhealthy for me and could impact my health. Truth is more important than doing the “right thing”. How many follow others into harms way as group think wins rather than truth. I have to stay in integrity. I can’t stay as I don’t agree with the masks and see it as psychological in making COVID visible when it is not everywhere. I live alone and I am not living in a world where I am gagged, can’t breathe or can’t see a friendly smile and under what feels to me as house arrest when I am not a criminal. I have to breathe fresh air, be in the sun, feel free. Mostly I distance in any case as I work alone and this is my normal (as do most people). Ironically they let people go to supermarkets (large gatherings) and shutdown small shops (small numbers). It was not logical nor fair. Then they put them on job keeper which only indebts the country with foreign equity which will justify selling off public assets. That is what I saw as a trained economist. It was not healthy or logical in my book if this is about a virus. The big multinationals made a exorbitant profits (many foreign) stock exchange stocks rose and Australian local businesses collapsed. These businesses are the foundation to the Australian economy and work force (particularly for young people). Closing them down forces collapse and puts those people in a situation where they have no power and I am sure some suicided as they saw all their hard work go down the tube. As this goes on in Melbourne those businesses will not recover. It felt this alleged pandemic like an assault against the Australian people and their businesses, given the virus is mild (less than flu remember).

I went over the border to be free as that is the life I have to live for my health. I was that one monkey who took the chance, I didn’t allow myself to be constantly put in a position where I had to suffer what was thrown at us. I did not want to get used to giving up my power or my democracy. I could see the dominant narrative was creating danger for those who disagree, I saw that as mind control.

In my experience I had not seen one person sick nor did I know anyone with COVID. I read that COVID means Certificate of Vaccination ID. Something to consider. I am not saying there is not a novel virus, but I encourage everyone to question what is going on, to look at the vested interests and wake up to the world we are in. Who benefits? Is it lab created or natural and novel. The evidence is pointing to lab created as there is a patent on a coronavirus by the Pirbright Institute, go and research it. As you explore and investigate it leads to more questions about a global agenda which is not a new idea.

If the answer is yes that this is deliberate then look at the economies around the world being collapsed. Then you climb that ladder and have a good hard look as the future and think about the impacts on our children. This is reason enough to climb the ladder. Invite questions (both sides), invite ideas, invite different perspectives then sift for the truth. Work together. Find evidence from virologists, doctors, insiders etc. Anyone can find out if truth is their decision rather than following the crowd. We all get to choose.

A few links to get you started (swinging between a few trees, maybe find some fruit). Maybe you are a monkey’s uncle (ha ha) or maybe a monkey wrench (we call peaceniks who throw a spanner in the works this) or maybe monkey magic (remember the apes in MONKEY, watched that as a kid). We need some magic right now to make visible what is hidden.

Monkey 1: Dr Mikovits



Monkey 2: Doug Rokke

Monkey 3: Dr Kaufman

The actual deaths are extremely low and it appears that coronavirus is in flu shots and there are many types. So we can’t be sure the accuracy. But let’s just say 800/4,967,733 or 0.016% of the population have COVID as of September. How many died from preconditions, how many were near someone deemed to have COVID? What about exosomes (secretions from poison cells – Stress, EMF etc) apparently according to Dr Kaufman he saw the Wuhan DNA sequencing and indicated it was the same as SARS-COV-2, so he believes the range of respiratory, coughs, headaches could have other sources. So we have to have critical thinking here. Obviously if it is true we want the truth but if there is an agenda, we need to know as people’s lives are at risk. How did the numbers jump from 100 to 800 in a few months in Melbourne but nowhere else, so was it restrictions that have caused ill health and a spike? For those who they state had COVID the majority 93% recovered and only those with compromised immunity can die. Dr Kaufman does speak of the low oxygen in the lungs and people breathing normally and then dying from respirators (pushing air in). So the novel virus may well have this feature and the medical intervention may be the cause of death, again more questions have to be asked.

There are higher deaths from the flu (1500-3000 per year) and the reality with flu is that the virus constantly changes so they can’t immunise. Moreover, the drop in flu sure could be related to stay at home, social distancing but there could be other reasons. We have to open our minds and explore for truth. Yes it can be risky but millions around the world are sufferings and we ow it to them as world citizens to all help in solving a problem but not shutting people down or prsecuting differences. I am a pacemaker and in my training in conflict resolution we solve the problem we don’t hate people. No matter who they are inclusive of those involved.

Are we really questioning why the cold water is being thrown on us and is it because someone broke the rules or should we all support each other, allow the monkey to climb the ladder, perhaps they are coming from a broader perspective. If we are in a democracy they have a right to climb the ladder.