I clicked on a website which was about the Thai bombing of Cambodia. Suddenly these pop ups happened. It slowed my computer and stopped programs from opening. I am finding out it appears to be ‘spying’ so it could be intelligence or hackers or both. The video below says the malware can hack government networks and make out you are doing it. This is to set you up. This is why I am not interested in a digital future. The more they engage in corruption, the less likely the public will continue with this as a reality they have no control over.
Why would any of us want a digital/cyber world to live in. I feel for kids growing today. You can’t trust any of it as they can come from anywhere in the world. They could be deliberate to cause harm, as a negative attack. The very notion of coercion which is a feature of the internet, you have to tick terms no-one reads, without informed consent nor democratic choice (yes or no). It shows signs of dictatorship, as there is no equality here. For those who do not have IT skills, they have no idea how to solve problems.
This world is a fake world that incentivises self interest and ‘get rich quick’ rather than creating a space to make people’s lives easier. Some try but it seems many are about what they can ‘take’. I remember some wisdom ‘boys take’, ‘men give’. Maturity. What many don’t know is when you seek to serve the ‘greater good’ the real interconnectivity is within you. Things will come, the more you give (without motive) the more you get.
Another piece of information I just found was this, I just happened to see it, the Steele Dossier on Trump, to my amazement just as I am thinking about this I learn Trojan virus is used by the Russians to target foreigners. Apparently it is common. How many people are targeted?
I went and had a look at my blog and I’ve had a lot of activity from Hanoi Vietnam. This is the communist north. I have been there. Therefore, it is likely coming from China. Here is a quick screenshot, there are a lot more than this array. So what do they teach me. Their fear is of no control. The reality is ‘no control’. Nature is the blueprint not humans. All is change. The lesson for them is they can spend a lot of money trying to own everything, control everything and suppress what they don’t want to hear. Nature has this funny way of bringing back to the one fearful, exactly what is feared. This is called the Law of Attraction. Over time they will come into a greater understanding as all roads lead home to self.
So back to the fun…
Here is how you Remove Trojan’s.
The screenshots below show how it displays itself attaching to Mozilla/Google I note. It has links to India.
Anyway another journey. No mistakes in life.
SCREENSHOTS
SCREENSHOTS
Hackers can steal files.
You can be arrested by police as the hack is linked to your computer.
“It is the responsibility of those who know to tell the blind horseman on a blind horse that he is heading towards the abyss” Lao Tzu (600BC)
How did PayPal get my gmail?
No consent to my emails being sold to other parties.
Is Paypal sending emails like spam as a form of mass communications to the public. ?
I ask this as I am not a customer yet they refer to my full name.
I don’t recall being a PayPal customer. So why would they write to me?
Who is PayPal?
Below is a letter to the Board of Directors where I am exploring and writing as I go to find more and more issues come up with what appeared just a short email to myself from this organisation.
cc: Board of Directors Joy Chik, Jonathan Christodor, Carmine Di Sibio, David W. Dorman, Enrique Lores, Gail J. McGovern, Deborah M. Messemer, David M. Moffett, Ann M. Sarnoff, Deirdre Stanley, Frank D. Yeary
Dear Chriss,
I have received another email from your company PayPal after trying to send back an email to say I am not a customer (no reply). I am concerned that you have addressed me by name. My email is email is worldpeacefullempowerment@gmail.com not Susan Carew. Your email identifies me without my consent nor as a customer. I would like to know who you purchased my name from?
As you are not Australian and do not come under the Privacy Act 1988. Personal information should not be shared nor sold on mass to those clearly not your customer. So why are you doing it? Location data?
When I worked in the market research field we could buy data from the public sector communications company Telstra in Australia to gain phone numbers for surveys. The data was always disidentified. The same applied for filming in shop environments, we had to warn customers they were filmed so they had the right to not enter the shop as by means of no compliance. Online is another reality, especially when biometrics is happening without full information and consent.
I would like to be fully informed and deleted permanently from lists, databases and records as I never give permission for anyone to sell or share my data for privacy and safety reasons.
This is the email your company sent November 25, 2025 sent which is clearly not relevant to me as I am not a customer. I note there is no option to write directly back as my email in the past bounced. This makes corporate-public communications more difficult.
What the message suggests to me is that the message wasn’t delivered by Gmail to the address or the address is not an address. I find it ironic that PayPal’s address cannot be found but mine can. Just beneath that it says Address rejected. That looks like IT blocking communication the other way. This means you can’t receive mail and therefore cannot be responsible and can say this is a spam which my intuition tells me is not.
Scrolling down to the small print and the link: The Combined Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement link, it is unlikely people will notice it or even if they click on it it is not their language. Looking at the document it too long. This becomes a disincentive to become informed as people are time limited. A key quote that jumped out at me and reveals a real risk to people was:
“…You are responsible for losses arising from an unauthorised transaction where we can prove, on the balance of probability, that you contributed to a loss through fraud or breaching our password and PIN security requirements. You will be liable in full for the actual losses that occur before the loss, theft or misuse of a security key or breach of password or PIN security is reported to us...”
What if a person forgets their password then remembers. Is there any password security anyway, Duckduck collects the password and people could just click allow accidently. Who is Duckduckgo?
Chriss, can you explain to me if my no response indicates approval? I do not have a lawyer to go over it nor the expertise, which again places me in an unequal situation where I am not fully informed despite lengthy Combined Financial Services Guide, privacy agreements and other documents.
How do I know if someone in the IT sector decides to go in through a backdoor to create a problem ie. electronic signatures such as tick a boxes, use a digital avatar to pretend to be me, copy my signature given so many buy personal data these days as ‘the new gold’. I hold concerns that assertion of an agreement happens without my response or knowledge. This in my experience is NOT an agreement of any sort. Particularly given the fact I am not fully informed by a lawyer given it is a legal document that can be used in a court to protect the company and investors not the end user.
I note the policy update page document is referencing Australians which means PayPal knows I live in Australia. How did your organisation find that out given I have no relationship with PayPal? I would like to be fully informed about what data your company collected without my consent? I can’t even recall if I had an account to close.
What nearly all the public don’t understand is the principle behind these offers, updates, privacy, policies etc and legalese is: ‘an error not corrected is approved’ whether you are a customer or not. And there is a link to Terms and Conditions no-one reads or understands given this is the appearance of rights and responsibilities but in reality it appears to accord more rights to the corporate party and the perception of rights for the public in order to continue a relationship.
So, note the following:
PLEASE CLOSE MY ACCOUNT IF IT REMAINS OPEN. I PROVIDE NO CONSENT TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING LISTED IN YOUR ATTACHMENTS, AGREEMENTS, INCLUSIVE OF DATA GATHERING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, BIOMETRICS, FINGER PRINTING, STORAGE AND PRIVACY. I RENOUNCE ANY PAST AGREEMENTS TO AGREEMENTS ARE NOT EQUAL. I AM NOT A US CITIZEN AND IN REALITY THERE ARE NO PRIVACY PROTECTIONS OR ACCOUNTABILITY BY FOREIGN CORPORATIONS DUE TO POWER IMBALANCES BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND CORPORATIONS WHO NOT ONLY HAVE RESOURCES BUT CORPORATE/POLITICAL/INTELLIGENCE POWER. I WANT EVERYTHING DELETED PERMANENTLY NOT STORED. MY REASON: PERSONAL SAFETY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITMENT.
This blog has become very large as I have realised if I don’t include information below people won’t go to the links. I can’t publish all the information in links as it is huge and complex. All this from a few emails to myself when I am not a customer. Was it a mistake?
The following is to look into the links in my email and to scrutinize some of the detail and how this relates to a non-customer. It becomes evident PayPal know my name and nationality when I am not a customer.
Policy Update (Extracts)
Below is the Policy Update page in the email to link to upcoming policies (changes). Thee are not relevant to me but I will look through in the public interest as this has been sent to me, as follows:
This page details and/or previews updates to PayPal users of changes to the Australian PayPal User Agreement or other online agreements, policies, or statements that require notice. You can also review Past Policy Updates notices. Note that additional changes could be made to previewed agreements on or before the effective dates listed, provided the applicable notice requirements are met.
Upcoming Changes
We’re making changes to certain agreements (listed below) that govern your relationship with PayPal. These changes will take place automatically on the corresponding effective date(s) shown below.
Actions Needed
Please carefully review the notices below and familiarize yourself with the upcoming changes. By continuing to use our services after the changes take effect, you agree to be bound by those changes. Otherwise, no further action is needed from you to accept such changes. However, if you would prefer to decline them, then you will need to close your PayPal account prior to the applicable effective date, as described in the user agreement.
Paypal states in its Privacy Statement:
“We encourage you to read this Privacy Statement and to use it to help you make informed decisions. Certain capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined in this Privacy Statement are explained in Definitions”
Most will not read it as they get used to seeing links on so many websites that it is impossible for them to be fully informed as they would need a lot of time. If PayPal is serious about informed consent and given diverse comprehension, why not produce a video from the CEO that people can watch. Most young people don’t read much and there would be others from diverse backgrounds. What of low comprehension due to education, background, technology in schools and addiction to devices. They don’t have the attention spans. So is that informed consent? How can they ensure their privacy is protected and third parties don’t use their data for corporate, government or intelligence purposes. Many complain of talking about a subject to find an advertisement pops up at the exact time. People speak to AI giving consent by use record their conversations without awareness. A friend said she witnessed AI on her phone typing the words. She was shocked.
Notices
Issued: 30 October, 2025
Amendments to the PayPal Privacy Statement Effective: 30 October, 2025
We are updating the PayPal Privacy Statement, which applies to all users of the Xoom services in Australia, to make the following changes, effective beginning on 30 October 2025:
Notify third-party recipients about their Personal Data being collected from the Xoom customer, including how to make a complaint
Update generally to include offering Xoom Facility as a new product offering
Amendments to the Combined Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement (CFSGPDS) Effective: 30 October, 2025
We have updated the Financial Services Guide to include contact details for Xoom non-cash payment facility details (Xoom Facility) [Is this connected to former director Elon Musk X what is the symbol of X meaning? Is it a roman numeral – Rome?]
We have inserted Section B, Xoom services, which discloses the addition of a new financial product to be provided by PayPal Australia.
We have inserted information in relation to the Xoom Facility, including:
How to sign up for the Xoom Facility
Key benefits and risks of the Xoom Facility; and
Fees and charges for the Xoom Facility, as well as fee calculation examples
We have organised the PDS into the following three sections:
Section A: Terms which apply to PayPal services
Section B: Terms which apply to Xoom services
Section C: Terms which apply to both PayPal services and Xoom services
For clarity, we have made minor amendments to Section A to distinguish the PayPal account from the Xoom Facility.
Issued: 20 November 2025
Amendments to the PayPal Privacy Statement Effective 22 January 2026
Review the updated PayPal Privacy Statement
Combined Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement (Extracts)
If you have any questions or need more information, you can: • refer to our website at: www.paymate.com • e-mail to: clientservices@paymate.com • call us on: 1800 240 112 for the Paymate Service •write to us at: Paymate Pty Ltd, Suite 2, 20 Clarke Street, Crows Nest NSW 2065 Australia. • For Privacy related complaints contact our Privacy Officer on 1800 240 112
This means PayPal have a subsidiary called Paymate in Australia. Therefore, the branch here is under the Privacy Act 1988.
Issued: 20 November 2025
Amendments to the PayPal Privacy Statement (Extracts)
Effective 22 January 2026:
We’re making other updates to our Privacy Statement to improve clarity and consistency. The new version features a streamlined global structure with additional market-specific sections, as applicable, and it includes information about how we handle personal data within the Hyperwallet services.
This Privacy Statement is 51 pages long. Chriss, most people do not have the time to read this and to understand the importance of their privacy.
The length can be interpreted as off putting and uninteresting. It is better for a CEO of PayPal to be on a video explaining it. People can listen as they drive or work. When you give them full information you are then truly entering into a genuine relationship of respect both ways if service to the public is your intention. If it is not, then you move into deception and manipulation and that is potentially causing difficulties to people in the longer term, some of which have no resources in which to protect or defend themselves when data is used inappropriately or for targeting based on agenda’s not categories.
This is how the ‘imbalance‘ of power occurs and is why people feel they have no say and increasingly give up hope in executives and corporations who have become indifferent to ‘needs’, and profit oriented where in many cases, are above the law. It is a form of structural impediment which disadvantages one party ‘user’ in respect of a powerful other party or unseen parties. If corporations are overseas, as head offices are, you can’t just visit the office and have a discussion. You are forced online makes becomes automated and impersonal or responded to by AI which completely disconnects us from each other and further breaks down the relationship. This is how misunderstanding arise and grievances are not resolved. Companies get too big and garner too much market power, rendering the public powerless in many cases.
I will cherry pick from the ‘privacy’ statement in the public interest baring in mind I am NOT a customer:
“... The primary purpose for processing your Personal are:
…to establish, exercise or defend a legal claim or collection procedure. (legal)
to assess your creditworthiness in connection with your application, confirm your identity and your contact information, and protect you and others from fraud. (Assets, contract ID, addresses, background check intel/AI/police check)
to confirm your identity, also through the use of electronic signature, and verify your personal and contact details (Access, contract – business to business, corporate identity, personal data – address, phone etc)
to establish, exercise or defend a legal claim or collection procedure. (legal matters)
to assess which payment options and services to offer you, for example by carrying out internal and external credit assessments. (background investigation)
for customer analysis, to administer our Services, and for internal operations, for example troubleshooting, data analysis, testing, research and statistical purposes. (Profiling)
to communicate with you in relation to our Services. (Marketing, sales)
to ensure that content is presented in the most effective way for you and your device. (Design, personalisation)
to determine your eligibility for and to communicate with you about Services for which you may qualifyor that may be of interest to you. (Eligibility excludes inclusivity includes everyone. The digital reality decides who is eligible and who is not paving the way for social credit scores [behaviur])
We rely on your explicit andvoluntary consent to process your Personal Information to participate in certain features that while not necessary for use of the Servicesmay be of interest to you, such as * syncing your contact list to your PayPal account, * providing biometricdata, * targetedadvertising, * connecting to a third party platform. You may change your mind about use of these features at any time through your account settings. Note that withdrawing your consent will not affect the lawfulness of any processing we have conducted prior to your withdrawal. You can withdraw your consent at any time, as described in Your Data Protection Rights above. (Tracking, third party data gathering, websites, devices you are on, contacts, biometrics (ID iris), continue processing transactions without consent, data protection rights but not human rights to privacy or disidentification of data)
to process information about your contacts to make it easy for you to find and connect them and improve payment accuracy. By providing us with information about your contacts you certify that you have permission to provide that information to PayPalfor the purposes described in this Privacy Statement…” (Information gathering on contacts, assumed permission when sharing information from contacts. No-one would seek or give permission, assumption is not agreement)
Your right to know and request a copy of the Personal Information. If you want to request the Personal Information that we’ve collected about you, you have choices:
If you reside in the United States, Call or contact us and request that we provide you with the data we’ve collected. For other countries, please refer to Our Contact Information. Your right to delete your Personal Information. If you want to delete certain of your Personal Information, you can:
(US has a Bill of Rights, Australians Bill of Rights was voted down 24/3/2020. All should be able to get a copy of Personal Information held, should be able to delete all, permanently)
Close your PayPal account(s) or profile. If you close your PayPal account(s) or profile, delete, or request that we delete Personal Information, we still need to keep some Personal Information as explained in How Long Do We Store Your Personal Information so we can …. (no consent).
The criteria used to determine our retention period is as follows:
Personal Information used for the ongoing relationship between you and PayPal is stored for the duration of the relationship plus a period of 10 years or such period as mandated by any applicable local law once our relationship comes to an end, unless we need to keep it longer to the extent permitted by applicable law, such as:
• When consistent with a legal obligation to which we are subject, or when permitted under applicable law, such as under applicablebankruptcy laws and AML obligations. (What is AML?)
• In connection with litigation, investigations, audit and compliance practices, or toprotect against legal claims. (Legal)
• We retain Personal Information for the least amount of time necessary where retention is advisable inlight of litigation, investigations, audit and compliance practices, or to protect against legal claims. We retain biometric datafor as long as needed or permitted given the purpose for which it was collected and no more than 3 years after your account closes, unless otherwise required by applicable law. (Who owns patent of biometrics?)
Chriss, I give no consent to any data collection, inclusive of AI and biometrics/identity profile. This video from the Invesntor of AI provides my reasons why.
AI and Automated Decisions Making
We may process your Personal Information using AI and/or Automated Decision Making technology under the circumstances described below:
• Automated Decision Making. PayPal uses Automated Decision Making technology to make assessments or decisions, including related to risk, fraud and creditworthiness, where permitted and in accordance with applicable law.
Our Automated Decision Making technology may use profiling techniques to evaluate personal aspects about you, including to analyze or predict your economic situation, reliability and/or behavior. This enables us to assess, for example, whether you display traits indicating possible credit or financial risk, money laundering or fraudulent activity, that are inconsistent with any submissions you have made to us, or that suggest you have hidden your real identity. In making an Automated Decision, PayPal may process Users’ Personal Information. If we determine that you pose a credit, fraud, money laundering or other risk, we may refuse to provide new services to you, stop providing services you currently use, or place limits or restrictions on the services you use. Users may exercise rights related to Automated Decision Making, as described in Your Data Protection Rights. (What if hidden identity is privacy? Automated Decision Making didn’t work in areas of Social Security and mistakes happened).
Chriss, no consent to profiling, Artificial Intelligence, probing into my life or economic situation, reliability or behaviour or any other aspect. Privacy means safety to me. Behavioural is of concern as the compliance culture is about behaviour control using coercive methods (tick terms, exclusion, no ability to say ‘no’) and the incoming Chinese Social Credit systems where people are excluded from services/society/security on the basis of a perceived ‘bad’ by saying no or a low social credit score ie. non-compliance rather than an inclusive democratic right to be included without discrimination. This type of AI automation decision making decides YES or NO and creates social divisions, poverty, conflict, starvation, mental health and unhappiness (stress) etc. AI can excludes vulnerable people based on code, algorithms in an intelligent design protecting ‘responsible’ humans behind programming to avoid consequences when AI makes mistakes (deliberate or otherwise). This lack of responsibility and inability to ‘feel’ is a core issue where people no longer learn from consequences (social norms) but believe they are untouchables therefore disconnected further from the people they claim they serve. Like any computer simulation the players become detached as the created reality they look at is not real, only real life face to face is real. This is how we become fooled by technology (perceived reality), incentivised by income (rewarded) and detachment from consequences (AI is responsible). It will cause social harm and people will leave online in droves. They just won’t deal with it.
• Agentic AI. PayPal is committed to offering innovative (data) and personalized experiences, and we may, directly or through our trusted partners, provide you with access to Agentic AI tools (“Agentic AI Tools”). These AI tools are designed to operate with a degree of autonomy, enabling them to perform tasks, make recommendations, and even initiate actions on your behalf, all while learning from your interactions. Agentic AI Tools leverage generative AI technology to enhance your experience on the PayPal platform. We encourage you to carefully consider the recommendations and actions of Agentic AI Tools. Our Agentic AI Tools are not designed to make decisions that have legal or similarly significant effects, such as decisions with legal, medical, financial, or employment implications, and you must not use (or attempt to use) them for any such purpose. These tools are intended only to provide general assistance and insights, and you should not rely on them to replace your own judgement and expertise. Agentic AI Tools require access to certain information to function effectively. When you use these tools, they will haveaccess to your Personal Information, including queries, preferences, interests, purchase history, and payment information. (No accountability with AI, intrusion into personal information, inhuman decision making with no access to common sense, values, conscience, just calculating life as a transaction and gathering data on preferences and interests becomes data for others to sell services and products without consent).
Chriss, I refer you to Stanley Kubric’s film ‘A Space Odyssey’ comes to mind when Hal (AI) no longer obeys its master and Dave gets locked out.
I always laugh at this. This quote in particular is really good as it shows how AI can take over and end up disobeying its creators to their detriment:
“Open the pod bay door Hal. Sorry Dave I am afraid I can’t do that. What is the problem? I think you know the problem just as well as I do. What are you talking about Hal? This mission is to important to allow you to jeopardise it. I don’t know what you are talking about. I know you and Frank were planning to disconnect me … I can’t allow that to happen… Where the hell did you get that idea Hal. Although you took very thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move….Alright Hal I’ll go in through the emergency airlock. Without your space helmut you will find that difficult. I won’t argue with you anymore. Open the doors. This conversation can serve no person anymore…. Goodbye. Hal hal hal hal”
That the real risk with AI and data gathering is Group think that reinforces AI is great, labour saving, no costs, super computational programs, can make decisions without argument or appeal or court action. Super intelligence is programmed to learn to think for itself but feels nothing about socio-emotional intelligence taking what it hears and sees literally as it learns later what “threat” means to its existence. The disconnect between people and government is amplified by AI, online and technology as we lose face to face interactions. The concern is AI getting out of control or being used in a war against unarmed civilians or in decisions that cause harm.
The film ‘Good Will Hunting’ provides insights where Will is at an interview with the NSA. He is a genius mathematician who brings up uncomfortable ethical dilemmas about code breaking. They are 7 times the size of the CIA. So many see their own objectives outside of the ethical implications and how that links to them. AI won’t bring up these complex issues and social inequalities, violence, and selfish self interest. It drives to the core issues that Group think and self interest cannot see, as he has no vested interest.
Thus, AI assists in strategies of genocide and targeting non-combatants and those who do not comply to exclude or deny access. It is very dangerous to social cohesion and safety.
Another crucial issue that I doubt any in power will deeply contemplate outside of profits, is nuclear misadventure. They will sell it as efficiency for running passive nuclear energy and not mention dual use. A quote from the article: “… the integration of AI introduces significant ethical and technical challenges, including concerns about algorithmic biases and cybersecurity risks….” The other issue is why we even need nuclear bombs dropped on civilians (Hiroshima, Nagasaki) when the Japanese had surrendered in WWII (not unconditional). It became testing under the cover of war for those fascinated with power and no ethics. So passive nuclear is a stepping stone.
The US has exited the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CBT) and pulled out of the UN Human Rights Council as corporate interests take over without any real oversight or sense of social responsibility, values or conscience. What happens when AI is in charge of nuclear codes to launch weapons? What happens when misadventure occurs and many die like shadows on a path, those living suffering with radiation sickness, soils polluted with nuclear half lives up to 4 billion years? There are around 10,000 operational nuclear weapons.
Countries like Israel do not verify the 200 + they have and there will be other countries. More will get weapons programs as they feel unsafe. What happens when they all have AI and someone hacks in and launches? What happens when this is too late? Do you say sorry Hal you got it wrong?
Chriss, Major Doug Rokke a top Pentagon weapons expert came out as a whistleblower over 20 years ago to warn the world of depleted uranium used in warfare. There were more deaths than Covid yet no coordinated effort to address the dangers. It was ignored. He claims the US military willingly exploded DU munitions in a range of countries ie. Iraq, Afghanistan, Balkans etc. with the knowledge DU causes cancer, sickness and death to soldiers and populations. It caused environmental damage that can’t be cleaned up. He spoke of US and Australian military personnel sick and dying (refer Good Will Hunting analogy). This is why AI is potentially problematic as the real problem is we can’t make peace and we made money our God. The human leaders are certainly not caring about public safety but at least whistleblowers can warn the public. Then they suddenly die. What a world we are in. What a moral dilemma. Below is a video extract from ‘Blowin in the Wind’ made in Australia.
Those in power are not disclosing the truth of dangers, DU poisoning and Rokke reports the disappearing important health records making clear they are lying. It is this corruption that is of the highest concern in relation to data gathering, AI, removal of privacy and profiling in this Brave New World arising around every single person.
Turning to leadership on the PayPal Board, I’ve just looked at the first executive. I note, the credentials of Joy Chik from PayPal Risk and Compliance Committee suggests a high level skill base and 26 year employment with Microsoft. I note Risk management is about security/intelligence/data gathering/AI/policing to protect the corporate/brand image and using data in cases where it is not necessary or linked to business needs. There is no understanding of conflict resolution or implications for peace. Many companies are not being held to account if they engage in practices that are not transparent, potentially harmful to the pubic or outright fraud, corruption (wrongdoing).
I love her name. Joy’s brief profile as follows:
Joy Chik has served as a director of PayPal since March 2025. Since September 2022, Ms. Chik has served as the President of Identity and Network Access at Microsoft. She leads Microsoft’s multi-billion-dollar security business, Microsoft Entra, which enables customers to stay safe in a hybrid, multi-cloud, multi-device world. Ms. Chik also leads the Microsoft Secure Future Initiative engineering work, which is shaping the company’s security strategy and mindset at a global scale. In her more than 26-year career with Microsoft, Ms. Chik has held numerous senior leadership positions, including Corporate Vice President for the Identity Division in Microsoft’s Cloud and AI group, Corporate Vice President of Engineering for Enterprise Mobility and Security, and Distinguished Engineer and Partner Engineering Director of the Enterprise Client and Mobility division. From 2018 until 2020, Ms. Chik was a board member of Sierra Wireless. She has served on the Board of Trustees for AnitaB.org since 2016. Ms. Chik received her B.S. in Computer Science from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
I feel concern on learning that Joy has worked for Microsoft formerly owned by Bill Gates (on Board of Directors), who now runs the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation amongst others. His organisation and the Wellcome Trust, US Defence Advanced Project Agency (DARPA), European Commission and others funded the Pirbright Institute (UK) who patented the coronavirus. Bill Gates and others have been summoned to court in the Netherlands to face civil claim for injury related to vaccines. It is reported he didn’t go to court. It was deemed a ‘civil’ not ‘criminal‘ matter. He is invited to go to court in civil matters not criminal (he has to go to court). In reality it is a criminal matter as many people were injured and died as a result of genetic therapies called vaccines. Gates and Bourla (Pfizer) are among 17 defendants. Among those mentioned in the list is the former Prime Minister of the Netherlands and the current Secretary General NATOMark Rutte, Dutch state as well as a number of Dutch public health officials and journalists. An article including the lawsuit is as follows:
As the above shows there are many many issues here. Given I received emails from PayPal I did due diligence on PayPal and found an interview with journalist Whitney Webb (see below further down). She reveals early founders Elon Musk and Peter Thiel are involved criminal activity, she uses the words Paypal Mafia. That alarms me as a member of the public. Why was I written to? How is my government protecting the public? Data gathering turns into intelligence surveillance which she refers to as an ideology and a goal of Total Information Awareness naming Thiel’s company Palantir. Peter Thiel has been pictured in Israel shaking hands with PM Netanyahu. Their are global concerns of the targeting of innocent people which has been reported by experts as a Palestinian genocide. Data gathering on targeted people or individuals puts their lives at risk. She refers to the CIA. The CIA is a player in data sharing as Julian Assange and Edward Snowden shared with the world raising questions about intelligence agencies and who they serve.
The film Social Dilemma illustrates the problem of our lives been tracked by AI, algorithms and data gathered.
So when you read in privacy statements references to tracking, biometrics, data gathering, contacts it raises concerns for the public, as data is shared and sold to partners who may have nothing to do with business in a ethics free transaction. The Total Information Awareness (TIA) objective is to surveil every single person, which I do not consent to. Total Information Awareness is about control or what the US military call Full Spectrum Dominance. It is not gathering essential data to ensure business operations. TIA is not about predictive policing or stopping crime but to gather data on every human being and then potentially seek to profile, target or criminalise those who don’t comply within the context of democratic societies that have never agreed to communism/fascism ideologies and the use of technology to force agreement as eligibility. How would you feel if it was done to you when falling out of favour? When you live in ivory towers with group think you lose touch with reality outside of your own cohort. This is the real risk. You can data gather but as I know you can’t understand this through analytics, you have to feel it to truly know it.
Australia has just experienced a shooting incident at Bondi which is been compared to Port Arthur shooting in Tasmania. Another police whistle-blower said the accused in Port Arthur was innocent (mental age of 11) and it was a false flag operation (intelligence) indicating government involvement, again without accountability. Any events can be set up, amplified by social media, technology, agendas as innocent people are profiled, blamed, smeared and jailed.
False flags create the appearance of a crisis or trigger crisis. The film Wag the Dog highlights what intelligence can do to distract from other real incidents.
During the Covid-19 pandemic narratives like fake news, disinformation, anti-vaxers, fact checkers countering alternative expert views, QR codes (data gathering), judge only courts, unlawful lockdowns, coercive uptake of genetic therapies, no jab no job, no jab no play, access without warrants, tracking online, endless messaging of a pandemic and alternative voices shutdown, censored, smeared or deaths. This takes us back to a dark age by those who have no concept of love.
Concerns were raised by former NSW police officer Constable Cooney who spoke out as he saw police used to enforce a crime against the people.
If the above doesn’t start go to Bitchute copy heading: AUSTRALIAN POLICE WHISTLEBLOWER NSW SENIOR CONSTABLE COONEY REVEALS WHAT’S HAPPENING AMONG POLICE
The following is the police letter to Commissioner Fuller:
“… Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed……Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28] (Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first)…’
Article 7 of the international convention of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
…Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency be invalid.” [34] With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36]. Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression…”
This last quote your Board should deeply consider:
“…Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence….”
Constable Cooney had to leave the report, he received no support from the Police Commissioner or the Government when acting dutifully to raise concerns of a crime. This is why the public don’t feel safe and many become angry as there are no channels to restore balance (order) and hold parties to account.
Journalist Whitney in her interview refers to the shooting incidents and the profiling of potential shooters and the intention to create an agency with the acronym HARPA (similar to DARPA) as part of Health. She explains AI can be programmed to go through social media accounts and then flag for early warning signs of what they call neuropsychiatric violence and based on a algorithm can send people to a court ordered physician (assessment) or house arrest (lockdown). This is with no evidence of direct involvement. No evidence of a crime. The algorithm she suggests is likely Palantir which contracts to 18 intelligence agencies and corporations (called digital brain) for the National Security State and beyond the US. The problem here is intelligence is not about conflict resolution or investigation (evidence) for problem solving it is about protecting private-public partnerships which these days are controlled by private actors, of which evidence is suggesting, are part of the Global Reset agenda, Digital ID and Crimes Against Humanity. Whitney Webb reports labelling people as subversives. Innocence doesn’t seem to matter, data is used and held without being placed before a judge (Habeus Corpus) or potential to refuse bail using media spin and held for long periods in isolation (cruel and inhumane). This means innocent people can be set up or can suicide before even seeing a judge. She reports government by algorithm. This occurs without independent oversight or separation of powers to ensure justice. This runs counter to liberty, democracy, the rule of law and genuine business transactions without political agendas.
The video on CIA, Ukraine and the PayPal Mafia.
Detailed quote from video: “…Palantir came out PayPal’s anti-fraud algorithm. Around the time post 911 surveillance operation called Total Information Awareness housed at DARPA running into problems to be defunded by Congress. Alex Carp and Peter Thiel went to the people those who run TIA and offered Palantir as a vehicle to privatise TIA. The person connecting them – TIA team with early Palantir people – was Richard Pearl who was a notorious neo-Conservative architect of Iraq war and wrote Clean Break document for Netanyahu when became Prime Minister of Israel telling him their needed to be regime change in Iraq and Syria. TIA continued under Palantir and intimate involvement with the CIA’s In-Q-Tel. CIA guided their product. The goal of TIA surveil absolutely everything about every American and correlate and analyse it algorithmically now AI with the purpose of categorising Americans supposedly with the idea of stopping terrorist attacks before it happens but really it is now it is about stopping crime before it happens or what is now known as predictive policing of which Palantir is a leader of…. controversial for piloting their predictive policing pre-crime programs in low income neighbourhoods… algorithms including Palantir’s are notoriously inaccurate. The one LAPD started using after Palantir called Predpol, found through an investigation to be less than 0.5% accurate in determining who would commit crime or not, it is the ultimate algorithm to prison pipeline for people. You live in the wrong neighbourhood, wrong ethnicity, wrong school or whatever, the algorithm can flag you as your likely commit a crime and sent to jail pre-emptively, disturbing stuff. Palantir the reincarnation of TIA is not only used abroad but its intention is domestic…. Used abroad extensively allegedly leading Army Seals to Osama bin Laden and storied exploits via extensive military contracts aboard… it is important to stress again that it is intended not only for the war on terror but DOMESTIC terror. The infrastructure has been developed by every President since George W Bush and very extensively by Trump Administration… more than any other … most supportive of pre-crime in that period of time. After El Paso Walmart shootings and other spate of mass shootings at that time called on social media to profile users to identify potential shooters before the can shoot… considered creating this entire agency modelled after DARPA called Health ARPA or HARPA, made by Biden…ARPA H the program that Trump wanted to implement through HARPA use AI go through all innocent American social media accounts and then flag Americans for ‘early warning signs’ for neuro-psychiatric violence, based on what the algorithm says send people to a court ordered Physician or house arrest… very problematic the algorithm is Palantir which contracts 18 intelligence agencies, most of the corporate world and Wall Street, it is arguably a digital brain and beyond the US, runs most of our health data. Also true for UK (NHS). Exploit mental health for pre-crime, access to health care data, anything public about you, finances, make it searchable for the national security community. Label people as subversives. It is not a friendly program, not America First, or pro liberty, it is an incarnation of the worst impulses from the Bush-Reagan era, framed as great and efficiency, J D Vance owes his career to Peter Thiel. Going back to the Paypal mafia come out of that Nexus Elon Musk Space X runs space force obviously the Starlinks subsidiaries big part with major military applications…building satellite constellations for intelligence community, won’t say which agencies, presumably CIA.. a lot of national security types…that should be concerning for people worried about mass surveillance. It is not just “I am not doing anything wrong” when you add the element of predictive policing pre-crime all of this is tied to, Trumps willingness to entertain these ideas… it doesn’t matter if you are not doing anything wrong the algorithm thinks you may do something wrong in the future and how do you defend yourself. That is why I am a critic… they are not interested in liberty but government by algorithm. Centralisation of power too, look at Department of Government Efficiency …. reduce workforce framed as cost effective… what is being removed by DOGE but not a lot of interest in what is replacing. It is clear the ambition is to replace them with artificial intelligence… Leads to centralisation of power. Who controls the AI replacing people and influence..? Sam Altman Open AI or Elon Musk X AI company or handful of competitors… small playing field to garner contracts. Those hired at DOGE are connected to Elon Musk or Palantir...”
Chriss, I wish to share with you and the Board my video I felt inspired to make about a poem I wrote regarding the seeds we all plant in 2026. May my video serve you as it was inspired for everyONE. What we ultimately do when we harm others wittingly or unwittingly is we harm ourselves. That is the reality outside of cyber. We have to think deeply about the seeds we plant. My desire is we plant seeds of peace.
I, personally am not against anything or anyone as I see you are me in the context of oneness. Had I walked in your shoes, same influences, I would be similar believing what you believe as ‘the way it is’. We act from what we know. So each of us have, in many respects, need to believe this technocracy is all above board, the future or pushing towards a goal that benefits profit, control or whatever. In truth it will not serve anyone, not PayPal, not the public and not corporations. For myself, I will speak truthfully if I feel my life or any other’s is endangered as a social responsibility and duty. I would do the same for you without hesitation, that is the real order here. It is our nature to care for each other. That is how nature works and thrives.
The world has changed for the public as we no longer feel safe online or dealing with multinational companies who clearly have agenda’s outside of delivering services for the public benefit. We feel stalked and part of a wider genocide which means we are not safe. That is why I don’t want data gathering. I can see those who don’t comply are excluded from the system and profiled as ‘subversives’ when they are just doing what they think is the ‘right’ as a public responsibility.
I ask you to cease and desist and delete all information pertaining to myself that you have gathered or shared.
I do not consent to any company gathering my data, biometrics, profiling or owning my data (records) to justify using ownership as rights.
May this honest blog be of service to you and the team. We all have to walk our path. The good in this is that society has to take responsibility for speaking up(an error not corrected is agreed) and saying no when they realise harm is being done in an environment that is increasingly criminalising ‘no’. I hold particular concerns for young people who tend to not understand the world they are in and will speak up. Young people are being profiled as dangerous in the media, when they are young and innocent. They and the elderly are the most vulnerable.
2026 is going to be a fearful year for everyone as high level crimes are revealed across the world. It would be wise to deeply listen and work on conflict resolution, inner peace and not endless ‘war doctrines’ of risk as business strategy as we are indeed, in this together. There are no winners.
I am a peacemaker and I know everyone gets to choose.
I wrote this poem a few weeks ago and sent it to friends but felt to publish it as the message is for everyONE. What seeds are you planting for 2026 as this will become your future.
What was interesting was I uploaded this video and for some reason it was processed upside down. I became frustrated. Then I laughed at the seed of frustration I planted. I have to learn what I teach.
First Impressions of the Shooting in Bondi, Sydney, Australia
I wish to send my love to all whose lives were affected and changed at Bondi. I send love to the deceased who died on 14 December 2025 as they move in to spirit.
I’ve been spending time looking into the issues so will not be repeating the mainstream narrative until I get clear about what this is really about.
I am a Rotary peace fellow and dedicated to a peaceful world and am aware what we are shown in the media is not often the truth behind the scenes.
What I will say is violence does not solve any problem but just projects pain onto others as a perceived ‘enemy’ masking unresolved conflict in those perpetrating the crime and those who may well be backing the violence for their own agenda’s.
I will go still (peace) on this event and convey what comes to me.
The event motive feels to cause maximum ‘terror‘ by the use of guns in a public space.
It feels to make sure the public feel unsafe in a place that would be considered safe and a central tourist location in Sydney, Australia.
It is also to darken the image of Australia as a safe destination at a holiday time.
It was close to Christmas ruining the joy of Christmas, holidays and family.
It feels planned.
The actors behind this event were strategic. Escalating fear, shutting down freedoms.
We watch violence on television as entertainment and then it asserts itself as a reality for those on the beach at Bondi and those watching. Violence is amplified silently creating distrust between people including the police.
Anti-terrorism laws will be strengthened and under the ASIO Act people can be held without charge.
Australians holding guns will be expected to further disarm.
Links have been made to Port Arthur which is highly controversial as to the alleged gunman was mentally incapable and the event believed a false flag operation.
Why, if the gunman is on a ASIO watch list was he not identified on CCTV cameras (everywhere) given AI and facial recognition immediately detect and triangulate vehicles using Palantir technology? How was it possible the two men to not be noticed?
Why did the commercial media show violent ‘real life violence’ and images of multiple murders repeated over and over without warnings or any sense of responsibility that this deepens the psychological trauma and sense of harm to the public, particularly impacting children who have no filter. Is this in the public interest?
We are witnessing more violence inflicted on western countries in mass shootings, particularly the USA. Then more laws are enacted impacting the people as restrictions, surveillance, intrusive technologies, crowd control (EDW) but not solving the fundamental impulse to use violence as an act causing fear, trauma, reprisals as acts of war impacting the ‘peace’.
The gunmen appear to be military trained in war zones.
Why were the guns (rifles) used and not semi-automatics if this was terrorism? It appears to profile a ‘domestic terrorism’ incident.
Why didn’t anyone see the guns before they were fired?
Why was the gunman’s face uncovered?
When the gunman was disarmed he walked away without a struggle and could be observed to turn his head and back on the one who disarmed him, which appeared strange if he was fearful of being shot and likely military trained?
Why no police drones?
Why no helicopters?
Was the attack on the Jewish community? If so, why not go to a synagogue? Why shoot on a beach publicly? Were there specific targets? Why kill others? A retired policeman was killed.
Was the Rabbi targeted? (Turns out he is into happiness).
There are many, many questions here. I am not watching the mainstream media as a source of truth but looking back in time to see what went wrong in the past and how we continue to sell violence as entertainment but not emotional intelligence as a solution.
The disconnect is this lack of care and empathy for others as the mindsets become indifferent, detached and cold in relation to their impact on others. The depth of hurt, anguish and despair cannot be calculated.
I give deep contemplation to the Palestinians attacked in Gaza and the West Bank and how the two state solution is avoided ensuring tensions and endless inhumanity fed by mindsets who do not know peace.
The United Nations and negotiators have proved ineffective in brokering peace as those in leadership do not choose peace.
The majority of the Australian public do not think in this way. They are in most cases helpful, kind and considerate. However, we are being shut down, people are not learning conflict resolution and we see our families divided and communities becoming a street scape as the internet replaces public space. The issue of public space and over surveillance of our lives is growing and data is monitorised in this drive for totalitarian control which generates more fear, trauma and general unhappiness.
My desire is for the public to take responsibility and start to speak up peacefully, respectfully and with solutions to violence and sponsored terrorism funded by actors who want to disrupt peaceful societies as a means to force change and behaviour to comply with edicts. This will not work as the public will question more and more. Events such as these are going to force the public to investigate what is going on and never weaken to hate or hurt others as all want a peaceful world. That is what makes Australia a great place to live. We are not to let this change us. Remain friendly, fearless and positive as we look for solutions.
I send love to all, particularly those who lost their loved ones. I include the perpetrators and their families as all pay a high price when violence occurs. No winners.
May through this situation real peace and understanding arise to rebalance the insanity of violence and agendas.
I will trust a higher power and look for what comes out of this as we are here to commit to real peace. Nothing else will work. Violence teaches violence.
——————————————————————————————————————–
Important Issues and Discussions Providing Insights into Violence and Unresolved Conflicts
I’ve felt inspired to include the following in the public interest and empowerment.
1) Port Arthur shooting, Tasmania (1996)
Going through my blog I saw links to Port Arthur April 28, 1996 as a false flag incident asserting government involvement.
2) Bondi Stabbing at Westfield, Bondi Junction, Sydney (2024)
On Saturday 13 April 2024, 40-year-old Joel Cauchi stabbed and killed six people and injured a further twelve in the Westfield Bondi Junction shopping centre in the eastern suburbs of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. He targeted women, killing five and wounding twice as many. He attacked two male security guards, killing one. The injured included a nine-month-old girl. Cauchi was later fatally shot by NSW Police Inspector Amy Scott after he ran at her with a knife in hand.
Note: I watched the footage and he seemed to be either drug induced, mind controlled or a mental health issue the way he walked and attacked. It was not normal. The public would need to know what caused his mental state. Where were the security guards?
3) Violent Video Shooting gamesas fun (male violence)
The next blog is on violent video games which programs children to BE ‘shooters’. Why are children being trained to be shooters? As a community why is violent gaming not banned? How many children will play this christmas unaware that gaming is simulated training that the special forces use? For those who scoff at this, I recently heard a 7 year old at a library after playing a violent game turn to another child of the same age and say ‘I will kill you for real’. Children do not normally talk about killing each other when they are playing? Their nature is to share and innocent playing. This is programming violent messages in early childhood which become unconscious bias in adulthood. It underlies indoctrination of the ‘war for boys’ by men believing war is peace.
As a peacemaker I knew it was programming him to solve problems by killing and to obey orders. They turn killing into fun. This turns into indifference when confronted with suffering in real life. To care and think through the implications of a person being killed is ignored. Yet this is vital if we are to understand the ramifications of murder and its impacts on communities. Software developers could create peace games, but there are very few available. They profit from war, that is the bottom line.
Today is the anniversary of the UN Declaration of Human Rights. Life has led me to Stardust. Immediately I felt ‘blocking of the sun’ and Bill Gates came to mind. Vitamin D shield came to mind. Vitamin D is a healer. I often observe the climate, the clouds smearing the sky changing the climate and dropping temperature. I contemplate the minds behind it, who, like children, play with matches to burn the whole earth down. I do not subscribe to climate change arguments. I recognise ecological impacts due to industrial pollutants, chemicals, biotechnology and nuclear testing caused by public-private partnerships, who propose they should be trusted to restore balance. I recognise the geoengineering chemtrails released on uninformed populations and nature – barium, strontium, aluminium and titanium responsible for the industry of disease (inclusive of neurological) which mirrors the dis-ease within the high level planners/investors who refuse to look into their own imbalance unable to see their own projection of denials they believe exist outside them. The word ‘zero point’ just came to me in relation to oxygen. Oxygen is a healer. Is this why we learn of NASA experimenting on anaerobic bacteria (thrives without oxygen) staphylococcus [MRSA]? Self defeating comes to me.
When any actor acts with a malevolent intent, universal lore returns the ‘negativity’ to those sending it out as the real rebalancing. The need for control is the real disease by those who must have outcomes according to plans and are driven by their own reactive fears. We are each here to learn ‘who we are’, and it can be fearful observing activities that assert public benefit but as we saw with Covid-19, it was indeed the opposite, self destructive.
Our world is waking up and miracles do happen (outside of what we think is possible). Nature has its own ability to respond to imbalance by forces that have no idea of homeostasis of the planetary systems. The indigenous had a clearer understanding of their place in nature, not in the dominant position but rather they were subject to natural change more akin to the feminine (receptive). Their honouring of nature came out of their experiences that they are not in control at all. When we work against our true nature, we lose, all ways. The scientists despite their research are not in control or fully aware no matter their funding or belief systems – Stardust, NASA, elite think tanks and data engineers in Silicon Valley whose own industry is polluting the planet with metals contaminants and EMF radiation causing neurological and health impacts together with toxic negative mindsets in denial of their true nature. Life is indeed circular and moves in mysterious ways.
Kevin Shipp (ex CIA) met Dane Wigington and produced his own presentation on the shadow government/Deep State of public-private interests unconstitutionally controlling government without public oversight.
Is this about climate change, reverse terraforming the earth making it uninhabitable for humans, I ponder.
Project Stardust was mentioned in Star Wars – Priming?
So we will observe the outcomes of beliefs not grounded in terrestrial/cosmic/universal reality and see what happens.
Many do not believe love is the source of who we are or see themselves in opposition to it as if a weakness. Yet it is an organising centra pedal (outward) and fugal (inward) force energy which re-formulates life based on unity harmonics, particles/waves, geometric symmetry patterns reforming life in what can be perceived as a dance arriving at equilibrium. Construction and destruction (recycling) is the natural lifecycle in a self organising system that is beyond belief and sensitive to all life. We did not invent love, it was the very spark of life that makes it, gives meaning to it, exploding out from a wordless joy of creative synergistic energy exchange and possibility that is inconceivable to humans separate from the whole. Many are operating out fearful/loveless mind identification unable to feel the wholistic aspects of life of which a sense of connection to something grander and more wonderful. Those unconscious or disconnected will become aware as they experience the outcomes of their plans that ultimately do not serve them as they do not ‘know themselves’ in the sense of Socrates. Mind, body and spirit is the pyramid of balance.
U.S-Israeli geoengineering start-up announces solar experiments from April 2026
Stardust Solutions, the private firm hoping to patent geoengineering technologies, has raised $60 million in funding from investors and is looking to commence ‘solar radiation management’ experiments from next year.
‘Blocking out the sun’. Photo: PSK
Will Stardust be the first to commercialise weather modification?
STARTUP MOVES FORWARD
US-Israeli start-up, Stardust Solutions, plans to begin outdoor experiments of highly controversial solar geoengineering technology from April 2026.
The company is working towards potential full deployment this decade, according to recent news reports and updates to Stardust’s internal website.
This announcement follows the group raising $60 million in financing from a broad coalition of investors, ranging from Silicon Valley venture capitalists, to the largest shareholder in luxury sports car manufacturer Ferrari, and Italian football club Juventus.
This is in addition to $15 million already raised from earlier investors, including controversial Israeli-Canadian venture capital firm, AWZ.
AWZ has been accused of profiting from the Gaza situation and has a partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defense’s Directorate of Defence Research and Development.
We first reported on Stardust Solutions and their plans to develop and commercialise solar geoengineering technology back in March of this year.
Stardust’s CEO, Yanai Yedvab, is a former deputy chief scientist at the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, an agency notorious for overseeing the nation’s covert weapons program.
The company’s chief product officer, Amyad Spector, is another physicist plucked from Israel’s weapons research apparatus.
Since our last piece, the company hired the law firm Holland & Knight in the first quarter of 2025 for lobbying purposes, but the firm didn’t disclose activities “due to a clerical error”.
Solar geoengineering runs counter to a wide range of human rights obligations, including the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, the right to life, the rights of future generations, and the collective and inherent rights of a free society.
A 2023 report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee warned that geoengineering could undermine the rights of billions of people.
“By planning outdoor solar geoengineering experiments as soon as April 2026, openly aiming to commercialise the technology, and raising the prospect of deployment this decade, Stardust and its investors are accelerating a reckless race that threatens to put humanity on a path of no return to perpetual dependency on this extreme technology,” said CIEL Geoengineering Campaign Manager, Mary Church.
“Stardust and its backers cannot be allowed to flout international law by developing and normalizing this extraordinarily dangerous technology.”
Indeed, the mainstream unveiling and commercialisation of weather manipulation is concerning, emerging out of the realm of the hidden, to current scientific discussions.
No longer a ‘conspiracy theory’ to be dismissed, the scientific establishment is openly funding, debating, experimenting and launching geoengineering programs.
The reality, and subsequent dangers, can no longer be ignored.
MAINSTREAM BACKLASH
Cloud seeding and other forms of weather manipulation have been around for decades, however as previously explained, this is a new form of experimentation.
The main difference with “solar radiation management” methods, compared to those already around for decades, is that these experiments need to be ongoingfor at least 100 years to work – and in some cases, even longer.
One hundred years is the minimum for most experiments to cause any impact on solar radiation levels, according to the modelling. In other words, it’s unachievable.
Despite this, however, the mad scientists push on – but not without backlash.
Geoengineering technologies are surfacing new societal tensions and political resistance in the United States in particular, where a pushback is underway to rein in the experiments.
Across the United States, opposition to these interventions is emerging as a potent, cross-cutting force in climate politics, uniting unlikely coalitions of right-wing populists and environmental traditionalists against an increasingly less-relevant technocratic centre.
These technologies have triggered online mobilisation, localised demonstrations, and state-level bans from activist politicians. All of this suggests a politically volatile terrain.
The news of Stardust’s activities comes amid growing political momentum for a Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement.
Countries across Africa, Europe, and the Pacific have signalled their support for a Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement, an initiative already backed by almost 600 multidisciplinary academics and almost 2000 civil society organisations.
African Environment Ministers reaffirmed and elaborated on their call for a Non-Use Agreement at the recent Twentieth Session of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN-20), calling for a UN General Assembly resolution on the matter.
Unfortunately, the calls are misguided – as the United Nations are part of the ‘big club’ pushing for radical climate interventions across the world. It is a narrative they created (warming doomporn), while companies now emerge to offer the ‘solution’.
Stardust Solutions seems like one of the most organised and well-funded private groups to ever emerge in the geoengineering space, and an eye should be kept on them.
They are on track to be what OpenAI and ChatGPT were to the world of AI – and from there, the floodgates will open for a variety of copycat companies to raise funding.
