Part N (2): Susan Carew Submission to OAIC: Commonwealth of Australia listed USA and PM & Cabinet ABN

The video represents a direct response to the Information Commissioner Review.

The relevant systems have turned out to be more to do with information gathering.

Note: relevant systems have turned to be more to do with information gathering.

In relation to the Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023 Susan, as a Commonwealth Officer, she has a query around the Commonwealth of Australia corporation. The government may say this is Disinformation – Susan says for the record that she has never spread information that she know’s to be untrue in order to create a problem (false perception) she cares about people and believes in fairness on all sides. She raises concerns about lose wording of misinformation where a person innocently shares information that an authority can state is false. Most people get facts wrong. You have to study for many years to understand complexity in subject matter. Those putting themselves out there as experts can be involved as vested interests in impressions management. Susan is interested in independent experts with no monetary involvement or conflict with government or using expert (against) to attract people to ensure data gather on persons of interest. Susan is looking for the truth of a matter to make clear decisions and choices as is a natural right. Is Prime Minister & Cabinet legitimate if they have a ABN (Australian Business Number disconnecting the Department as a business from the Commonwealth and the highest law, the Australian Constitution? The Constitution makes it illegal to have any foreign allegiances, corporate, pecuniary (monied) or vested interest in the Commonwealth of Australia government of the people.

The question is the Commonwealth of Australia registered in the USA? Can this be called disinformation or misinformation when the US Security Exchange Commission (stock exchange) has it registered as a corporate entity?

Refer https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000805157&owner=include&count=40

The fact checkers on the internet say this information is false when it is true. Is this disinformation? Will fact checkers come under the Bill? Unlikely as they are outside Australia. What of IT companies policing information? So it appears the Bill focuses on domestic citizens/companies which can halt the flow of information and debate as part of a democracy due to fines/jail? This impacts freedom of expression. Moreover, the Australian Government as a US Corporation ensures the public become assets rather than the sovereign. This means the allegiances change to stakeholders breaching the Constitution. This creates public risk. That is critical for the Office of the Australian Information Commission to investigate and protect the public ie. the Privacy Act 1988, GIPA Act, FOI Act. As a government corporation a FOI request is not going to a legitimate authority e.g. Commonwealth of Australia under the Australian Constitution (1901). This needs to be clarified.

Video link: https://old.bitchute.com/video/UAwbtllVFDj5/