Category Archives: Uncategorized

All World Leaders Should Attend a Blue Eyed Brown Eyed class to Stop Projecting their Prejudices and War Mentality

Leaders have not been trained in anti-bullying or anti-discrimination. They are dividing the world for financial gain and not being subject to consequences to learn empathy. If people do not feel what they subject others to they continue to see objects and nothing wrong in their behaviour.

Jane Elliott was a Southern educator in the United States who brought in experiential teaching. She asks the children questions. She divided them on the basis of brown eyes or blue eyes which is a metaphor for colour prejudice,, but you can put any discrimination in there – could be muslim, could be poverty, could be female, could be non-vaxed. All the same iissue where divisions are amplified by authority and one group pitched against another.

She is an excellent teacher, not she asks questions doesn’t tell them how to think, that is the key feature of a great teacher.

Brotherhood is another prejudice as half the population is not male. This is one of the biggest prejudices known to humanity. The female is not a he, yet the language is masculine. So they come to accept the language but deep within don’t identify. We change this by referring to sisterhood and brotherhood or we are sisters and brothers, not the order. It is very subtle prejudice.

Imagine the Israeli’s go through aerial bombing from Palestinians, what would they say about war? Would they seek to solve the problem. I am sure the public are experiencing great fear due to Iranian bombing. Of course violence is no solution but it continues until we see ourselves in the other.

Judgement is a poison.

The Massive Disconnect to What Makes Us Truly Happy

I sit here watching Long Lost family (ABC TV) and how people react to meeting for the first time after a lifetime of separation. This is about where children have been adopted for a range of reasons. They worry they weren’t loved. The mother’s fret that they will never see their child again. Yet when they see photos and letters they see the immediate family resemblance and cry. The love is so strong and it is spiritual.

I then contemplate the world of men and war and constant disruption for profit and it is seems so out of touch with the human condition as if on a separate planet.

There is no understanding that when we hurt people through business or personal issues that it matters. There appears no real understanding of when cities are bombed, like Kiev (Ukraine) and Gaza strip in Palestine. The cameras capture blown out buildings as if somehow normalised when it is man’s inhumanity against families. I can’t understand the disconnect and coldness around harming and killing people. How is it possible to not feel for people? To not see your own family in their family, how you would feel if someone bombed your home?

I see the money that is spent on Defence but not welfare, as if the latter is ‘useless eaters’ who make no money as the financiers dominate the realm of value, yet they understanding nothing of true human value that has no price tag.

I am glad I was born a woman and feel my feelings, cry in compassion, look around at my community with love in my eyes, even as they look at iPhones and connect less and less, I know they have been disconnected. Fortunately I’ve lived a full life, travelled the world and worked in lots and lots of places. I’ve met so many people from all walks of life and found myself better off for the connections.

So when I see a New World Order by those who think money is superiority, I just look at that unable to understand how they can’t see the beauty.

There is another program where people play piano, they come from all walks of life. The truth is there is so much potential in people, so many gifts, so many abilities that are not given full empowerment too. All my life, even as a child, I saw the potential in people. I’ve been amazed how incredible all people are. Yet it gets tainted by discrimination, tainted by class, tainted by income inequality or whether you live in a home or not. I see so many trivial divisions that lead some to despair and drugs or alcohol to cope with life.

Our schools whilst staffed by amazing teachers, our system does not develop our personal talents but tend to force people into sameness learning things that don’t inspire. Education becomes a chore rather than an uplifting inquiry.

When I taught as a clown the kids were all engaged, they laughed a lot, played, learned, critically enquired and never forget the peace clown. No child could get in wrong in my class, they could only enjoy the class and play with the clown. It so worked, it was a wonderful experience for me and the kids. Yet the schools didn’t support me in continuing so unfortunately REAL HOPES was a temporary phenomena when it had the potential to really educate kids in emotional intelligence which is what solves the endless bullying and conflict so many other invest in as a means of control.

I see our world as so immature, particularly the males who don’t seem to get the importance of learning how to communicate feelings, to learn to really listen and to value gentleness, kindness and wisdom. This is not to say there are not men that do feel this, they are out there, but very rare. The same applies to women to stop controlling, learn to lighten up, really accept others for who they are and maybe work out a team plan to raise kids in ways that are fun, positive and not exhausting. So much both have to learn if children are to not go through all the drama, unhappiness, broken relationships, drugs and so on. Too many influences breaking families, teaching abuse via actions, not feeling sensitive to how others feel and working towards the highest good for all. As people do this it comes back to them via life in some way. Life is always mirroring what you send out. So few understand ‘what you think about you bring about’, ‘you see as you are not as others are’ and negativity is the body’s message that you are not aligned with inner truth. What people do is rather than look into what we think, we blame others and hold grudges as they made you feel x,y,z. When in truth you chose thoughts that made you feel what you felt.

No-one can impact your feelings unless you agree on some level. When we believe the world is what television tells us we are listening to other voices. When we look outside our own window we realise this is our world.

No-one knows the world, no matter our research we only see fragments. Even owning Twitter now X, the programmers can’t know the whole. What I do know is that people are intrinsically good but can be influenced by other voices when constantly exposed to the ideas.

We are here to learn to remember ourselves. To find quiet and really explore what makes us truly happy. It is our nature to be happy not anxious. Fear is false evidence appearing real. In truth we live in a loving universe that simply mirrors to us our own beliefs. Until we question beliefs we can be controlled by unquestioned beliefs which can leave us with low levels of unhappiness and then this is transferred to others via irritation, anger, conflict and separation.

So the place to find peace in this world, is within ourselves. It is a truism that ‘the truth sets you free’ from misery. Truth arises joy when it is genuinely true. If it makes you unhappy then there is something you do not know about life, the knowing of which changes everything.

I send love, peace, joy to the world I imagine out there. I encourage people to question negative thoughts (see www.thework.com) and to resolve conflicts to enable negativity to release and grow as a person. May you come to accept who you are and know you are perfectly imperfect. There are no people who are a waste of space, none that don’t deserve to live, and no mistakes in life. All comes for us not against us, no matter how it seems.

I feel no enemy, no matter critiques, I feel no-one I hate as I would be the same if I was them with the same influences, and a belief that for some reason we have to take the journey we take for the highest good.

We are all here to re-member who we are.

In the End there is only beauty.

When we reconnect joy arises as this is the purpose of life. We are indeed all ONE.

May you be happy.

Does Australia Need to Build US/UK Nuclear Submarines?

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/the-cost-of-the-aukus-nuclear-submarine-deal-has-been-revealed/ezt8260hs

Extracts:

According to a government source, the submarine deal between Australia, the US and the UK is expected to cost between $268 billion and $368 billion.

Note: Australia is not paid $368 billion, it costs us. This is beneficial to US and UK.

The program is expected to cost Australian taxpayers between $268 billion and $368 billion by the mid-2050s. That figure includes an estimate of the construction and sustainment of the boats and all associated costs, including investing in capability in the US and UK.

Up to eight new Australian-made AUKUS class conventionally armed but nuclear-powered submarines will roll off the production line from the early 2040s.

They will be equipped with the US vertical launch system. It’s envisaged one would be produced every three years.

Another amazing fact here is the US Review of Australia building subs and their ‘US First’ strategy, translates into a deal favouring them not Australia. The concern is they don’t think Australia is capable of manufacturing the subs. 7.30 Report tonight are saying Australian workers are at Pearl Harbour skilling them in building subs. The deal is to increasing defence spending up to $10’s billions per year. Malcolm Turnbull supports submarines as security and no submarines is a bad deal he says. In reality we are not going to be saved by the US, although they will protect their assets in Australia. Why would Australia want to service US nuclear subs in Perth? That reminds me of the nuclear ships argument that NZ’s Prime Minister David Lange years ago created a nuclear free NZ banning a nuclear armed warships. Refer: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-real-story-of-accidental-hero-david-lange-and-how-new-zealand-became-nuclear-free/DJV4RDZSNCKSWQWJOQ5XUINIRY/

So more of our taxes are expected to be directed to Defence, it is not about threats to Australia, it is about using Australia and it appears the AUKUS alliance is drawing funds from the Australian military to pay for US subs. That would be in reality a draining of our defence spending, weakening the country. It is the biggest defence spending in peace time for Australia according to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles. So it raises questions do we want them in an alliance, particularly given the corruption, funding of terrorism, 911 as an inside job, and the profiteering from war which has been privatised. No longer is war defence but has become about business interests called economic interests. We saw this in Iraq with Halliburton and other defence contractors operating as militia. Australia even has a Defence Industries Minister, Pat Conroy, where the industries are predominantly US and British, for example Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Leidos, GS4, Aegis Defence Systems, BAE systems. I recall shaking my head that foreigners had their own Australian minister. To justify defence spending there must be a threat. China is used as a ‘threat’ when in reality China was invited into the World Trade Organisation by Clinton and technology transfer occurred as their industrial base deindustrialised western countries. China are active partners in Covid-19 locking down their cities, QR codes and social credit systems – all part of totalitarian infrastructure. So who is who in zoo? Are they all in it together?

The irony is we Australians are poorer (not unlike homeless) and a much smaller population and the US are richer, yet the expectation is we build USA economic growth and power, at the expense of our Australian. Sound like a good deal? Another pink elephant no-one will talk about is reparations for the Covid-19 bioweapon largely produced by US Defence (DARPA), where Australians have become sick and died and our taxes (up to $1 billion) spent on infrastructure and edicts that were planned by foreign countries, including the US, impacting the health and safety of Australians. Their corporations have not acted like friends but some of the multinationals enemies of the people. This is due to issues of trace metals in foods, slow poisoning, migrant labour, market concentration ensuring costs are lower than medium sized Australian businesses who end up going out of business.

The media silo’s the big picture, not connecting the dots, yet the reality of those driving all these deals care nothing for the people. This is born out by the recent US raids by military and police on undocumented migrants living in the US, to be treated as enemies of the state. We the people are witnessing our governments attacking us and making visible that they are attacking us – police brutality, Covid lockdowns and weather weapons. So how does security increase through deals when human life is clearly devalued and treated as expendable for an unaccountable foreign elite. So whose security is being protected in the name of taxpayer funding?

This link overviews the America First priorities which holds the world to ransom as we saw with US tariffs impacting stock markets. Trump is behaving as a dictator, business man getting better yields for the chosen few, and no friend to anyone as he seeks to extend his power as US power. Readers may recall he was the one who signed off on Operation Warp Speed with Glaxosmithkline (formerly Wellcome) whilst at the same time singing the praises of Hydroxychloroquine. He played both sides. He is sinking the US as a global power to enable a transfer of global power to China. That is why China was able to circumvent Australia, enter Sydney Harbour without notice and with no repercussions. US approved.

https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/aukus-deal-under-review-us-to-reassess-submarine-pact-with-australia-and-uk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellcome_Trust

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Warp_Speed

The United States has launched a formal review of the AUKUS submarine pact with Australia and the United Kingdom, to determine whether it aligns with the Trump administration’s “America First” priorities, according to a US defence official cited by the BBC.

A senior Pentagon official said the review is being undertaken “as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President’s America First agenda,” reported Indian Express.

The review is being led by Elbridge Colby, a senior official at the Department of Defence and a noted critic of the agreement, who has previously questioned the logic of sharing what he called the “crown jewel” of US military technology amid rising global tensions.

Australia has responded to the review with confidence.

Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles told ABC Radio Melbourne that the AUKUS pact is vital to Australia’s long-term security.

I’m very confident this is going to happen,” he said.

As an homeless person for 8 years now I see no value in building submarines. I see it as further indebting this country to foreign powers. Taxes should be spent at home on services that needed. If you want to ensure security train children in conflict resolution, stop selling violent video games, and teach men that real security is to ‘know thyself’, to not use violence but to build a real national culture that extends friendship. That is the strength of this nation, we are friendly and would be very unwise to join the nuclear arms race (nuclear subs) which ultimately harms other humans. This doesn’t create world peace but more insecurity as they rob the poor to pay the rich.

That is my take on this.

Did Monash IVF make a Mistake with Embryo or Were they Experimenting?

Monash is connected with the Global Reset and genetic engineering. I find it very disturbing for women undergoing IVF to find they are birthing another woman’s child. It is alleged that two embryo’s were planted into the wrong women, I find that hard to believe. It appears experimental to me given Monash’s links to biotechnology and big pharma.

The CEO resigned I am watching on television as I write this.

https://7news.com.au/news/monash-ivf-implants-implants-wrong-embryo-in-the-second-mix-up-in-months-c-18981245

Victoria has been harvesting eggs from young women since 2019 under the guise of egg storage so women have eggs later on when they want a baby. At the time this was happening I wondered about cloning of women’s eggs. Women don’t need to store eggs as they make their own. The only area where this holds is infertility, which I experienced via the Pill, one of my ovary’s became very painful and half was removed. We are seeing infertility rising around the world and it is in my view connected to medical interventions and vaccinations. This is another form of violence against women under the justification of depopulation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36670107/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14636770701843600#d1e81

https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/as-made/acts/prohibition-human-cloning-reproduction-act-2008

They are not allowed to clone humans but they have cloned so many species, there is no reason why humans are not being cloned. We see future visions of cloned humans who are transhumanised. The idea here is ownership of the embryo, so it has to be changed and cloned.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/more-young-women-freeze-eggs-with-a-view-to-post-pandemic-parenthood-20210706-p587bg.html

The clones in virology apparently can wipe out the original. So it is not just a question of ethics, it is another front of depopulation of females. There is evidence of overpopulation being linked to female mosquitoes. Research at Pirbright was genetically modifying female mosquitoes with the objective of reducing population.

Mosquitoes are being gene edited to be resistant to disease which likely has huge implications in nature.

https://www.pirbright.ac.uk/publications/aedes-aegypti-aag2-derived-clonal-mosquito-cell-lines-reveal-effects-pre-existing

Assange, McBride and Fiona Barnett Whistle-blowers Reveal Truth to be Criminalised or Stonewalled

I often feel inspired to just simply look at someone without any real sense of knowing why. I found myself contemplating who are ethical journalists? For some reason Fiona Barnett comes to me and I then find Media Watch critique of Paul Barry of a ritual abuse victim discrediting her story. I marvelled at his smile unable to emotionally connect to her suffering as he had his own motive of shutting down news in the public interest. He retired in 2024, the question is who put him in that position? Two links of interest:

https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/approach-some-claims-with-caution/9973098

https://pennybutler.com/tag/cia/

I looked over this blog at who is visiting I often get intelligence visiting from US, China, Europe, or satellite (no country) and they may come and scoop up information in the information war seeking enemies rather than truth in their world of ‘self interest’ not ‘best interest’. I saw my blog on David McBride and recognise that I focused before on the war crimes of Australian soldiers which linked to the AFP raid and my own decision to visit the Senate inquiry as the only member of the public listening to intelligence, police and others give testimony to the Inquiry into the impact of the exercise of law enforcement and intelligence powers on the freedom of the press. This was the 4 July 2019 the very day I published on my blog my own declaration of independence. What I learned was where the line is being re-drawn in national security matters and media freedom.

Today of course I know there are crimes against humanity happening at the highest levels and this explains why we have a surveillance state, why we see democracy being dismantled, foreign actors in our country and regime change subtly occurring in the name of efficiency when it is about this New World Order control.

So my perception expands with the latest link to David McBride, the lawyer jailed for over 5 years (same as Assange) for releasing classified material (national security) and his attempt to stop over exposure of soldiers war crimes. Now for me at the time I had concerns of blooding Australian soldiers on innocent Afghan’s who have been used and abused by US/Russian interference and the US leaving an extremist government (Taliban) in power as they left them too it. I say in light of US military visually clashing with US migrants in Los Angeles. The idea of creating incidents where people see military enforcement not police enforcement typically of totalitarian regimes as they remove the right to freedom of protest a cornerstone of Us Freedoms. We saw the same military presence during Covid-19 as an illegal permit system was set up to cross borders here. It was an intimidation tactic and based on a alleged pandemic with a 0.004 death rate (risk). Clearly it was spending public money to exercise totalitarian control and gain QR code data for intelligence not informing anyone the QR data is accessible by telecommunications companies, notably Optus sold to Singtel (Singapore Telecommunications) with the highest shareholder is Temasek Pty Ltd. The investors are major players globally financing the world for a New World Order. No mention by AFP or ASIO yet pressure on the media to check with them first when there are real questions about foreign interventions in this country.

https://www.temasek.com.sg/en/our-investments/investment-approach

https://www.investing.com/equities/singapore-telecommunications-ownership

The Financial Review state: “The future of Singtel’s Optus business will be decided by some of the most powerful people in Singapore as it considers selling off part of the Australian telecommunications group in a move that would boost financial returns for its sovereign backer. Singtel vowed to “explore all options to maximise shareholder value” for its Australian subsidiary after The Australian Financial Review reported it was in talks to offload the telecommunications group to Canadian investor Brookfield, which narrowly missed out on buying Origin Energy last year…”

This means that Australian telecommunications data his held by a foreign power. This is a major breach of national security where no arrests were made here in Australia.

Singapore, like Hong Kong was set up by the British. It is a Technocracy having lost its real cultural lifestyle. Clearly foreign actors have invested in Singapore as a alleged democracy with its political parties described as ‘one party’ yet with a Westminster system.

This video re: CFR is part of this flow where the Singaporean Prime Minister is interviewed by the Council on Foreign Relations who are part of this global architecture running the world. The Singaporean Prime Minister is speaking from the perspective of this group and Asia Pacific of which Australia is part. I note his desire for face to face communications in a growing virtual world that will remove human contact and ensure all are trackable. So his heart says face to face but his head says be practical and belong to the bigger group who will save us. Will they?

He discusses security issues and in particular, nuclear which he sees as recalibrations and concerns who comes to your ‘help’. Like many men he speaks of structures, strategy to create deterrence as pathways to avoid conflict. He doesn’t mention depopulation, the privatisation of war and the profits made by disaster capitalism which are the real topics not on the table. The Singaporean Prime Minister makes clear economic interdependence and is where they compromise. Singapore orients to globalisation. China holds non-interference high he says, yet there is interfering in Australia. So until countries honour and internalise their values they can’t expect sovereign integrity. He speaks of win/win, medium term collaboration using publicly listed companies who are in the game to make money whilst the public experience rising prices, technocracy replacing people, AI and automation replacing humans and investor driven demand fuelled by superannuation. The breakdown of societies due to telecommunications, technology, violent media, loss of values and disempowerment to ensure a future of slavery within this New World Order. Greed is the driver for collaboration, yet it is a lose/lose ultimately as investor economics doesn’t respond to real demand but shape changes the world in its image. It’s image is totalitarian control. Control is the core problem coming from ego which is to fulfill needs as many are empty as they have not felt the love from parents, communities and seen themselves as serving the greater family without monetorisation.

The pathological mindset so clearly evident today cares nothing for human beings. It is self interested and driven by gratifying own needs. The narcissistic mindset that doesn’t feeling empathy but sees himself as a emperor demanding respect but not earning it. This detachment objectivised mind has no idea of the deeper human connectivity no AI can replicate. This type of mind is rewarded and promoted. Without ethics and real relationships deals fail, real needs are ignored, and others become the enemy if they disagree. So I see escalation of disorder as no-one has learned the lessons from his-story.

They do not know how to step out of the box of strategic thinking as if the world is a chess game rather than a living breathing system of free dominion. Ownership has embedded beliefs of entitlement and right to rule through success in business which is a man’s game. A women’s worldview is family centric and builds relationships as war is a weakness based on violence and fear to control others rather than earning respect. The patriarchy is very strong in Asia where women have been largely kept in inferior positions no matter their profiles. The more affluent countries become the more unhappy they become as life becomes work and not purpose. We never evolve past these limited mindsets when the potential for growth is infinite when we overcome fear and deception.

So back to David McBride it appears he has been targeted to send a message to anyone deciding to make public classified information when those housing this information require an inquiry into how they assess national security when the country has been massively infiltrated by the Information Technology, investors, real estate and the privatisation of essential services which are operated by corporations with foreign investors. Public listing the country in Washington D.C. has meant that all assets come under a corporatocracy in the UNITED STATES as a corporate entity. So the country has already been taken over, how can files on Australian soldiers be a big security issues when we have our soldiers are supposed to uphold human rights and not engage in summary executions. Australian soldiers are considered some of the most professional, I’ve met a few and they feel pride in high standards. So when they are exposed as nothing more than assassins this impacts perceptions of Australian defence it can give licence to reforms, cuts etc.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-28/david-mcbride-loses-appeal-sentence-severity-whistleblower/105346812

My video on David McBride where I was trying to understand this case.

My blog has a few links which raise further questions. For example, should intelligence use data gained through torture? So they can go and get data, violent human rights, use violence and that is not a crime because they have protection but a lawyer revealing crime loses whistle-blower protection. That is how crazy all this has become. Intelligence are way too protected in the name of national security which is economic security, when we are “national” security (sovereignty) and being violated left, right and centre. Those who whistleblow in the public interest are enemies of the State – the question here is which State or entity do they refer to?

Why? Because they are engaged in active covert operations as part of the Global Reset and our country is clearly controlled by US, UK and I’d say China given the unannounced incursions into Sydney Harbour (2017, 2020) and the recent live fire and circumventing the country without Defence knowledge. This is part of a Communist ‘one world order’ which will be disbanded (the communist part) at a later date. Communism is totalitarian and they need to install this mindset (command and control) to form this New World Order which promises total power and riches which only those bloodlines who see themselves as superior and chosen will in the end be in control of. Many are used to reach objectives.

What I’ve realised tonight is what happened to David McBride and Julian Assange is the exact same tactic– they and others (including journalists) are warned not to reveal military/government secrets. If you do, you go to jail for 5 years (standard rule of thumb). There are legal reasons why Julian and David McBride had to plead guilty, it is to do with being stuck in the system, they have to say guilty (clearly not justice). This is about threats, bullying, suppression and using the judicial system or military courts to lock up those working for the public good. Yet not only are they working for the public, or honouring oaths, they are assisting the public in empowering them to know what harms are happening in their name, the unlawful use of taxpayers funds and committing treason. Yet the problem the whistle-blower has is they don’t have the government or community groups protecting them, they are often alone, low in resources, under enormous personal pressure and faced with a compliant uninformed public without time to investigate the truth of matters and lend support. This leaves many of the bravest people vulnerable to those who have the resources to cause harm and make it look like they are guilty when they are not. Some links:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/10/1/wikileaks-founder-assange-says-pleaded-guilty-to-journalism-to-be-freed

In the course of my own research into my blog I found the video below. What is fascinating about this video is the sensitivity around an issue raised by Senator Rex of a relationship between a senior and junior officer. Senator Payne jumped in and even Senator Kitching is applying the rules of Senate Estimates, to warn Senator Rex not to go into sensitive areas. Yet as a member of the public I hear censorship and wonder why? Why is a naval officers relationship with another officer (junior) a problem? Why make a big deal out of it? Unless there is an issue here being concealed?

Senator Rex lets Vice Admiral Ray Griggs name slip, he is Chief of the Defence force. Some background on the Naval officer Grigg, he was Vice Chief of the Defence Force, he has Order of Australia amongst other ‘Orders’ and notably was trained in Washington D.C. – that I find particularly interesting given the listing in 2009 of THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA in Washington D.C. Securities Exchange Commission changing the status of a nation to a corporate state with stakeholders operating under maritime law. We are coming under military control appears the reality.

It is very hard for the public to understand what is going on without knowledge. So why a media blackout on the Chief of Defence’s decision to marry a woman?

Blackout on chief’s love split

Defence is refusing to make public a 271-page investigative report examining events associated with a change in the marital status of Australia’s second highest ranked military officer. Vice Admiral Ray Griggs, the Deputy Chief of Defence, separated from his wife Kerrie several years ago and in 2016 married a fellow naval officer, Chloe Wootten. Commander Wootten is the current director of communications and media for the navy. In 2014 she was a lieutenant commander and in 2015 she was promoted to commander, according to navy publications.

Navy insiders have revealed to this webpage that members of the Chief of Navy’s office believed the former Chief of Navy and current Vice Chief of Defence Force, Ray Griggs, was involved in an affair as early as October 2013, 12 months before this relationship was declared.

“These sources have also informed this website that Vice Admiral Griggs was in personal contact with Chloe Wootten (then a Lieutenant Commander) in early 2014 to ‘sort out’ her relocation from HMAS Cresswell at Jervis Bay to Canberra. At the time Chloe Wootten was a reservist on a full time contract and was married to a Navy Petty Officer. It is highly unusual for a service chief to become personally involved in the posting arrangements for an officer of this rank. According to the article below: “Griggs advised the Chief of Defence Force in October 2014 that he was in a relationship with Wootten and she has since become his fourth wife. As Vice Chief of the Defence Force, Griggs is responsible for Joint Public Affairs while his new wife holds the position of Director of Communications and Media for the Navy. Defence denies that there is, or ever has been, a conflict of interest.

She was a reservist… then “…Chloe Wootten received two promotions in three years and nine months years. A Navy spokesperson has previously informed this webpage that the minimum time required for promotion from Lieutenant Commander to Commander is four years. A search of the public biographies on the Navy website shows that the usual time for such a promotion is six to ten years

Navy has also reviewed the decision-making process for the promotion of Commander Chloe Griggs and found that it was merit-based and complied with Navy promotion policies. To suggest otherwise is wrong.

IS IT? Maybe Senator Rex was seeking to bring this out.

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Ray_Griggs

Below is extracts from a 2025 Transcript, how did a Naval Officer get into senior leadership positions in the Australian Public Service particularly accessing the most vulnerable.  War is about ‘killing’ as I was told by a former Pentagon military physician, it is in reality the most vulnerable who die.  We only need look at Palestine (overtime), Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Ukraine.  Without doubt 90% of fatalities are the people. So to have a command and control leader inserted into sensitive portfolio’s should raise questions in the parliament.  I will look.  We had a senior Signals Directorate Leaders takeover Centrelink.    Her name was Rebecca Skinner. So the picture of defence entering the government should raise alarm bells.  It didn’t because of the cover of Covid-19 which we discovered was a bioweapon working against the people.  I have to speak truthfully here as its like the Emperors New Clothes, everyone avoids what they fear.  Yes it could be problematic for me, but I just think of the Australians who are sick and dying and it inspires me to use my freedom of speech.  Sometimes you have to say what you know to be true.  The rest is bullying.

‘I am the luckiest public servant alive’: Rebecca Skinner on being a glass-half-full leader

Rays-Griggs-Valedictory-Transcript

This is the drama, seems nothing on the surface. Yet in 2025, the Institute of Public Administration interviews Ray Grigg in VALEDICTORY: RAY GRIGGS AO CSC.

Notable extract: “…. I worked in an organisation where it was illegal to be gay and were gay members of the ADF were effectively hounded, pursued, and expelled

In this discussion he talks about being gay being illegal, yet everyone knows homosexuality was common in the military, many jokes around it. So informally it was accepted. I find it noteworthy that he gave attention to it raising the question was he gay? His wording suggests so. Is that a problem, not in of itself, but from within the context of 4 marriages and acceleration of female careers when no real merit or qualifications is apparent and in a shorter length of time than normal, it raises questions in my mind of potential infiltration and possible nepotism. An extract is below:

2025:

It is a great honour for me to be able to introduce Ray. I have, I feel, an affinity with Ray for a whole range of reasons, but particularly because he and I were appointed and started as secretaries on the same day back in 2021. So, I’m going to embarrass him with just a little bit of a rundown of his incredibly extensive career. He started as a secretary of the Department of Social Services on 22 July 2021. He was responsible for policy and program delivery in the areas of families and children, housing support, social security, seniors, communities and vulnerable people, and ending gender based violence and disability and carers. Ray is also the chair of the Australian Public Service or was the chair of the Australian Public Service Disability Champions Network. Ray was previously the inaugural CEO of the National Indigenous Australians Agency with responsibility for leading policy, program, and delivery reform in line with the government’s commitment to improving the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Prior to this, Ray was the associate secretary of the Indigenous Affairs Group within the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. And before joining the Australian Public Service, Ray spent four decades in the Royal Australian Navy, including a range of command and operational roles, and ending his time in the ADF as the vice chief of the Defence Force. He’s an officer in the Order of Australia and has been awarded the Conspicuous Service Cross, a commendation for distinguished service, and holds awards from the governments of France, Singapore, the Philippines, Indonesia, Spain, and the United States of America. I feel incredibly inadequate. Ray has a reputation for integrity, plain and direct speaking, for tackling hard issues and delivering reform, and most importantly, outcomes. He’s been a strong and frank voice at the Secretaries Board and a great colleague to myself and many others across the service and across the ADF.

Up front, I want to make the point that tonight I’m really talking about my observations over the last 13 and a half years at agency head level. I’m trying to aggregate and pick out some generalities, lest I’d be selectively quoted. Just wanted that disclaimer there. I started my journey in public service when I was in my last year of school in Adelaide in 1978 when I joined the Naval Reserve. It was certainly a different world. I’m not going to labour it too much, as you’ve all heard many variations on the back in the day spiel. But what dominated the first decade of my working life was of course Cold War. You can Google that if you don’t know that, remembering that the end of the Vietnam conflict, which you can also Google, was as close to me at that point as the start of the COVID pandemic was to us now. So just trying to situate that. Email in the work environment was thankfully 15 years away. I worked in an organisation where it was illegal to be gay and were gay members of the ADF were effectively hounded, pursued, and expelled. It was to be a decade before the organisation really had to grapple with women at sea and frankly did it quite badly. And for a long time, you could generally get to the bottom of an issue by picking up a file and going through and understanding a story….

Three years later when you got one of those PM phone calls that you really can’t say no to, I thought how useful it had been not having been chasing that secretary path and just getting on with running the NIAA, which t’s a job that I still think is one of the toughest at the Commonwealth level. Of course, not everyone was pleased that I’d got the DSS role. One former secretary whom I never met wrote, and I quote, “DSS does not need a former Navy admiral (Ray Griggs) as its secretary. It does not need to consolidate the command-and-control culture that seems to have developed there in recent years. On the contrary, it needs to foster a culture where different views are encouraged, information is shared, evidence is valued, and external engagement is promoted.” No preconceived notions or stereotypical pigeonholing going on here. The comment was one of a number swirling around in what I thought was a somewhat hysterical militarization of the APS debate that was running at the time. My personal view is that as a nation, we waste the talent of our former senior ADF and AFP officers frankly. Sadly, to many of them, the very notion of a post-ADF APS career would be as far down their list of things that they want to do as possible, well after golf. Personally, I think that’s a bit of a tragedy and it’s something that does need to shift. And now I must add for context that none of my secretary colleagues shared that view. Well, not to me anyway … “

So I didn’t know my blog on Lawyer David McBride would lead me here. I feel some confusion as he asserts he didn’t want over-exposure of soldiers and sought out whistle-blower protection, yet he was jailed (5 years) for leaking classified information. Then we have other journalists Chris Masters and Nick McKenzie who exposed the Afghan Files using the information leaked by David McBride and then successfully fighting a defamation battle against the SAS solder Roberts-Smith.

An extract from The Daily Mail (Murdoch Press):

“McKenzie said Thursday was ‘a day of justice’ for Mr Roberts-Smith’s former SAS comrades who came forward to give evidence against him.  ‘These brave men of the SAS stood up and told the truth,’ he said.  ‘They told the truth that Ben Roberts-Smith was a war criminal, a bully, and a liar. Australia should be proud of those men.’ McKenzie’s colleague Chris Masters – who co-wrote the stories about Mr Roberts-Smith – said the result was a relief but ‘I don’t people to think of this as a bad day for Australian soldiers’…”

What I am learning is things can appear one way on the surface, we all nod our heads, or scowl with disgust unaware there are deeper agenda’s going on. The nature of propaganda is such that it seems real. It seems plausible and others (mouthpieces) agree, so must be true. It is not like an academic study where you evaluate all sides and find evidence. The public believe opinion leaders, hence the concentration of ownership in the media.

As we saw with Covid the Murdoch Press played the opposition, other media played pro vaccines. The above appears the same. How does this all flush out – maybe it is a warning to SAS that they may be outed for war crimes if they speak out. It increasingly feels like military threats. All soldiers killing civilians are trained to murder. The Afghan’s are not military trained although the Northern Alliance fought back the Russians. Always the civilians were attacked or dying. The women had to deal with extremist Taliban who were reported to have visited Texas over oil. They were known to the Bush administration. The Taliban were actually the orphan children in the madrassas in Northern Pakistan, who were educated in the Koran, taught in Arabic not pharisee (their language), brainwashed. So extremists were created due to warfare. There was no heroism in this war only massive suffering for the public given deaths and sophisticated warfare. The Afghan’s were taught how to US stingers by US intelligence (see Charlie Wilsons War). There is a powerful scene of Charlie and Gust talking with Sve who Charlie is supported by in Israel.

What the public learns is Israel was working with Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, US and Afghanistan. Gust reveals the sex scandal on the one hand and on the other hand parka battle carrier. He speaks about the love of Christ and shooting down helicopters. It is all about business interests, not human interest as our value plumets justified by overpopulation narratives that are not true. Just talked until the lie becomes the truth.

So I sit with this reflecting on discrediting the Australian Military.

The memory of Chinese warships entering Sydney Harbour without Premier Berejiklian knowing. It was evident that there were Chinese waiting at Garden Island navel base and boarded the vessel. Was this a takeover? It was of great concern that this was the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. A clear statement of putting down democracy. Apparently they came in 2017, this is a important year as the Global Reset was being actioned.

In 2025 3 ships carried out live fire exercises 640km from the coast. A Virgin pilot warned the country. PM Albanese said it compared to Australian ships in Taiwan, sounding like he defended the Chinese??

The 3 ships circumvented Australia without Defence knowledge. Someone letting them know they can take down defences. We have specific defence personnel entering the Government, well trained in command and control, placed in the most vulnerable portfolio’s, raises concern in me.

I will put links to warships here. I note the ABC is no longer public, but private so when I look at information I am always aware of bias.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/sydney-news-chinese-war-ships-in-harbour/a66d4cda-218d-45d2-ab26-c2f5259b3f0b

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-27/questions-about-defence-response-to-chinese-warships/104988290

Now I don’t know who Frontline is, but likely high level connections. However, what I did find was a video – did make me laugh – however, I will speak in the Australian vernacular and call it for what is – bullshit. The commentator is American who have equal control over the Australian military (let’s get real), that was mentioned by a Defence leaders in the Senate. He used a word that meant ‘two masters’. This video provides insight into the fact the US have given it thought. So watch it first then I will give my view whilst I am still free to do it.

Note they see Australia as about beers, untrue. You hardly see deadly animals and most would jump up and down seeing a snake. He is saying it can’t be invaded, it has been invaded (more later). I laugh at the US soldiers landing on the beach disrupting sunbaking. Australia is not far from the Pacific islands. The continent is environment. However, if they get a caravan they can enjoy the Nullabor. Yes watch out for the locals, you will get an earfull, maybe Mad Max feral fighters. Maybe chuck a croc at you. Just don’t limit the supply of fear, drugs and cafes. Hey we are not that small militaristically speaking – we have a $368 billion sub deal? That will be handy in the interior. AUKUS and intelligence sharing and QUAD will save us so the yanks say. They talk up Australian surveillance, yet the chinese went around the country with no notification, they entered Sydney Harbour, all good, no-one knew. Live fire 640km offshore, no worries, no detection. Chinese investing in Real Estate – nee hah. I think it would be easy to take the country. Australians are too busy to notice. Australians are submissive, most are too scared to face the Covid reality and many desperately want normality and worry about losing wealth. I am laughing a lot at this video. Particularly the agro where Australians get nasty. There is some truth there. Seeing it through American eyes is funny. There is only 28 million, so they are not going to invade militarily in overt operations. I laugh as Trump will send in help but at a high price that will ensure a transfer of resources to make America Great Again. Australia has to pay for the help! We’re broke! Just give us the land. I needed that laugh…. now to heavy stuff….

They have already taken over the country done it through secret societies, ritual abuse/trafficking, finance, privatisation, migration, real estate ownership, smart metres, councils, the Global Reset etc. Covid-19 was a military operation designed to enforce totalitarian edicts on the public to teach them to obey ‘keeping others safe’ as they injected us with mRNA’s which we know today are bioweapons. This was deadly and cruel. US, Chinese, Russian, European, British and many more pharmaceutical companies brought into these “shots” with nano technology and at the same time made sure 5G was rolled out.

5G is weaponised technology which is directed energy weapons. This technology is dangerous to humans and the environment (pollution). It causes catastrophic increase in illness. Microwaves impact health. The SMART narrative means Secret Militarised Armaments in Residential Areas as part of SMART Cities. Makes clear this is about global control and slavery.

So my last feeling to say is – how can the militaries of the world do this to their people or stand with pride to say they have defended the vulnerable? How can they follow orders, like Nazi Germany, and target people (like Jewish holocaust), be part of a mission that targets all people with vaccines, lockdowns, surveillance, 5G, energy directed weapons, poisons as if no more than vermin? Where is the honour in working for an elite group who care nothing for civilians or soldiers. Even their own document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars regards the soldier as a welfare recipient.

https://ia802300.us.archive.org/10/items/silent-weapons-for-quiet-wars_202110/Silent%20Weapons%20for%20Quiet%20Wars.pdf

Extract: “The problem with stabilizing the economic system is that there is too much demand on account of (1) too much greed and (2) too much population. This creates excessive economic inductance which can only be balanced with economic capacitance (true resources or value – e.g., in goods or services). The social welfare program is nothing more than an open-ended credit balance system which creates a false capital industry to give nonproductive people a roof over their heads and food in their stomachs. This can be useful, however, because the recipients become state property in return for the “gift,” a standing army for the elite. For he who pays the piper picks the tune…

Those who get hooked on the economic drug must go to the elite for a fix. In this, the method of introducing large amounts of stabilizing capacitance is by borrowing on the future “credit” of the world. This is a fourth law of motion – onset, and consists of performing an action and leaving the system before the reflected reaction returns to the point of action – a delayed reaction. The means of surviving the reaction is by changing the system before the reaction can return. By this means, politicians become more popular in their own time and the public pays later. In fact, the measure of such a politician is the delay time. The same thing is achieved by a government by printing money beyond the limit of the gross national product, and economic process called inflation. This puts a large quantity of money into the hands of the public and maintains a balance against their greed, creates a false self-confidence in them and, for awhile, stays the wolf from the door. They must eventually resort to war to balance the account, because war ultimately is merely the act of destroying the creditor, and the politicians are the publicly hired hit men that justify the act to keep the responsibility and blood off the public conscience. (See section on consent factors and social-economic structuring.) If the people really cared about their fellow man, they would control their appetites (greed, procreation, etc.) so that they would not have to operate on a credit or welfare social system which steals from the worker to satisfy the bum. Since most of the general public will not exercise restraint, there are only two alternatives to reduce the economic inductance of the system.

1. Let the populace bludgeon each other to death in war, which will only result in a total destruction of the living earth.

2. Take control of the world by the use of economic “silent weapons” in a form of “quiet warfare” and reduce the economic inductance of the world to a safe level by a process of benevolent slavery and genocide. The latter option has been taken as the obviously better option. At this point it should be crystal clear to the reader why absolute secrecy about the silent weapons is necessary. The general public refuses to improve its own mentality and its faith in its fellow man. It has become a herd of proliferating barbarians, and, so to speak, a blight upon the face of the earth. They do not care enough about economic science to learn why they have not been able to avoid war despite religious morality, and their religious or self-gratifying refusal to deal with earthly problems renders the solution of the earthly problem unreachable to them. Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars (Page 18) It is left to those few who are truly willing to think and survive as the fittest to survive, to solve the problem for themselves as the few who really care. Otherwise, exposure of the silent weapon would destroy our only hope of preserving the seed of the future true humanity….”

The public are clearly victim blamed when education, economics, investments have always been directed by this elite. The very judgement they project onto others is the denial within themselves. They have not walked in our shoes, they do not experience exclusion based on perception which impacts ability to survive. They have no concept of the trouble they caused via the break down of the family, family planning, infertility, medicine (toxins), oil (pollution) of which they refuse to face in themselves. They do not face their own greed where 95% of the worlds assets are controlled by the 1% and the majority are supposed to fight over 5%, they see no problem in that imbalance? They manipulate the money system so they always win – fractional reserve banking. The fact they put the Federal Reserve in place through deceptive means. They fund both sides of conflict. They set up the soldiers and the public to be blood sacrifices on their own ideology which they believe to be true. What if real power requires no violence whatsoever as the power is in intention aligned with this higher power.

The public in my experience are innocent. They do the best they can given their world views. I found most people to err on the side of kindness. I’ve worked for Australian Defence Force Academy years ago when a secretary. I watched the parades. I don’t approve of the misogyny but see other men celebrate the put down of women as if that somehow elevates them, it doesn’t. To harm women and children is cowardly and ignorant, yet many soldiers suffer PTSD after committing these crimes, I met some of them. So mind control employed to justify the harm and death of innocent people for the entertainment of an elite who believe we need less people. What we need to stop is ‘greed’ fuelled by elites, false advertising, corruption of government officials and setting up whistleblowers in perpetual wars that never end for women and children. We are not holding weapons despite the intention to try and weaponise women as boxers and super heroes so men feel better when they hurt them or kill them. It is not the sign of a civilised society stating it wants world peace.

At some point we have to grow up, come out of ivory towers, face the music of our own making and apologise for our crimes against others and offer to serve the ones we hurt to learn humility sadly lacking in leadership positions. Until you walk in the shoes of those you harm, you know nothing about the world. We are all here to learn who we are. I note in some military leadership doctrines that speak about ‘know ourselves’. I often talk of ‘know thyself and be true’. I see true nobility not in riding a horse, holding a spear and pretending chivalry but in those who drop arms, but stand by their word and speak the truth to the people. Those prepared to die for a principle for what they say they are. I admire those men.

I noticed on Ben Roberts Smith military uniform where he had knights templar cross.

He is believing himself on some holy crusade. The real Templars were protecting pilgrims, they swore chastity, they were protecting the faith upon which all Holy wars were fought. I can’t say I agree with the Templars, but I recognise the original ones had a positive intention but didn’t understand the Christ consciousness of unconditional love. There is no enemy in a world of real (royal) honour. You see yourself in the other. As Gandhi said ‘weaknesses we all possess’. Defence is acceptable to prevent harm, hence this is why all militaries call themselves Defence, but not attack. The latter (becoming the norm) is ignored as profits can be made as the military was weaponised and privatised to acquire power not as protection of nation states. Thus we witness the stealing of assets, rare minerals, rape, land grabs, reparations, contracts, destroying homes, hospitals, infrastructure, evidence (tunnels) and opposition amongst many crimes hidden in the fog of war. That was never the purpose of defence nor was it the purpose of taxpayers money. It was to keep people safe and to deter attack, hence deterrence doctrines. Saving lives was what the purpose was. It became distorted to become the taking of life which is about winning, conquest and no mercy. The Templar were warrior monks. They were devoted to a higher lore, of which they were prepared to sacrifice and die. They were trained to not have an ego, to not acquire possessions, to remain in poverty and not run after women but to show discipline. This is what the modern soldier’s code was modelled on.

The warrior is symbolic of fighting dark forces in service to a greater good.

That is where this blog has led me. I have typed non-stop for 6 hours. Definitely inspired. Had no idea I would come here.

I send all love, especially the elite who know nothing of the love I send. All I wish for them is to truly know themselves and be true. Maybe spend some time out of the ivory tower and come and be one with ‘we the people’ you believe you hate, maybe you don’t know us. Through the World Economic Forum you say ‘you will have nothing and be happy’. I can attest to that, but only when it is my choice to no longer value the things put to us to seduce us and make us dependent. I see the debt trap of materialism which turns the creditor into a debtor. Like checkmate in chess. I am not the pawn anymore.

To break illusions you must contemplate the opposite.

I dedicate this blog to the children of the world, may they look forward to a future free of violence where adults learn to solve their problems, worship life and regain their true power of self mastery without the need for control. When they do the wars will end and all freed to live to their highest expression as there are no ordinary people.